Take a look inside the world’s largest discreet leadership platform for logistics and supply chain229 open mandates47 countriesEverything logistics & supply chain leaders need

Confidential mandate

Regional Managing Director — Freight-Forwarding Network

Urgent / Unplanned

Regional Managing Director mandate in Rotterdam, Netherlands · Logistics & Supply Chain

Reposition a freight-forwarding network around fewer, more defensible trade lanes while protecting shipper continuity, local accountability and the economics of procured capacity.

The mandate

A regional freight-forwarding network has expanded its lane catalogue faster than it has built repeatable advantage. Local offices maintain many origin-destination combinations, carrier agreements and customer exceptions, but volume is spread thinly and buying leverage is inconsistent. Margin is vulnerable to spot procurement, operational hand-offs and claims that surface long after revenue is recognised. The board has decided that the network must choose where it will lead, where it will partner and where it should stop pretending to offer distinctive control.

The Regional Managing Director will own that reset. This executive carries the regional P&L and authority across commercial, forwarding operations, procurement, gateway strategy and country leadership. Global carrier relationships and enterprise standards remain shared with group functions; the MD must turn them into lane-level decisions suited to the region rather than relying on nominal network coverage.

This urgent, unplanned appointment follows a sharper deterioration in selected lane contribution and reliability than planning anticipated. The brief is not a broad cost-reduction exercise. Customers whose supply chains depend on the network need managed continuity while capacity, offices and leadership attention are reallocated.

Scope and operating context

Based onsite in Rotterdam, the MD leads approximately 2,225 employees and material partners across the Netherlands and the wider international operating region. The portfolio includes ocean and air forwarding, road and rail connections, consolidation, customs coordination, gateway operations, control-tower services and destination delivery hand-offs.

Some lanes have dense contractual volume, experienced operators and balanced flows. Others rely on one large account, uncommitted bookings or persistent one-way imbalances. Commercial teams may describe revenue as strategic while forwarding desks absorb premium capacity and manual exception costs. Published gross profit can also obscure detention, demurrage, claims, credit notes and unbilled destination work.

The Rotterdam base creates direct exposure to a major European gateway, but port proximity alone does not confer advantage. The network must coordinate sailing choice, terminal flow, inland capacity, customs readiness and customer inventory priorities. Disruption can shift quickly between sea, road, rail and storage.

First-year agenda

The first ten weeks will establish a lane fact base. The MD will examine shipment volume, yield, bought capacity, utilisation, imbalance, service failure, working capital, claims, manual effort and customer concentration by direction and product. Results will distinguish temporary disruption from structurally weak propositions and expose transfers between origin, gateway and destination entities.

Each material lane will receive a deliberate posture: invest to lead, stabilise with a partner, serve selectively or exit. Investment lanes must have a defined shipper segment, capacity thesis, operational design, pricing discipline and accountable lane owner at both ends. Selective lanes will state what business is accepted and which exceptions require approval.

Carrier procurement will be joined to commercial intent. Commitments should reflect defensible volume and contingency need, not optimism embedded in annual budgets. The MD will introduce gates for minimum quantity commitments, allocation premiums and block-space exposure. Procurement performance will be judged after service, utilisation and recovery costs, not solely against headline rate.

Customer continuity plans will precede lane withdrawal or redesign. Account teams will identify active shipments, contractual obligations, inventory cycles, alternate routings and communication needs. Strategic customers will receive reasoned choices; they will not discover a network exit through rejected bookings or unexplained price inflation.

Gateway operations will be redesigned around the chosen portfolio. Cut-offs, consolidation schedules, documentation, customs hand-offs and inland connections must fit actual carrier windows. Chronic manual recovery work will either be engineered out, priced or removed. Technology queues will be prioritised by preventable shipment failure and labour consequence.

The organisation will shift from country-protected activity towards accountable lane management. Country MDs retain legal, people and customer responsibilities, while named lane leaders own contribution and service across borders. Decision rights for pricing, capacity, rerouting and exception spend will be explicit. Repeated disputes about transfer price will go to a transparent rule, not negotiation shipment by shipment.

Commercial coverage will follow the new choices. Sales incentives must reward retained contribution and forecast quality rather than gross booked revenue. The MD will personally review opportunities that create destination obligations, unusual liability or capacity concentration. Revenue from lanes designated for exit cannot be used to delay the decision indefinitely.

Working capital will receive operational attention. Billing triggers, accruals, carrier invoice matching, disputed accessorials and customer credit terms will be traced to the desk behaviours that create them. Cash improvement must not come from delaying valid supplier payment or coercing small partners.

Disruption management will use lane-specific playbooks. When a port closes or capacity tightens, teams need agreed prioritisation, alternates, customer authority and cost thresholds. Control towers should enable decisions, not add a reporting layer separated from forwarding desks.

Talent choices will reflect the focused network. The MD will assess country, gateway, procurement and lane leaders against commercial judgement and operational command. Expertise on lanes being de-emphasised will be treated respectfully and, where valuable, redeployed. Leadership changes will not be deferred merely to preserve local consensus.

By the first anniversary, priority lanes should show improved density, capacity fulfilment, service reliability and contribution; exit lanes should have controlled customer and operational transitions. Regional reporting should explain profit in shipment and lane terms, and leadership time should be concentrated where the network has chosen to compete.

Leadership responsibilities

The MD is accountable to the group board and Chief Executive for the regional enterprise, not only its forwarding volume. They will chair the trade-lane portfolio forum, align country leaders and challenge global functions when standard arrangements weaken regional service or economics.

They will remain visible in gateways and forwarding desks, particularly during disruption. Customer contact will focus on difficult portfolio choices and recovery, while carrier relationships will combine long-term credibility with firm performance management.

The role must sustain compliant customs, sanctions, competition, trade-control and anti-bribery practices while commercial pressure rises. No local result justifies a concealed routing or undocumented intermediary.

Measures of success

The board will review contribution and cash by lane, density, forecast accuracy, procured-capacity utilisation, premium recovery spend, schedule reliability, exception cycle time, claims and customer retention through portfolio changes. Transfer effects will be visible rather than left inside regional totals.

Strategic progress includes completion of invest, partner and exit decisions; gateway productivity; reduction in manual touches; succession for pivotal desks; and safe workforce transition. Market share without adequate contribution will not be accepted as proof of leadership.

Candidate profile

Candidates should bring more than 28 years across international freight forwarding, including regional P&L leadership and hands-on exposure to ocean, air and inland networks. They must have reprioritised trade lanes, renegotiated capacity and exited activity while protecting customer supply chains.

The board seeks examples of challenging uneconomic strategic revenue, resolving origin-destination conflict and leading through major gateway disruption. Strong customs, carrier, working-capital and forwarding-technology judgement is expected.

The successful executive will be decisive without becoming simplistic. They must understand the detail of shipment economics, earn credibility with experienced operators and explain hard portfolio choices calmly to customers and employees.

Compensation and appointment terms

The base range is EUR 410,000 to EUR 590,000, supplemented by annual incentive and long-term participation. Reward will be linked to sustainable lane contribution, cash, customer continuity, compliance, organisational focus and leadership succession. Final arrangements will reflect verified international P&L scale and deferred compensation.

Confidentiality

The group is unnamed because trade-lane choices, carrier terms, customer flows and leadership changes remain confidential. Detailed materials will follow identity, conflict and confidentiality review. Candidates must not submit rate sheets, shipment manifests, customer forecasts or privileged customs information.

More seats like this one

Every live mandate, by seat →

This mandate is confidential. The client is named only under a mutual NDA, and your own record is never listed, sold or shown to a company under your name until you release it for this specific mandate.