Chief Financial Officer
Zevqoshi Kiln Furniture
- Sector
- Ceramic supports and setters for industrial kilns
- Ownership
- Regional industrial fund 65%; employee owners 35%; no direct holding by Deeksha
- Company scale
- ₹264 crore revenue, ₹31.2 crore EBITDA and ₹18.6 crore operating profit, FY ending March 2026
- Employees
- 680 company employees
- Geography
- Rourkela headquarters; plants in Rourkela and Sambalpur
- Reporting to
- Chief Executive Officer Anand Tezqoshi
- Team
- Thirty-eight finance colleagues through four heads
- Financial scope
- ₹7.8 crore annual finance-function expense
Mandate
Connect funding, obligations and manufacturing economics in enterprise decisions
Outcomes
- Brought advance-related fulfilment into a dividend decision
- Limited invoice funding with retained recourse visible
- Declined uneconomic refinancing and revised constrained-capacity costing
Decisions in context
I became CFO in February 2021, leading 38 colleagues through four heads with ₹7.8 crore annual function expense under Anand. Nisha leads operations. The company employs 680 people at Rourkela and Sambalpur and recorded ₹264 crore revenue, ₹31.2 crore EBITDA and ₹18.6 crore operating profit for FY 2026. A regional industrial fund owns 65% and employee owners 35%; I hold no direct equity. My decisions concern the obligations behind cash receipts, funding terms and the operating resource relevant to financial comparisons. I have no statutory seat and present matters through the CEO. Company results are enterprise measures, not a statement of personal causation. Technical release and formal professional assessments remain with the authorised specialists, while finance makes their implications understandable in the decision account.
Reason for the move
Current CFO position; no statutory appointment
Head of Planning
Zevqoshi Kiln Furniture
- Sector
- Industrial ceramic kiln-support manufacturing
- Ownership
- Privately held industrial-fund and employee ownership
- Company scale
- ₹198 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2018
- Employees
- 510 company employees
- Geography
- Rourkela and Sambalpur production operations
- Reporting to
- Chief Financial Officer
- Team
- Twenty-four finance and planning colleagues through three leads
- Financial scope
- ₹5.2 crore annual planning-function expense
Mandate
Build decision accounts connecting investment proposals with their funding needs
Outcomes
- Expanded enterprise planning responsibility
- Owned an incomplete kiln-project cash proposal
- Rebuilt the review of work outside the equipment quotation
Decisions in context
I became head of planning in April 2017. The business had 510 employees and ₹198 crore revenue for FY 2018. I led 24 colleagues through three leads with ₹5.2 crore annual expense under the CFO. In 2019 I endorsed a kiln proposal framed around ₹9.8 crore of equipment, leaving civil work, connection and startup needs outside the cash account. Their ₹3.2 crore total required additional approval and the project was delayed nine weeks. I accepted responsibility for treating a supplier amount as a more complete enterprise commitment than it was. The corrected ₹13 crore described project cash, not a common accounting treatment for every component. The experience changed how I assembled operating requirements and financial assumptions before presenting an investment for approval.
Reason for the move
Promoted to CFO in February 2021
Controller
Zevqoshi Kiln Furniture
- Sector
- Ceramic setters and supports used in industrial kilns
- Ownership
- Privately held manufacturing enterprise
- Company scale
- ₹112 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2012
- Employees
- 310 company employees
- Geography
- Rourkela manufacturing and industrial-customer relationships
- Reporting to
- Chief Financial Officer
- Team
- Sixteen finance colleagues through three leads
- Financial scope
- ₹3.4 crore annual control-function expense
Mandate
Connect the financial record with the operating context of kiln-support production
Outcomes
- Moved into a specialist industrial ceramic-support business
- Developed enterprise control beyond site finance
- Worked with production colleagues on resource-based economic questions
Decisions in context
I joined Zevqoshi in July 2011 as controller. The company employed 310 people and recorded ₹112 crore revenue for FY 2012. I led sixteen colleagues through three leads with ₹3.4 crore annual expense under the CFO. The business made ceramic supports and setters for use inside industrial kilns, which required me to understand the production context behind financial measures. A commercial unit did not necessarily consume the same operating resources as another, and a cash receipt did not explain every obligation still attached to the work. I learned from manufacturing colleagues while retaining the distinction between financial interpretation and technical assessment. This period broadened my enterprise perspective and prepared me for planning responsibility, although the later project failure showed that familiarity did not remove the need for disciplined review.
