Harmeet Zerqemvi

Harmeet Zerqemvi · Chief Product Officer · India

Learning to carry the task into the product decision

I

Chief Product Officer

Nerqavli Inspection Lighting

Jan 2023 — Present

Sector
Portable rechargeable task lamps for ordinary non-hazardous industrial workspaces
Ownership
Founders 58%, regional industrial fund 32%, employees 10%; no personal shares
Company scale
₹164 crore revenue and ₹13.4 crore operating profit, FY ending March 2026
Employees
390 company employees
Geography
Udaipur headquarters; Kota assembly
Reporting to
CEO Asha Vezhqumi
Team
Twenty-one product colleagues through three heads
Financial scope
₹7.2 crore annual product-programme budget

Mandate

Shape product choices around application, understood state and supported service

Outcomes

  • Funded a physical-indicator programme after prototype handover observations
  • Kept different inspection tasks visible in the range proposition
  • Bound a service account to completed qualified repairs

Decisions in context

I became CPO in January 2023, leading twenty-one colleagues through three heads with ₹7.2 crore annual product-programme budget. The company employs 390 people and recorded ₹164 crore revenue and ₹13.4 crore operating profit for FY ending March 2026. I report to Asha Vezhqumi. Nikhil Tevqami retains engineering, safety and release authority, while commercial owners retain orders. Founders own 58%, a regional industrial fund 32% and employees 10%; I hold no personal shares or statutory seat. Recent work has connected handover observations, different inspection applications and qualified service outcomes with the product proposition. The role requires me to keep the customer promise understandable while respecting the evidence and specialist authority behind it. Programme approval does not by itself establish a completed technical outcome or a universal product claim.

Reason for the move

Current executive appointment; no statutory seat

II

Head of Product

Nerqavli Inspection Lighting

Apr 2020 — Dec 2022

Sector
Industrial task-lighting products
Ownership
Privately held industrial manufacturer
Company scale
₹127 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2021
Employees
310 company employees
Geography
Udaipur product function and Kota assembly
Reporting to
Chief Executive Officer
Team
Fifteen product colleagues through three leads
Financial scope
₹4.8 crore annual product-programme budget

Mandate

Develop the range around the circumstances in which customers use it

Outcomes

  • Expanded responsibility across the product range
  • Examined placement at forty nonferrous workstations
  • Retained assessed clamp and bench-stand options rather than a universal-base claim

Decisions in context

I became head of product in April 2020. Fifteen colleagues worked through three leads within a ₹4.8 crore annual programme budget under the CEO. Nerqavli employed 310 people and recorded ₹127 crore revenue for FY ending March 2021. A 2022 study of forty nonferrous workstations showed that the magnetic base alone did not describe the placement customers needed. Twenty-six settings needed an assessed clamp option and fourteen a bench stand. We funded a ₹1.1 crore programme around those two choices. The decision preserved differences in the working setting rather than asking a single feature to stand for universal suitability. Qualified owners retained assessment of actual attachment. This appointment broadened my range responsibility while reinforcing a lesson from the earlier runtime correction: a product account must remain connected to the circumstances of the task.

Reason for the move

Promoted to CPO in January 2023

III

Group Product Manager

Nerqavli Inspection Lighting

Sept 2015 — Mar 2020

Sector
Portable rechargeable industrial task lighting
Ownership
Private manufacturing enterprise
Company scale
₹91 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2016
Employees
240 company employees
Geography
Udaipur headquarters and Kota assembly operations
Reporting to
Head of Product
Team
Ten colleagues through two leads
Financial scope
₹2.9 crore annual product-programme budget

Mandate

Connect product specifications with the task implied by the proposition

Outcomes

  • Joined the industrial task-lighting manufacturer
  • Owned approval of a runtime headline with an inconsistent use image
  • Withdrew the unqualified headline and retained the cost of repair

Decisions in context

I joined Nerqavli in September 2015 as group product manager. Ten colleagues worked through two leads with a ₹2.9 crore programme budget under the head of product. The company employed 240 people and recorded ₹91 crore revenue for FY ending March 2016. In 2018 I approved an eight-hour headline measured in low mode beside an image of high-mode work. High mode produced 3.2 hours under the defined conditions, while twelve of thirty reviewed jobs needed six hours in that mode. We withdrew the unqualified claim and spent ₹37 lakh on repositioning and field-material repair. I kept my approval responsibility visible. The correction concerned the promise readers could form from the combined account, rather than an invented battery defect or recall. It changed how I examined a proposition before approving its publication.

