Take a look inside the world’s largest discreet leadership platform for banking and financial services344 open mandates33 countriesEverything financial services leaders need

Confidential mandate

CIO – Enterprise Platforms — Institutional Platform

Urgent / New

CIO – Enterprise Platforms mandate in Singapore, Singapore · Financial Services

Consolidate duplicated regional platforms in Singapore to improve adoption and reduce run cost.

The mandate

A multinational-owned institutional platform has accumulated regional systems for client onboarding, workflow, data and controls. Local variants were often justified by speed, but the current landscape shows duplicated capability and no reliable view of who uses the enterprise platforms already funded. Run cost rises while adoption remains contested. The board has created one CIO seat to resolve the portfolio.

The CIO – Enterprise Platforms will steward approximately S$4,550 million in assets and investment and lead about 400 employees and material partners. Responsibility covers platform strategy, architecture, delivery, service, technology controls, data interfaces, suppliers and adoption. Business and risk leaders remain owners of their processes and decisions; the CIO must make common technology reliable and economically visible.

Standardisation must follow control and user evidence. A local variant may be legitimate where regulation or market infrastructure differs, but preference and historic sponsorship are not enough. Every platform needs a defined user population, service standard, control outcome, lifecycle cost and retirement route for the systems it replaces.

Remediation creates urgency but also a trap: adding another control layer can preserve the duplication that caused inconsistency. The appointee must decide where to repair, converge, replace or retire, protecting live client service and evidence throughout migration.

Platform product management must become a permanent capability. Business units should see a service roadmap, unit cost, adoption evidence and the consequence of bespoke demand. Product owners need authority to reject local features that undermine the standard while remaining accountable for usability and response. Funding should follow complete lifecycle value rather than the influence of the loudest market.

Supplier concentration also needs attention. Several regional systems may carry different names while depending on one vendor, cloud service or implementation partner. The CIO will map those shared failure paths, renegotiate data and exit rights and exercise recovery. Consolidation should reduce hidden concentration where possible, not exchange visible duplication for a single untested dependency.

Data migration will be governed as a customer and control event. Reconciliation, access, retention and deletion criteria must be approved before cutover; rollback should be practicable rather than theoretical. Legacy retirement is complete only when interfaces, support contracts and shadow extracts have also ended.

Why this seat is open

This urgent new role replaces distributed ownership, not an incumbent. The board intends to move from qualified shortlist to offer within six to eight weeks. Interim governance protects immediate remediation but cannot set long-term platform and leadership choices.

What you will own

  • Inventory regional platforms, users, controls, cost, dependencies and contractual commitments.
  • Define enterprise standards and evidence-based local exception criteria.
  • Steward S$4,550 million of assets, investment, risk acceptance and forecasts.
  • Tie funding to adoption, control improvement and system retirement.
  • Govern remediation technology, data lineage and sustainable closure.
  • Protect service, rollback and evidence through platform migrations.
  • Lead 400 employees and partners with clear product and service ownership.
  • Build technical succession and reduce dependence on vendors or individual architects.

The first 12 months

The first 90 days should reconcile the platform inventory with finance, users and control evidence. Meet the 30 stakeholders most consequential to duplicated cost, including market leaders, operations, risk, engineers and suppliers. Identify the variants driving the greatest control inconsistency or run cost, assess leaders and stabilise immediate remediation risk. Agree board gates for further platform investment.

Months four to nine should select target platforms, publish exception criteria and complete a controlled migration or retirement. Fill critical leadership gaps and release measurable licence, infrastructure, support or operational capacity. Adoption measures should distinguish provisioned access from active, compliant use.

By year end, standard platforms, measurable adoption and lower run cost should show repeatable progress. Delivery must be within 10% of the approved case and forecasts should reconcile investment, service, customer and people assumptions over three quarters. Priority risks need independently evidenced closure; severe escalations cannot remain unresolved beyond 30 days.

What the board will measure

  • Active and compliant adoption by platform, market and user population.
  • Controls standardised and independently verified through remediation closure.
  • Run cost and capacity released by completed system retirement.
  • Service reliability, migration quality and reduction in manual workarounds.
  • Critical-talent retention at or above 90% and ready-now cover for 70% of direct-report roles.
  • Quantified improvement in duplicated cost and control consistency with named data ownership.

The person

You are a CIO, Enterprise Platforms Leader or Technology Transformation Executive with 22–28 years in financial services or a similarly regulated environment. Your accountability has spanned platform investment, technical talent, production service and measurable business adoption.

Your P&L, book, budget or accountable portfolio has been at least S$2,650 million, and you have led 400 or more people. You can evidence a regional platform consolidation where controls improved, legacy systems retired and outcomes remained stable for two reporting periods.

You can challenge both local exceptionalism and central technology optimism. You make adoption and retirement visible, explain architecture in board terms and preserve independent risk ownership throughout remediation.

Compensation and terms

Base compensation is S$500,000–680,000 plus annual incentive and LTI. This permanent Singapore appointment is onsite, supports international relocation and can accommodate notice of up to six months. Final terms reflect confirmed platform scope.

Confidentiality

The organisation and remediation details will be disclosed only after fit and confidentiality are established. Composite facts must not prompt speculative contact.

More seats like this one

Every live mandate, by seat →

This mandate is confidential. The client is named only under a mutual NDA, and your own record is never listed, sold or shown to a company under your name until you release it for this specific mandate.