1Jan 2020 — Present
Chief Marketing Officer
Zeqvemti Assurance
- Sector
- Commercial general insurance brand and public communication
- Ownership
- Domestic investor 60%, industrial group 25%, employee vehicle 15%; no personal holding
- Company scale
- ₹2,140 crore gross written premium for FY ending March 2026; not revenue
- Employees
- 960 employees across twenty-two offices
- Geography
- Kolkata headquarters with Indian regional offices
- Reporting to
- CEO Arun Qevzetni
- Team
- Forty-two employees through four marketing heads; eighteen agency colleagues separately
- Financial scope
- ₹26.8 crore annual marketing authority, excluding commissions, pricing, underwriting and claims
Mandate
Keep the audience, evidence and practical scope of public communication aligned
Outcomes
- Declined sales retargeting based on a service-query segment
- Kept a survey's recognition figure within its recruited population
- Clarified creative permissions and corrected outdoor reading conditions
Decisions in context
I became CMO in January 2020. Forty-two employees now work through four heads, with eighteen agency colleagues counted separately. I report to Arun Qevzetni and work with service head Farida Qevzeni. My ₹26.8 crore annual authority excludes distribution commissions and professional insurance expenditure. The insurer employs 960 people across twenty-two offices and recorded ₹2,140 crore gross written premium for FY ending March 2026. Ownership is 60% domestic investor,25% industrial group and 15% employee vehicle; I have no personal holding or statutory appointment. The role has required decisions about the purpose of an available audience, the inference a research sample permits and the conditions attached to creative work. I want a future board contribution to carry that attention to public promises into collective oversight, while leaving campaign approval and professional insurance decisions with the accountable executive owners.
Reason for the move
Continuing CMO work while considering a first outside board role
Concurrent appointment
Executive marketing appointment without a statutory directorship.
2Apr 2012 — Dec 2019
Brand Director
Zeqvemti Assurance
- Sector
- General insurance brand development and service communication
- Ownership
- Domestic investor, industrial and employee ownership
- Company scale
- ₹1,480 crore gross written premium in FY ending March 2013
- Employees
- 710 company employees
- Geography
- Indian insurer managed from Kolkata
- Reporting to
- Chief executive officer
- Team
- Twenty-nine marketing employees
- Financial scope
- ₹17.2 crore annual marketing authority
Mandate
Connect the insurer's public identity with the experience its service owners could substantiate
Outcomes
- Expanded responsibility from campaigns to enterprise brand claims
- Withdrew my overbroad paper-free insurer proposal
- Retained both sunk placement cost and replacement expense in the correction
Decisions in context
I became brand director in April 2012. Zeqvemti had 710 employees and ₹1,480 crore gross written premium for FY ending March 2013. Twenty-nine marketing colleagues worked within ₹17.2 crore annual authority under the CEO. The role gave me a larger voice in how service progress became a public identity. In 2019 I approved a paper-free insurer claim although only 21 of 36 reviewed journeys had no paper requirement and 15 still did. The ₹38 lakh correction included ₹12 lakh already placed and ₹26 lakh new work. I keep that decision in my account because the overstatement came from an approval I gave, not an agency acting without direction. The experience changed the evidence I wanted beside a creative proposition: the service boundary had to remain visible before a narrow improvement became a description of the whole enterprise.
Reason for the move
Promoted to CMO in January 2020
3Sept 2003 — Mar 2012
Marketing Manager
Zeqvemti Assurance
- Sector
- Commercial general insurance marketing
- Ownership
- Privately held domestic insurance enterprise
- Company scale
- ₹430 crore gross written premium for FY ending March 2004
- Employees
- 310 employees at appointment
- Geography
- Kolkata-led insurer with regional Indian operations
- Reporting to
- Commercial director
- Team
- Twelve marketing colleagues
- Financial scope
- ₹6.4 crore annual marketing authority
Mandate
Explain the service without borrowing the authority of its professional decision-makers
Outcomes
- Moved from agency accounts into the insurer's operating context
- Learned the scope of underwriting, pricing and claims responsibilities
- Connected campaign language with the colleagues accountable for its service meaning
Decisions in context
I joined Zeqvemti in September 2003. The insurer employed 310 people and recorded ₹430 crore gross written premium for FY ending March 2004. Twelve marketing colleagues worked within ₹6.4 crore annual authority under the commercial director. Agency experience helped me manage production and suppliers, but insurance required deeper learning about the promises a message could imply. A concise phrase could assign responsibility or certainty that the professional account did not support. I worked with service and specialist owners to understand those boundaries while keeping communication useful to its audience. The role taught me that clarity does not mean removing every condition, and that qualifications need to remain meaningful in the form people actually encounter. That discipline became more important when I later took responsibility for the brand's broader public identity and the assumptions carried by its central claims.