Reason for the move

Promoted to head of product in April 2020

IV

Product Manager

Zhevqani Product Works

Jul 2009 — Aug 2015

Sector
Industrial product design and development
Ownership
Privately owned product business
Company scale
₹48 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2010
Employees
170 company employees
Geography
Indian industrial product programmes
Reporting to
Product Director
Team
Six product colleagues
Financial scope
₹82 lakh annual product budget

Mandate

Coordinate the proposition, development priorities and customer understanding

Outcomes

  • Moved from design contribution into product-team responsibility
  • Learned to distinguish a customer promise from a feature inventory
  • Worked with specialist owners whose assessments shaped the offer

Decisions in context

Product management began in July 2009. Zhevqani employed 170 people and recorded ₹48 crore revenue for FY ending March 2010. I led six colleagues within an ₹82 lakh annual budget under the product director. The change widened my responsibility from contributing designs to coordinating the choices that shaped the offer. I had to understand which use deserved priority, what the customer needed to recognise and which assessments other specialists had to complete. A feature could be attractive in isolation and still require a different explanation when placed in the customer's task. I learned to discuss those differences before a product story became fixed. The experience also taught me to distinguish my product decisions from the technical approvals and commercial commitments owned elsewhere, a boundary that remained important after I moved into industrial lighting.

Reason for the move

Joined Nerqavli as group product manager in September 2015

V

Product Designer

Zhevqani Product Works

Jul 2004 — Jun 2009

Sector
Industrial product design
Ownership
Private design and product enterprise
Company scale
₹16 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2005
Employees
75 company employees
Geography
Indian product-design work
Reporting to
Design Team Lead
Team
One of seven designers; no direct reports
Financial scope
No delegated spending authority

Mandate

Understand how the object meets the task in its intended setting

Outcomes

  • Entered product design after completing a design degree
  • Developed observation and communication skills within a specialist team
  • Built experience before taking management or budget responsibility

Decisions in context

I joined Zhevqani in July 2004 after completing my design degree in May. The seventy-five-person company recorded ₹16 crore revenue for FY ending March 2005. I worked among seven designers under the design team lead, with no direct reports or delegated spending. My early contribution involved following the object into the setting where someone would use it. I learned that the conditions visible during a presentation could differ from those shaping an ordinary task. More experienced colleagues owned development commitments and approvals. The appointment gave me time to practise observation, discuss alternatives and explain design choices without claiming responsibility for the whole business. It began a continuous twenty-two-year career and an interest in making the product described before purchase recognisable in the experience that follows.

Reason for the move

Promoted to product manager in July 2009

What I am looking for next

I would consider a first outside board role where product judgement adds to the institution's existing technical, financial and operating perspectives. I would bring experience of how a specification becomes a customer promise and how a useful service result can be overstated. I would also need to learn the receiving enterprise's economics, people and responsibilities beyond my function. My exposure consists of product proposals discussed through the CEO; I have no statutory seat. Fictional IICA preparation has not reached registration, and no passed assessment or exemption is claimed. Twenty-one provisional days must accommodate induction, preparation, travel and unusual demands, with employer consent. I would disclose relevant founder, fund, customer and supplier relationships before confidential access. The appointment should let me contribute to collective judgement while keeping engineering, operations and commercial execution with management. I would want a chair who expects me to explain a product concern clearly, including an error I owned, and to accept challenge to my interpretation of the evidence.