Gladwin InternationalConfidential mandate

Chief Strategy Officer — Energy-Services Division

Urgent / Unplanned

Confidential Chief Strategy Officer seat addressing a major-project recovery for a integrated energy producer and services platform in USA.

The mandate

The enterprise is entering a phase in which leadership must resolve strategy cycles producing choices without resource consequences within a privately held integrated energy producer and services platform. The immediate arena is the energy-services division during a major-project recovery. For mandate 396, the successful executive inherits decisions that have been deferred, competing stakeholder expectations and a need to establish facts before committing further capital.

The Chief Strategy Officer operating perimeter covers approximately US$34,550 million in operated asset and trading portfolio, with activity spanning several energy-services division customer, product and delivery clusters rather than a single asset. The Chief Strategy Officer Oil & Energy remit carries direct influence over roughly 650 colleagues and third-party capacity.

The board and its investment committee want a Chief Strategy Officer who can convert ambiguity into a short list of explicit choices for the energy-services division. The Chief Strategy Officer Oil & Energy seat must resolve a major-project recovery, while preserving the underlying strengths of the energy-services division. For mandate 396, value will come through sharper allocation, stronger leaders and an operating cadence that exposes variance early.

The Chief Strategy Officer’s first year on the energy-services division is expected to end with fewer priorities, explicit trade-offs and a funded execution path. In mandate 396, authority covers resources and leadership appointments; material trade-offs go directly to the board sponsor.

Why this seat is open

The Chief Strategy Officer — Energy-Services Division requirement was not included in the approved hiring calendar. It became urgent after a major-project recovery created an immediate need for one accountable owner of the energy-services division. Interim coverage protects essential decisions, but split ownership cannot continue through the next operating gate. The board intends to move from qualified shortlist to offer within 4–6 weeks while preserving confidential, evidence-led diligence.

What you will own

  • Set the Chief Strategy Officer value-creation thesis for the energy-services division, translate it into no more than five enterprise priorities and stop work that does not support them.
  • Carry stewardship of approximately US$34,550 million in operated asset and trading portfolio, including allocation, risk acceptance and board forecasts.
  • Lead the Chief Strategy Officer Oil & Energy organisation of about 650 employees and partners, appointing a team with clear decision rights and credible succession for every critical seat.
  • Resolve the energy-services division economics and execution constraints created by a major-project recovery, with Chief Strategy Officer-approved owners, dated milestones and transparent escalation thresholds.
  • Establish one Chief Strategy Officer operating review across commercial, customer, financial, people, technology and risk outcomes for the energy-services division; remove reconciliations that obscure accountability.
  • Have converted strategy into explicit capital and resource choices and then tracked execution through board governance in mandate 396.
  • Build the Chief Strategy Officer’s three-year succession and capability plan for the energy-services division, reducing dependence on individual executives and improving mobility across the wider Oil & Energy organisation.

The first 12 months

  • Days 1–90: Validate the energy-services division baseline, meet the 30 stakeholders most consequential to strategy cycles producing choices without resource consequences, assess the leadership team, stabilise immediate delivery risks and agree a board-owned scorecard with explicit decision gates.
  • Months 4–9: Make the principal Chief Strategy Officer portfolio and organisation choices for the energy-services division, install the new operating cadence, fill critical leadership gaps and deliver the first measurable release of cash, capacity or customer value.
  • Months 10–12: Demonstrate a repeatable energy-services division trend against fewer priorities, explicit trade-offs and a funded execution path, lock the following year’s capital and talent plan, evidence control sustainability and present a credible three-year value case with downside actions.

What the board will measure

  • Delivery of the Chief Strategy Officer’s agreed first-year energy-services division value case within a 10% tolerance, with variance explained before rather than after the relevant quarter closes.
  • A Chief Strategy Officer forecast that remains decision-useful across three consecutive quarters and reconciles the energy-services division’s operating, cash, customer and people assumptions.
  • Closure of the Chief Strategy Officer mandate’s highest-priority energy-services division risk and execution issues by their board-approved dates, with independent evidence that fixes are sustained.
  • Retention of at least 90% of critical energy-services division talent and ready-now successors for at least 70% of the Chief Strategy Officer’s direct reports.
  • A quantified Chief Strategy Officer-owned improvement in the energy-services division operating constraint behind a major-project recovery, supported by a clean baseline and named data owner.
  • Clear stakeholder confidence in mandate 396: no unresolved high-severity escalation older than 30 days and no material surprise withheld from its agreed governance forum.

The person

You are currently a Chief Strategy Officer, EVP Strategy or Corporate Development Head in a privately held Oil & Energy or adjacent enterprise. In relation to the energy-services division, your Chief Strategy Officer track record includes a transition where the original plan was no longer sufficient; you can explain your choices, evidence and numerical impact. Candidates from energy, oil and gas, utilities, chemicals, renewables or industrial services will be considered where the operating model, customer stakes and governance intensity match this Chief Strategy Officer brief.

As a Chief Strategy Officer candidate, you bring 22–28 years of progressive Oil & Energy or adjacent-sector experience, consistent with the 22-28 experience band. At minimum, you have carried a P&L, book, budget or accountable portfolio of US$20,050 million and led an organisation of at least 450 people.

For mandate 396, the board wants two transitions: a difficult energy-services division portfolio choice and a leadership-system change during a major-project recovery. As the prospective Chief Strategy Officer for this energy-services division, you must challenge optimistic cases and still create followership. References for mandate 396 must distinguish your contribution from the institution around you.

The Chief Strategy Officer must be based in Houston; international relocation is supported, but this Oil & Energy role is not designed as a remote appointment.

Non-negotiables

  • Current or recent accountability at the level of Chief Strategy Officer, EVP Strategy or Corporate Development Head, with direct exposure to a board, investment committee or equivalent Oil & Energy governance forum.
  • Proven Chief Strategy Officer ownership of at least US$20,050 million and leadership of no fewer than 450 employees in a comparable energy-services division context.
  • One completed Oil & Energy or adjacent-sector example of strategy cycles producing choices without resource consequences with outcomes sustained for at least two reporting periods after the initial intervention.
  • Sector credibility from energy, oil and gas, utilities, chemicals, renewables or industrial services; experience that is purely functional and lacks Chief Strategy Officer-level energy-services division consequences will not meet the bar.
  • Willingness to meet the Houston location expectation, complete conflicts and background diligence, and protect the confidentiality of mandate 396.

Compensation and terms

The anticipated Chief Strategy Officer package is US$320,000–420,000 base + annual incentive, calibrated to the final energy-services division scope and the candidate’s current mix. Any long-term participation for mandate 396 follows standard vesting and performance conditions. The Chief Strategy Officer appointment in Houston, centred on the energy-services division, offers regular exposure to the board and its investment committee. A notice period of up to 6 months can be accommodated for the selected executive in mandate 396.

Confidentiality

The organisation will be identified only after reciprocal interest and a confidentiality undertaking for mandate 396. The market, scale and situation in this brief are intentionally composite and are not a coded description of a named enterprise for mandate 396.

This mandate is confidential. The client is named only under a mutual NDA, and your own record is never listed, sold or shown to a company under your name until you release it for this specific mandate.