Take a look inside the world’s largest discreet leadership platform for banking and financial services344 open mandates33 countriesEverything financial services leaders need

Confidential mandate

Partner – Executive Advisory — Institutional Platform

Planned Hiring / New

Partner – Executive Advisory mandate in Mumbai, India · Financial Services

Build a cross-border executive-advisory proposition that helps institutional platforms align leadership, governance and operating choices when international expansion outpaces organisational readiness.

The mandate

Institutional financial platforms are entering new markets through branches, subsidiaries, partnerships and service hubs, then discovering that their executive accountabilities do not travel cleanly. Country leaders may own regulators but not products; global executives may own economics but not local conduct; committees multiply while decisions slow. An advisory firm is creating a Partner seat to help boards design leadership and governance around the actual enterprise choices created by cross-border growth.

The appointee will influence approximately 250 employees and partners and an advisory and client perimeter of about ₹3,950 crore. Work will sit at the intersection of strategy, governance, organisation and executive effectiveness. It may include decision-right design, top-team assessment, succession, board operating models and post-deal leadership. It is not executive coaching detached from enterprise outcomes, nor organisation-chart production without implementation.

The proposition must earn trust with chairs, CEOs and regulated country leaders. Recommendations need to recognise legal accountability, cultural context and the informal sources of power that determine whether a formal model works. The Partner should be prepared to say when the growth thesis itself creates irreconcilable leadership demands rather than presenting every problem as a people intervention.

Several recurring situations give the build practical focus: a country CEO accountable to a local board but dependent on global product heads; an acquired leadership team whose earn-out rewards conflict with integration; and a regional committee that advises without owning a final decision. Each demands different evidence. The Partner must resist importing a fashionable governance model when the client’s legal duties, talent supply or decision tempo require another answer.

Why this seat is open

This planned new hire follows recurring client requests that currently pass between strategy, risk and people practices. The partner council approved a dedicated build before expanding internationally, so the chosen leader can define scope, recruit specialists and establish ethical boundaries. Existing partners will contribute relationships; none owns the combined proposition.

What you will own

  • Define the executive situations the practice will address and the evidence required to connect leadership choices to enterprise value or risk.
  • Advise boards on global, regional and country decision rights, reserved matters and escalation across regulated entities.
  • Assess top teams against the future operating model, distinguishing capability gaps from unclear mandate or structural conflict.
  • Build succession and transition plans for roles whose authority crosses legal or cultural boundaries.
  • Integrate governance, organisation and strategy specialists into one accountable client argument.
  • Establish safeguards for confidential assessment data, conflicts and the separation of advisory work from executive search decisions.
  • Originate chair and CEO relationships while developing partners and directors who can lead future work independently.
  • Measure whether agreed decisions become faster, clearer and more durable after implementation.

The first 12 months

In the first quarter, review recent cross-border assignments and interview clients about the decisions that remained unresolved. Select two anchor situations and design methods using real governance and performance evidence. Agree how account partners participate and how sensitive individual findings are protected.

By month five, win and lead the first board mandate, recruit or appoint core specialists and produce a rigorous market point of view. Refuse work where the sponsor seeks a predetermined verdict on an individual or where independence cannot be protected. Establish follow-through reviews at six and twelve months.

During the second half, convert early cases into a repeatable but not formulaic practice. Develop directors in board facilitation and enterprise analysis, create cross-market adviser coverage and test recommendations with legal and regulatory specialists. Transfer at least one primary client relationship to shared leadership.

At year end, qualified pipeline should exceed three times the annual target; at least three material mandates should have board sponsorship and implementation evidence; 80% of agreed decision-right changes should be operating as intended at the first follow-through; contribution should meet the partner hurdle; and no assignment should produce a substantiated confidentiality or independence breach.

What the partner council will measure

  • Board-level work won for clearly defined executive and governance decisions.
  • Evidence that decision speed, accountability and succession improve after advice.
  • Client trust, confidentiality and professional independence.
  • Profitable collaboration across strategy, governance and people capabilities.
  • Development of advisers able to operate with chairs without dependence on the founding Partner.
  • Cross-border relevance without unsupported claims of universal practice.

The person

You have 22–28 years in board advisory, leadership consulting, regulated financial services or senior enterprise roles. Your accountable client, operating or advisory perimeter has exceeded ₹2,300 crore and you have led or influenced at least 250 employees and partners. You have worked across jurisdictions where formal reporting and real authority differed.

You can diagnose whether a leadership problem arises from the person, mandate, incentives, governance or strategy. Your work has led to consequential decisions whose results can be referenced after implementation. A portable chair network is useful but cannot substitute for method, delivery judgement and colleague development.

You bring discretion without opacity. You tell sponsors when evidence does not support their preferred answer and can facilitate disagreement among powerful executives without becoming the decision-maker. Experience with regulated-entity governance and executive succession is essential.

Compensation and terms

Fixed compensation is indicated at ₹2.2–3.0 crore plus performance variable. Measures cover client impact, growth, quality, collaboration and successor development. This advisory position is hybrid in Mumbai; the planned start can accommodate an appropriate notice period.

Confidentiality

Firm and client identities, board discussions and assessment material will be disclosed only after conflict review and confidentiality. The examples and scale are blended. Speculative approaches to possible institutions or executives are prohibited.

More seats like this one

Every live mandate, by seat →

This mandate is confidential. The client is named only under a mutual NDA, and your own record is never listed, sold or shown to a company under your name until you release it for this specific mandate.