Confidential mandate

Multilingual Knowledge Operations Recovery Leader — Customer Operations

Urgent / New

Multilingual Knowledge Operations Recovery Leader mandate in Manila, Philippines · Regulated Customer Operations

A Manila customer-operations group needs an eight-month recovery leader after unsafe translation drift and fragmented knowledge ownership impaired regulated frontline support across twelve service languages.

The mandate

A regulator-facing policy change reached English-speaking support teams within hours but took nine days to appear accurately in three priority languages. Local teams patched articles and scripts outside the approved repository, machine translation obscured a customer-warning threshold, and no owner could identify which advisers had seen which version. The global knowledge director resigned during containment, leaving a material service-control gap.

The interim starts within one week for eight months, covering source-control recovery, twelve language pathways, two major policy releases, four controlled change drills and recruitment of a permanent leader. Content ownership, linguistic review, distribution, adviser acknowledgement and observed use must become one traceable operation. Five final weeks are reserved for handover, and no extension will absorb normal editorial demand.

Exit requires authoritative source designation, risk-based translation tiers, named language approvers, version lineage, time-to-live standards, exception routes, frontline verification, withdrawal controls and reconciled local repositories. Handover succeeds only when the permanent appointee governs an unseen urgent rule change across all twelve languages, recalls a defective translation and proves affected advisers switched before the customer deadline.

The leader may quarantine disputed content, suspend machine translation for controlled topics, require human review, close shadow repositories, replace temporary language leads and direct ₱1.1 billion of approved recovery investment. Compliance owns policy interpretation; Legal determines formal advice; Operations decides customer remediation. Permanent hiring, platform replacement and commitments above the delegated envelope remain with the executive committee.

Product documentation, marketing localisation, live case decisions, customer compensation, legal translation certification, employment discipline and enterprise content migration are excluded. The interim can stop distribution where meaning or lineage is unsafe but cannot invent policy, approve a regulatory interpretation or treat acknowledgement clicks as proof that advisers can apply a change under pressure.

Why this seat is open

The knowledge director resigned after a mistranslated threshold and uncontrolled local copies undermined a time-critical policy release. Immediate executive cover is required to stabilise twelve language chains before two further rule changes, while the permanent search prioritises a leader who can sustain both language quality and frontline-use evidence.

What you will own

  • Reconcile every controlled topic to an authoritative source, interpretation owner, translation tier and service deadline.
  • Establish language approval, version lineage, exception, withdrawal and supersession controls across twelve operating centres.
  • Rank human review and bilingual specialist capacity according to customer consequence, ambiguity and change velocity.
  • Eliminate shadow articles through migration evidence, access restrictions, search tuning and verified retirement of local copies.
  • Connect publication with adviser acknowledgement, scenario practice, quality observation and targeted capability repair.
  • Command four policy drills involving urgent interpretation, defective translation, system outage and late regional objection.
  • Hand authority to the successor after a client-led twelve-language release and complete defective-content recall.

Candidate qualifications

  • Led multilingual knowledge operations across regulated contact centres, payments, healthcare, insurance or comparable services.
  • Recovered source control and linguistic meaning where local workarounds had fragmented official customer guidance.
  • Designed risk-based translation, bilingual review, lineage, withdrawal and time-to-live controls for urgent policy change.
  • Proved frontline application through scenario and quality evidence rather than publication or acknowledgement metrics.
  • Maintained boundaries among knowledge operations, Compliance interpretation, legal advice, customer remediation and performance action.
  • Transferred a multilingual control system through an unseen release, translation defect and repository outage.

Non-negotiables

  • Can start within one week in Manila and complete seven centre residencies plus four policy-change drills.
  • Direct multilingual regulated-knowledge recovery is required; general localisation or content strategy is insufficient.
  • Will disclose translation providers, knowledge platforms, contact-centre vendors, regulators and outsourced service relationships.
  • Will not interpret policy, certify legal translations, decide customer cases, award compensation or discipline advisers.
  1. 49 words maximum. Describe a translation defect that changed the operational meaning of customer guidance.
  2. 49 words maximum. How did you prove frontline adoption after withdrawing uncontrolled local copies?
  3. 49 words maximum. State your availability for Manila and the first twelve-language policy drill.

This mandate is confidential. The client is named only under a mutual NDA, and your own record is never listed, sold or shown to a company under your name until you release it for this specific mandate.