Reason for the move
Appointed head of planning in April 2017
Site Finance Lead
Qevruli Ceramic Components
- Sector
- Industrial ceramic-component production
- Ownership
- Founder-owned private manufacturing company
- Company scale
- ₹49 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2006
- Employees
- 180 company employees
- Geography
- Odisha production site and industrial customers
- Reporting to
- Chief Financial Officer
- Team
- Seven finance colleagues through two leads
- Financial scope
- ₹1.2 crore annual site-finance expense
Mandate
Explain site economics with the operating assumptions visible
Outcomes
- Took people and finance-function expenditure responsibility
- Connected financial categories with the production account
- Learned to distinguish a useful measure from a complete decision
Decisions in context
I became site finance lead in May 2005. Qevruli had 180 employees and ₹49 crore revenue for FY 2006. I led seven colleagues through two leads with ₹1.2 crore annual expense, reporting to the CFO. The role made me responsible for how a team explained the site's finances, not simply for producing an individual analysis. I learned to ask what a measure included and whether it was being used for the same question it had been assembled to answer. Operating colleagues helped me understand the conditions behind apparent unit economics, while finance needed to make those conditions visible to decision makers. The experience developed my ability to connect a numerical account with a practical choice without claiming that the model could resolve every operating or professional judgement by itself.
Reason for the move
Joined Zevqoshi as controller in July 2011
Cost Analyst
Qevruli Ceramic Components
- Sector
- Manufactured industrial ceramic components
- Ownership
- Founder-owned private producer
- Company scale
- ₹12 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2000
- Employees
- 70 company employees
- Geography
- Rourkela-area manufacturing work
- Reporting to
- Plant Controller
- Team
- Analytical role in a five-person group, without supervisory responsibility
- Financial scope
- No authority to commit expenditure
Mandate
Support costing by learning the work and resources behind the financial record
Outcomes
- Applied commerce study to factory analysis
- Developed an understanding of production resource use
- Built experience before leading a team or function budget
Decisions in context
I joined Qevruli in July 1999 after completing my commerce degree in June. The enterprise employed seventy people and recorded ₹12 crore revenue for FY ending March 2000. I worked in a five-person group under the plant controller, with neither direct reports nor authority to commit expenditure. My task was to support costing and understand the production activity behind the records I used. I learned that a familiar financial label could describe different conditions and that a useful analysis depended on asking the people who knew the work. The role did not carry the approval authority I would later hold as a senior finance leader. It established the beginning of a continuous career in manufacturing finance and an interest in explaining how resource use changes the meaning of a number.
Reason for the move
Promoted to site finance lead in May 2005
What I am looking for next
I would explore a first outside appointment where manufacturing finance could complement the board's existing skills. My experience could help directors examine a project's complete cash requirement, the obligations behind funding and the operating constraint that a contribution measure needs to reflect. I would need to learn the receiving enterprise's customers, people and sector responsibilities beyond the financial questions I know best. There is no statutory seat or direct equity in my current record. The fictional preparation includes March 2026 IICA registration and a September assessment pass, with no exemption. Twenty-four provisional days would need to cover induction, reading, meetings, travel and unusual demands alongside my present role. Employer consent and qualified review of relationships would precede an appointment. I would seek a chair who helps first-time directors contribute to collective judgement, with complementary expertise and clear expectations about when a question supports oversight and when it begins to take over management's work.