Nalini Tezqemvi

Nalini Tezqemvi · Chief Marketing Officer · India

Learning what happens after the presentation is approved

Jan 2020 — Present

Chief Marketing Officer

Zeqvemti Assurance

Sector
Commercial general insurance brand and public communication
Ownership
Domestic investor 60%, industrial group 25%, employee vehicle 15%; no personal holding
Company scale
₹2,140 crore gross written premium for FY ending March 2026; not revenue
Employees
960 employees across twenty-two offices
Geography
Kolkata headquarters with Indian regional offices
Reporting to
CEO Arun Qevzetni
Team
Forty-two employees through four marketing heads; eighteen agency colleagues separately
Financial scope
₹26.8 crore annual marketing authority, excluding commissions, pricing, underwriting and claims

Mandate

Keep the audience, evidence and practical scope of public communication aligned

Outcomes

  • Declined sales retargeting based on a service-query segment
  • Kept a survey's recognition figure within its recruited population
  • Clarified creative permissions and corrected outdoor reading conditions

Decisions in context

I became CMO in January 2020. Forty-two employees now work through four heads, with eighteen agency colleagues counted separately. I report to Arun Qevzetni and work with service head Farida Qevzeni. My ₹26.8 crore annual authority excludes distribution commissions and professional insurance expenditure. The insurer employs 960 people across twenty-two offices and recorded ₹2,140 crore gross written premium for FY ending March 2026. Ownership is 60% domestic investor,25% industrial group and 15% employee vehicle; I have no personal holding or statutory appointment. The role has required decisions about the purpose of an available audience, the inference a research sample permits and the conditions attached to creative work. I want a future board contribution to carry that attention to public promises into collective oversight, while leaving campaign approval and professional insurance decisions with the accountable executive owners.

Reason for the move

Continuing CMO work while considering a first outside board role

Concurrent appointment

Executive marketing appointment without a statutory directorship.

Apr 2012 — Dec 2019

Brand Director

Zeqvemti Assurance

Sector
General insurance brand development and service communication
Ownership
Domestic investor, industrial and employee ownership
Company scale
₹1,480 crore gross written premium in FY ending March 2013
Employees
710 company employees
Geography
Indian insurer managed from Kolkata
Reporting to
Chief executive officer
Team
Twenty-nine marketing employees
Financial scope
₹17.2 crore annual marketing authority

Mandate

Connect the insurer's public identity with the experience its service owners could substantiate

Outcomes

  • Expanded responsibility from campaigns to enterprise brand claims
  • Withdrew my overbroad paper-free insurer proposal
  • Retained both sunk placement cost and replacement expense in the correction

Decisions in context

I became brand director in April 2012. Zeqvemti had 710 employees and ₹1,480 crore gross written premium for FY ending March 2013. Twenty-nine marketing colleagues worked within ₹17.2 crore annual authority under the CEO. The role gave me a larger voice in how service progress became a public identity. In 2019 I approved a paper-free insurer claim although only 21 of 36 reviewed journeys had no paper requirement and 15 still did. The ₹38 lakh correction included ₹12 lakh already placed and ₹26 lakh new work. I keep that decision in my account because the overstatement came from an approval I gave, not an agency acting without direction. The experience changed the evidence I wanted beside a creative proposition: the service boundary had to remain visible before a narrow improvement became a description of the whole enterprise.

Reason for the move

Promoted to CMO in January 2020

Sept 2003 — Mar 2012

Marketing Manager

Zeqvemti Assurance

Sector
Commercial general insurance marketing
Ownership
Privately held domestic insurance enterprise
Company scale
₹430 crore gross written premium for FY ending March 2004
Employees
310 employees at appointment
Geography
Kolkata-led insurer with regional Indian operations
Reporting to
Commercial director
Team
Twelve marketing colleagues
Financial scope
₹6.4 crore annual marketing authority

Mandate

Explain the service without borrowing the authority of its professional decision-makers

Outcomes

  • Moved from agency accounts into the insurer's operating context
  • Learned the scope of underwriting, pricing and claims responsibilities
  • Connected campaign language with the colleagues accountable for its service meaning

Decisions in context

I joined Zeqvemti in September 2003. The insurer employed 310 people and recorded ₹430 crore gross written premium for FY ending March 2004. Twelve marketing colleagues worked within ₹6.4 crore annual authority under the commercial director. Agency experience helped me manage production and suppliers, but insurance required deeper learning about the promises a message could imply. A concise phrase could assign responsibility or certainty that the professional account did not support. I worked with service and specialist owners to understand those boundaries while keeping communication useful to its audience. The role taught me that clarity does not mean removing every condition, and that qualifications need to remain meaningful in the form people actually encounter. That discipline became more important when I later took responsibility for the brand's broader public identity and the assumptions carried by its central claims.