Reason for the move
Promoted to brand director in April 2012
4Jul 1994 — Aug 2003
Account Director
Qevnemti Communications
- Sector
- Advertising account direction and creative production
- Ownership
- Privately owned Indian communications agency
- Company scale
- ₹37 crore agency revenue for FY ending March 1995
- Employees
- 142 agency employees
- Geography
- Kolkata-based agency serving regional and wider Indian clients
- Reporting to
- Managing director
- Team
- Sixteen account and delivery colleagues
- Financial scope
- ₹2.3 crore agency delivery expense; client media purchases excluded
Mandate
Make the creative account usable across production, placement and supplier relationships
Outcomes
- Accepted team responsibility after account coordination
- Distinguished production payment from the terms of later creative use
- Learned to connect research findings with the audience actually examined
Decisions in context
I became account director in July 1994. Qevnemti had 142 employees and ₹37 crore revenue for FY ending March 1995. Sixteen colleagues worked within ₹2.3 crore agency delivery expense under the managing director; client media purchases were excluded from that remit. I had to make an approved creative idea survive handovers between people with different responsibilities. The role exposed assumptions about rights, research and placement that could remain hidden during an attractive presentation. Paying for production did not automatically explain every later use, and a favourable response from a selected audience did not describe everyone a client hoped to reach. I moved into insurance to work closer to the enterprise whose promises the communication represented, carrying those lessons while recognising that the new sector would require its own professional understanding.
Reason for the move
Joined Zeqvemti as marketing manager in September 2003
5Jul 1986 — Jun 1994
Account Coordinator
Qevnemti Communications
- Sector
- Advertising account coordination
- Ownership
- Domestic private communications business
- Company scale
- ₹6.2 crore revenue for the financial year ending March 1987
- Employees
- Forty-six agency employees
- Geography
- Kolkata office and regional client programmes
- Reporting to
- Account manager
- Team
- One of seven account colleagues; no direct reports
- Financial scope
- No delegated budget or spending authority
Mandate
Coordinate approved campaign work and learn how context changes the received message
Outcomes
- Entered agency work after communication study completed in May 1986
- Learned production and placement responsibilities under an account manager
- Developed attention to the difference between an approved proof and its public setting
Decisions in context
I joined Qevnemti in July 1986 after finishing communication studies that May. The 46-person agency recorded ₹6.2 crore revenue for FY ending March 1987. I was one of seven account colleagues under an account manager, without direct reports or delegated spending. Early assignments involved coordinating work that had already been approved, which showed me how much could still change between the presentation and the audience's encounter. Production conditions, placement and the person receiving a handover could all alter the practical result. My responsibility was to notice and report those issues within the manager's decisions, not to claim ownership of the client's strategy. The appointment began a continuous forty-year career and gave me a lasting interest in whether the message that leaves the studio remains the message people can actually use.
Reason for the move
Promoted to account director in July 1994
What I am looking for next
I would like to contribute to a board that needs to examine the relationship between its public claims and the organisation capable of supporting them. My experience offers questions about scope, audience purpose, research inference and the practical conditions of communication. I would first need to learn the enterprise and the professional responsibilities behind its promises. My present employment carries no statutory directorship or personal company holding. Registration and proficiency assessment were completed in May and September 2026 in this fictional account, while employer consent and qualified appointment-specific review remain necessary. Eighteen days are a provisional estimate, not a commitment that ignores induction, travel, reading or exceptional demands. I would value a chair who expects marketing experience to inform collective judgement without making a director an alternate campaign approver. The contribution should help management explain both the value and the limits of its evidence, and it should include my willingness to revise an interpretation when the operating account does not support the strongest public story.