- Sector
- Portable rechargeable task lamps for ordinary non-hazardous industrial workspaces
- Ownership
- Founders 58%, regional industrial fund 32%, employees 10%; no personal shares
- Company scale
- ₹164 crore revenue and ₹13.4 crore operating profit, FY ending March 2026
- Employees
- 390 company employees
- Geography
- Udaipur headquarters; Kota assembly
- Reporting to
- CEO Asha Vezhqumi
- Team
- Twenty-one product colleagues through three heads
- Financial scope
- ₹7.2 crore annual product-programme budget
Mandate
Shape product choices around application, understood state and supported service
Outcomes
- Funded a physical-indicator programme after prototype handover observations
- Kept different inspection tasks visible in the range proposition
- Bound a service account to completed qualified repairs
Decisions in context
I became CPO in January 2023, leading twenty-one colleagues through three heads with ₹7.2 crore annual product-programme budget. The company employs 390 people and recorded ₹164 crore revenue and ₹13.4 crore operating profit for FY ending March 2026. I report to Asha Vezhqumi. Nikhil Tevqami retains engineering, safety and release authority, while commercial owners retain orders. Founders own 58%, a regional industrial fund 32% and employees 10%; I hold no personal shares or statutory seat. Recent work has connected handover observations, different inspection applications and qualified service outcomes with the product proposition. The role requires me to keep the customer promise understandable while respecting the evidence and specialist authority behind it. Programme approval does not by itself establish a completed technical outcome or a universal product claim.
Reason for the move
Current executive appointment; no statutory seat
- Sector
- Industrial task-lighting products
- Ownership
- Privately held industrial manufacturer
- Company scale
- ₹127 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2021
- Employees
- 310 company employees
- Geography
- Udaipur product function and Kota assembly
- Reporting to
- Chief Executive Officer
- Team
- Fifteen product colleagues through three leads
- Financial scope
- ₹4.8 crore annual product-programme budget
Mandate
Develop the range around the circumstances in which customers use it
Outcomes
- Expanded responsibility across the product range
- Examined placement at forty nonferrous workstations
- Retained assessed clamp and bench-stand options rather than a universal-base claim
Decisions in context
I became head of product in April 2020. Fifteen colleagues worked through three leads within a ₹4.8 crore annual programme budget under the CEO. Nerqavli employed 310 people and recorded ₹127 crore revenue for FY ending March 2021. A 2022 study of forty nonferrous workstations showed that the magnetic base alone did not describe the placement customers needed. Twenty-six settings needed an assessed clamp option and fourteen a bench stand. We funded a ₹1.1 crore programme around those two choices. The decision preserved differences in the working setting rather than asking a single feature to stand for universal suitability. Qualified owners retained assessment of actual attachment. This appointment broadened my range responsibility while reinforcing a lesson from the earlier runtime correction: a product account must remain connected to the circumstances of the task.
Reason for the move
Promoted to CPO in January 2023
- Sector
- Portable rechargeable industrial task lighting
- Ownership
- Private manufacturing enterprise
- Company scale
- ₹91 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2016
- Employees
- 240 company employees
- Geography
- Udaipur headquarters and Kota assembly operations
- Reporting to
- Head of Product
- Team
- Ten colleagues through two leads
- Financial scope
- ₹2.9 crore annual product-programme budget
Mandate
Connect product specifications with the task implied by the proposition
Outcomes
- Joined the industrial task-lighting manufacturer
- Owned approval of a runtime headline with an inconsistent use image
- Withdrew the unqualified headline and retained the cost of repair
Decisions in context
I joined Nerqavli in September 2015 as group product manager. Ten colleagues worked through two leads with a ₹2.9 crore programme budget under the head of product. The company employed 240 people and recorded ₹91 crore revenue for FY ending March 2016. In 2018 I approved an eight-hour headline measured in low mode beside an image of high-mode work. High mode produced 3.2 hours under the defined conditions, while twelve of thirty reviewed jobs needed six hours in that mode. We withdrew the unqualified claim and spent ₹37 lakh on repositioning and field-material repair. I kept my approval responsibility visible. The correction concerned the promise readers could form from the combined account, rather than an invented battery defect or recall. It changed how I examined a proposition before approving its publication.
Reason for the move
Promoted to head of product in April 2020
IV
Product Manager
Zhevqani Product Works
Jul 2009 — Aug 2015
- Sector
- Industrial product design and development
- Ownership
- Privately owned product business
- Company scale
- ₹48 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2010
- Employees
- 170 company employees
- Geography
- Indian industrial product programmes
- Reporting to
- Product Director
- Team
- Six product colleagues
- Financial scope
- ₹82 lakh annual product budget
Mandate
Coordinate the proposition, development priorities and customer understanding
Outcomes
- Moved from design contribution into product-team responsibility
- Learned to distinguish a customer promise from a feature inventory
- Worked with specialist owners whose assessments shaped the offer
Decisions in context
Product management began in July 2009. Zhevqani employed 170 people and recorded ₹48 crore revenue for FY ending March 2010. I led six colleagues within an ₹82 lakh annual budget under the product director. The change widened my responsibility from contributing designs to coordinating the choices that shaped the offer. I had to understand which use deserved priority, what the customer needed to recognise and which assessments other specialists had to complete. A feature could be attractive in isolation and still require a different explanation when placed in the customer's task. I learned to discuss those differences before a product story became fixed. The experience also taught me to distinguish my product decisions from the technical approvals and commercial commitments owned elsewhere, a boundary that remained important after I moved into industrial lighting.
Reason for the move
Joined Nerqavli as group product manager in September 2015
V
Product Designer
Zhevqani Product Works
Jul 2004 — Jun 2009
- Sector
- Industrial product design
- Ownership
- Private design and product enterprise
- Company scale
- ₹16 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2005
- Employees
- 75 company employees
- Geography
- Indian product-design work
- Reporting to
- Design Team Lead
- Team
- One of seven designers; no direct reports
- Financial scope
- No delegated spending authority
Mandate
Understand how the object meets the task in its intended setting
Outcomes
- Entered product design after completing a design degree
- Developed observation and communication skills within a specialist team
- Built experience before taking management or budget responsibility
Decisions in context
I joined Zhevqani in July 2004 after completing my design degree in May. The seventy-five-person company recorded ₹16 crore revenue for FY ending March 2005. I worked among seven designers under the design team lead, with no direct reports or delegated spending. My early contribution involved following the object into the setting where someone would use it. I learned that the conditions visible during a presentation could differ from those shaping an ordinary task. More experienced colleagues owned development commitments and approvals. The appointment gave me time to practise observation, discuss alternatives and explain design choices without claiming responsibility for the whole business. It began a continuous twenty-two-year career and an interest in making the product described before purchase recognisable in the experience that follows.
Reason for the move
Promoted to product manager in July 2009
What I am looking for next
I would consider a first outside board role where product judgement adds to the institution's existing technical, financial and operating perspectives. I would bring experience of how a specification becomes a customer promise and how a useful service result can be overstated. I would also need to learn the receiving enterprise's economics, people and responsibilities beyond my function. My exposure consists of product proposals discussed through the CEO; I have no statutory seat. Fictional IICA preparation has not reached registration, and no passed assessment or exemption is claimed. Twenty-one provisional days must accommodate induction, preparation, travel and unusual demands, with employer consent. I would disclose relevant founder, fund, customer and supplier relationships before confidential access. The appointment should let me contribute to collective judgement while keeping engineering, operations and commercial execution with management. I would want a chair who expects me to explain a product concern clearly, including an error I owned, and to accept challenge to my interpretation of the evidence.