Reason for the move

Promoted to brand director in April 2012

Jul 1994 — Aug 2003

Account Director

Qevnemti Communications

Sector
Advertising account direction and creative production
Ownership
Privately owned Indian communications agency
Company scale
₹37 crore agency revenue for FY ending March 1995
Employees
142 agency employees
Geography
Kolkata-based agency serving regional and wider Indian clients
Reporting to
Managing director
Team
Sixteen account and delivery colleagues
Financial scope
₹2.3 crore agency delivery expense; client media purchases excluded

Mandate

Make the creative account usable across production, placement and supplier relationships

Outcomes

  • Accepted team responsibility after account coordination
  • Distinguished production payment from the terms of later creative use
  • Learned to connect research findings with the audience actually examined

Decisions in context

I became account director in July 1994. Qevnemti had 142 employees and ₹37 crore revenue for FY ending March 1995. Sixteen colleagues worked within ₹2.3 crore agency delivery expense under the managing director; client media purchases were excluded from that remit. I had to make an approved creative idea survive handovers between people with different responsibilities. The role exposed assumptions about rights, research and placement that could remain hidden during an attractive presentation. Paying for production did not automatically explain every later use, and a favourable response from a selected audience did not describe everyone a client hoped to reach. I moved into insurance to work closer to the enterprise whose promises the communication represented, carrying those lessons while recognising that the new sector would require its own professional understanding.

Reason for the move

Joined Zeqvemti as marketing manager in September 2003

Jul 1986 — Jun 1994

Account Coordinator

Qevnemti Communications

Sector
Advertising account coordination
Ownership
Domestic private communications business
Company scale
₹6.2 crore revenue for the financial year ending March 1987
Employees
Forty-six agency employees
Geography
Kolkata office and regional client programmes
Reporting to
Account manager
Team
One of seven account colleagues; no direct reports
Financial scope
No delegated budget or spending authority

Mandate

Coordinate approved campaign work and learn how context changes the received message

Outcomes

  • Entered agency work after communication study completed in May 1986
  • Learned production and placement responsibilities under an account manager
  • Developed attention to the difference between an approved proof and its public setting

Decisions in context

I joined Qevnemti in July 1986 after finishing communication studies that May. The 46-person agency recorded ₹6.2 crore revenue for FY ending March 1987. I was one of seven account colleagues under an account manager, without direct reports or delegated spending. Early assignments involved coordinating work that had already been approved, which showed me how much could still change between the presentation and the audience's encounter. Production conditions, placement and the person receiving a handover could all alter the practical result. My responsibility was to notice and report those issues within the manager's decisions, not to claim ownership of the client's strategy. The appointment began a continuous forty-year career and gave me a lasting interest in whether the message that leaves the studio remains the message people can actually use.

Reason for the move

Promoted to account director in July 1994

What I am looking for next

I would like to contribute to a board that needs to examine the relationship between its public claims and the organisation capable of supporting them. My experience offers questions about scope, audience purpose, research inference and the practical conditions of communication. I would first need to learn the enterprise and the professional responsibilities behind its promises. My present employment carries no statutory directorship or personal company holding. Registration and proficiency assessment were completed in May and September 2026 in this fictional account, while employer consent and qualified appointment-specific review remain necessary. Eighteen days are a provisional estimate, not a commitment that ignores induction, travel, reading or exceptional demands. I would value a chair who expects marketing experience to inform collective judgement without making a director an alternate campaign approver. The contribution should help management explain both the value and the limits of its evidence, and it should include my willingness to revise an interpretation when the operating account does not support the strongest public story.