Advisory Finance Director, Technology Portfolio, Milan

Outcomes that will define success

• Within 90 days, agree one economic baseline and named owners across all 8 countries.
• Within 9 months, reduce unresolved forecast and control exceptions by 16% from the agreed baseline.
• Within 12 months, evidence $6 million of annual value without weakening regulatory or fiduciary controls.

Core responsibilities and decision rights

• Own the finance authority required to advise portfolio funding and product-exit choices.
• Decide the planning, reporting and evidence standards used across the 8-country scope.
• Set the capital and resource cases that may reach Chief Finance and Investment Officer.
• Stop commitments that preserve revenue-weighted product reviews without measurable economic or control evidence.
• Decline investment requests whose value owner, delivery dependency or downside remains unnamed.
• Choose the sequence for platform transition and expose dependencies before funding is committed.
• Determine the finance leadership accountabilities and escalation routes needed for southern European portfolio-finance decisions.

Candidate profile

You have led platform transition where finance carried the operating consequence, not merely the reporting calendar. You have worked at or above $595 million of revenue and across at least 4 countries, with direct accountability for forecasts, controls and capital choices. You can show where your judgement stopped a weak commitment as well as where it released investment. Planning, control, capital and commercial choices must be judged together. You have owned planning and forecasting at scale, connected control evidence to commercial decisions, and explained unresolved gaps to a board without hiding behind functional language. You understand the economics of enterprise applications and the operating pressure created because legacy products absorb engineering capacity although their retention value and migration risk remain disputed. You can work across southern European portfolio-finance decisions, challenge revenue-weighted product reviews, and remain accountable through the full 12-month horizon. You will distinguish urgent decisions from hurried ones, protect controls that work, and make the cost of every exception visible.

Critical experience

• Platform Pivot: The sponsor needs prior platform transition where the financial consequences reached the board.
• Platform Pivot: Experience of platform transition matters because legacy products absorb engineering capacity although their retention value and migration risk remain disputed.
• Professionalisation: Prior institutionalisation gives the leader a tested reference point for changing revenue-weighted product reviews.

Required leadership capabilities

• FP&A and forecasting — level 4: Recognised authority in planning and forecasting is needed because the first decisions depend on a trusted economic baseline.
• Controls and reporting — level 3: The leader must connect reporting evidence with the operating choices that finance is expected to challenge.
• Capital allocation — level 3: Capital allocation judgement determines which commitments continue when the portfolio exceeds available capacity.
• Board and stakeholder leadership — level 3: Board-level finance choices require concise explanation of trade-offs, consequences and unresolved gaps.

Scope and operating context

• Comparable experience should include responsibility for at least $595 million revenue, $385 million P&L, 1200 colleagues, and 4 countries.
• Principal leadership interfaces: Audit, Technology committees.
• Direct-report scope: No standing direct-report structure; influence is exercised through the sponsor and executive stakeholders.
• Candidates may be considered from: Milan, Italy; Paris, France; Frankfurt, Germany.
• Relocation support is available. Sponsor-supported work authorisation may be considered for qualifying candidates.

This mandate is unlikely to be right if

• You need revenue-weighted product reviews to remain untouched while accountability changes around it.
• You prefer advisory influence without ownership of the financial consequences attached to the work required to advise portfolio funding and product-exit choices.
• You require complete information before making choices across 8 countries; the sponsor expects staged decisions under uncertainty.

Application

Applications for this mandate are received in one way only: through the India Board Terminal's application process. It is automated end to end. Your Executive Passport travels to the mandate holder in its confidential form, your answers to the three questions below are read before anything else in your file, and every stage that follows is recorded on your applications page.

There is no address to write to and no intermediary to call. The mandate holder reads what the Terminal delivers and nothing else, which is what keeps the process the same for every applicant and keeps your name out of it until you release it. Applications close on 14 December 2026. Mandate reference GBX-MIL-TECH-CFO-51.