Gladwin InternationalConfidential mandate

CRO – Enterprise Risk — Transport-Assets Portfolio

Urgent / New

Confidential CRO – Enterprise Risk seat addressing a balance-sheet rotation for a infrastructure developer and asset operator in Australia.

The mandate

The next planning cycle has brought into focus risk governance failing to keep pace with regional complexity within a institutionally backed infrastructure developer and asset operator. The immediate arena is the transport-assets portfolio during a balance-sheet rotation. For mandate 343, the successful executive inherits decisions that have been deferred, competing stakeholder expectations and a need to establish facts before committing further capital.

The CRO – Enterprise Risk operating perimeter covers approximately A$24,500 million in project and operating-asset portfolio, with activity spanning several transport-assets portfolio customer, product and delivery clusters rather than a single asset. The CRO – Enterprise Risk Infrastructure remit carries direct influence over roughly 1,825 colleagues and third-party capacity.

The board and its investment committee want a CRO – Enterprise Risk who can convert ambiguity into a short list of explicit choices for the transport-assets portfolio. The CRO – Enterprise Risk Infrastructure seat must resolve a balance-sheet rotation, while preserving the underlying strengths of the transport-assets portfolio. For mandate 343, value will come through sharper allocation, stronger leaders and an operating cadence that exposes variance early.

The CRO – Enterprise Risk’s first year on the transport-assets portfolio is expected to end with risk transparency, decisive escalation and sustainable remediation. In mandate 343, authority covers resources and leadership appointments; material trade-offs go directly to the board sponsor.

Why this seat is open

This is a newly created CRO – Enterprise Risk — Transport-Assets Portfolio seat, established because a balance-sheet rotation now requires one accountable executive rather than distributed ownership. The board has classified the appointment as urgent and intends to move from qualified shortlist to offer within 6–8 weeks. Interim governance protects the transport-assets portfolio, but it is not a substitute for a permanent appointee. The external search remains confidential to avoid unnecessary disruption before the appointment is agreed.

What you will own

  • Set the CRO – Enterprise Risk value-creation thesis for the transport-assets portfolio, translate it into no more than five enterprise priorities and stop work that does not support them.
  • Carry stewardship of approximately A$24,500 million in project and operating-asset portfolio, including allocation, risk acceptance and board forecasts.
  • Lead the CRO – Enterprise Risk Infrastructure organisation of about 1,825 employees and partners, appointing a team with clear decision rights and credible succession for every critical seat.
  • Resolve the transport-assets portfolio economics and execution constraints created by a balance-sheet rotation, with CRO – Enterprise Risk-approved owners, dated milestones and transparent escalation thresholds.
  • Establish one CRO – Enterprise Risk operating review across commercial, customer, financial, people, technology and risk outcomes for the transport-assets portfolio; remove reconciliations that obscure accountability.
  • Have held independent challenge authority and closed material issues with evidence accepted by board or supervisory review in mandate 343.
  • Build the CRO – Enterprise Risk’s three-year succession and capability plan for the transport-assets portfolio, reducing dependence on individual executives and improving mobility across the wider Infrastructure organisation.

The first 12 months

  • Days 1–90: Validate the transport-assets portfolio baseline, meet the 30 stakeholders most consequential to risk governance failing to keep pace with regional complexity, assess the leadership team, stabilise immediate delivery risks and agree a board-owned scorecard with explicit decision gates.
  • Months 4–9: Make the principal CRO – Enterprise Risk portfolio and organisation choices for the transport-assets portfolio, install the new operating cadence, fill critical leadership gaps and deliver the first measurable release of cash, capacity or customer value.
  • Months 10–12: Demonstrate a repeatable transport-assets portfolio trend against risk transparency, decisive escalation and sustainable remediation, lock the following year’s capital and talent plan, evidence control sustainability and present a credible three-year value case with downside actions.

What the board will measure

  • Delivery of the CRO – Enterprise Risk’s agreed first-year transport-assets portfolio value case within a 10% tolerance, with variance explained before rather than after the relevant quarter closes.
  • A CRO – Enterprise Risk forecast that remains decision-useful across three consecutive quarters and reconciles the transport-assets portfolio’s operating, cash, customer and people assumptions.
  • Closure of the CRO – Enterprise Risk mandate’s highest-priority transport-assets portfolio risk and execution issues by their board-approved dates, with independent evidence that fixes are sustained.
  • Retention of at least 90% of critical transport-assets portfolio talent and ready-now successors for at least 70% of the CRO – Enterprise Risk’s direct reports.
  • A quantified CRO – Enterprise Risk-owned improvement in the transport-assets portfolio operating constraint behind a balance-sheet rotation, supported by a clean baseline and named data owner.
  • Clear stakeholder confidence in mandate 343: no unresolved high-severity escalation older than 30 days and no material surprise withheld from its agreed governance forum.

The person

You are currently a CRO, Risk Director or senior controls executive in a institutionally backed Infrastructure or adjacent enterprise. In relation to the transport-assets portfolio, your CRO – Enterprise Risk track record includes a transition where the original plan was no longer sufficient; you can explain your choices, evidence and numerical impact. Candidates from infrastructure, construction, utilities, transport assets or project finance will be considered where the operating model, customer stakes and governance intensity match this CRO – Enterprise Risk brief.

As a CRO – Enterprise Risk candidate, you bring 18–22 years of progressive Infrastructure or adjacent-sector experience, consistent with the 18-22 experience band. At minimum, you have carried a P&L, book, budget or accountable portfolio of A$14,200 million and led an organisation of at least 1,275 people.

For mandate 343, the board wants two transitions: a difficult transport-assets portfolio portfolio choice and a leadership-system change during a balance-sheet rotation. As the prospective CRO – Enterprise Risk for this transport-assets portfolio, you must challenge optimistic cases and still create followership. References for mandate 343 must distinguish your contribution from the institution around you.

The CRO – Enterprise Risk must be based in Sydney; international relocation is supported, but this Infrastructure role is not designed as a remote appointment.

Non-negotiables

  • Current or recent accountability at the level of CRO, Risk Director or senior controls executive, with direct exposure to a board, investment committee or equivalent Infrastructure governance forum.
  • Proven CRO – Enterprise Risk ownership of at least A$14,200 million and leadership of no fewer than 1,275 employees in a comparable transport-assets portfolio context.
  • One completed Infrastructure or adjacent-sector example of risk governance failing to keep pace with regional complexity with outcomes sustained for at least two reporting periods after the initial intervention.
  • Sector credibility from infrastructure, construction, utilities, transport assets or project finance; experience that is purely functional and lacks CRO – Enterprise Risk-level transport-assets portfolio consequences will not meet the bar.
  • Willingness to meet the Sydney location expectation, complete conflicts and background diligence, and protect the confidentiality of mandate 343.

Compensation and terms

The anticipated CRO – Enterprise Risk package is A$520,000–700,000 base + annual incentive and LTI, calibrated to the final transport-assets portfolio scope and the candidate’s current mix. Any long-term participation for mandate 343 follows standard vesting and performance conditions. The CRO – Enterprise Risk appointment in Sydney, centred on the transport-assets portfolio, offers regular exposure to the board and its investment committee. A notice period of up to 6 months can be accommodated for the selected executive in mandate 343.

Confidentiality

This search is being conducted without naming the client for mandate 343. Identifying information will follow only when both sides elect to proceed under confidentiality; nothing in the published mandate should be treated as a clue to ownership or brand for mandate 343.

This mandate is confidential. The client is named only under a mutual NDA, and your own record is never listed, sold or shown to a company under your name until you release it for this specific mandate.