- Sector
- Industrial process valves
- Ownership
- Overseas industrial parent 70%; regional founder owners 30%; Peter holds no equity
- Company scale
- ₹316 crore revenue and ₹27 crore operating profit, FY ending March 2026
- Employees
- 820 employees across the enterprise
- Geography
- Hosur and Belagavi manufacturing facilities
- Reporting to
- CEO Asha Qevthali; functional coordination with the parent's people director
- Team
- Thirty-four HR colleagues organised through five heads
- Financial scope
- ₹8.6 crore annual people-function expense
Mandate
Connect group people programmes with accountable employment decisions in India
Outcomes
- Clarified authority before eleven proposals proceeded
- Kept different return-assignment outcomes visible
- Withheld internal interview clips from a proposed external campaign
Decisions in context
I became CHRO in February 2021 after the overseas parent acquired 70% of Zevrashi in 2020. Regional founder owners retained 30%. I report to Asha Qevthali and coordinate with the parent's people director, leading 34 colleagues through five heads with ₹8.6 crore annual function expense. Dev Qervani is COO. The company employs 820 people at Hosur and Belagavi, with ₹316 crore revenue and ₹27 crore operating profit for FY 2026. My work concerns the employment commitments inside group decisions, international assignments and employee participation. Functional coordination does not confer every approval authority. The cases preserve held proposals, return roles still unresolved and a campaign use withheld before publication. I hold no equity or statutory appointment, and the enterprise's financial performance is not presented as a personal HR outcome.
Reason for the move
Current executive role without a statutory seat
- Sector
- Manufactured industrial valves and associated factory operations
- Ownership
- Regional founder ownership until the 2020 majority acquisition
- Company scale
- ₹181 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2014
- Employees
- 590 company employees
- Geography
- Hosur-led industrial manufacturing operations
- Reporting to
- Chief Executive Officer
- Team
- Twenty-three people-function colleagues through four leads
- Financial scope
- ₹4.8 crore annual people-operations expense
Mandate
Build enterprise people practices from factory-level experience
Outcomes
- Took responsibility for enterprise people operations
- Owned the design error in an attendance-recognition scheme
- Prepared for the change from founder ownership to a multinational subsidiary
Decisions in context
I moved into enterprise people operations in April 2013. Zevrashi employed 590 people and recorded ₹181 crore revenue for FY 2014. My team included 23 colleagues through four leads, with ₹4.8 crore annual function expense under the CEO. In 2016 I endorsed a recognition rule that excluded approved leave from eligibility and allowed attendance to stand for reliability. Of 104 exclusions, 68 involved only authorised absence. We stopped before awards were made, retaining ₹18 lakh already spent. I accepted responsibility for the meaning the rule had acquired through my approval. The role later included preparation for the 2020 majority acquisition. Both experiences strengthened my interest in how institutional decisions become commitments that employees understand and rely on, while leaving legal and formal approval questions with the appropriate professionals and authorities.
Reason for the move
Appointed CHRO in February 2021
- Sector
- Industrial process-valve production
- Ownership
- Privately held regional founder-owned manufacturer
- Company scale
- ₹96 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2006
- Employees
- 380 people in the company
- Geography
- Hosur factory and associated operations
- Reporting to
- Managing Director
- Team
- Fourteen HR colleagues with three team leads
- Financial scope
- ₹2.4 crore annual site HR expense
Mandate
Make factory people decisions understandable and workable across different jobs
Outcomes
- Moved from mechanical works into valve manufacturing
- Led a larger site HR team and expense remit
- Developed experience connecting policy with individual employment circumstances
Decisions in context
I joined Zevrashi in July 2005 as site HR manager. The company had 380 employees and ₹96 crore revenue for FY 2006. I led fourteen colleagues through three leads with ₹2.4 crore annual expense, reporting to the managing director. The factory brought production, technical and supervisory roles into the same policy environment, while their circumstances could differ. I learned to examine the point where a general rule became a particular consequence for a colleague. That required listening to operating managers and understanding the limits of my own authority, rather than assuming that HR could resolve every issue alone. The experience prepared me for enterprise responsibility and a more demanding review of how decisions were explained, although my later attendance-award approval showed that the lesson still needed to be applied more carefully.
Reason for the move
Promoted to head of people operations in April 2013
- Sector
- Regional mechanical-component manufacturing
- Ownership
- Privately held founder-owned enterprise
- Company scale
- ₹41 crore company revenue, FY ending March 1996
- Employees
- 260 employees
- Geography
- Tamil Nadu manufacturing operations
- Reporting to
- Works Director
- Team
- Nine personnel colleagues supported by two leads
- Financial scope
- ₹1.1 crore annual personnel-function expense
Mandate
Lead the people team while connecting employment records with manager decisions
Outcomes
- Accepted supervisory and function-expense responsibility
- Developed personnel judgement beyond individual administration
- Built the experience that supported a move to a larger manufacturer
Decisions in context
I became personnel manager in May 1995. Nevqoshi employed 260 people and recorded ₹41 crore revenue for FY 1996. I led nine colleagues through two leads with ₹1.1 crore annual function expense under the works director. The promotion changed my responsibility from completing assigned work to ensuring that a team could explain and support people decisions. I learned that a policy could be clear on paper while managers described it differently in practice. Records, operating requirements and professional advice needed to be connected without allowing the personnel team to assume authority it did not hold. This period developed my ability to recognise when a practical question needed another specialist or an explicit decision, and when an employee needed a better explanation of something the enterprise had already agreed.
Reason for the move
Joined Zevrashi as site HR manager in July 2005
- Sector
- Manufacturing of mechanical components
- Ownership
- Regional founder-owned private business
- Company scale
- ₹8 crore company revenue, FY ending March 1987
- Employees
- 95 company employees
- Geography
- Tamil Nadu industrial workplace
- Reporting to
- Personnel Manager
- Team
- Worked alongside three personnel colleagues; no supervisory remit
- Financial scope
- No delegated expenditure authority
Mandate
Support personnel administration and learn how factory commitments were recorded
Outcomes
- Began professional work after social-work study
- Learned factory personnel records and employee communication
- Built experience before receiving a management remit
Decisions in context
I started at Nevqoshi in July 1986, immediately after completing my social-work degree in June. The manufacturer employed 95 people and recorded ₹8 crore revenue for FY ending March 1987. I worked alongside three personnel colleagues under the personnel manager, without supervisory responsibility or authority to commit expenditure. The early role involved learning the records and conversations through which decisions reached the factory workforce. I saw that an administrative entry could sit inside a much larger personal circumstance, and that an explanation needed to be accurate without promising something the enterprise had not approved. I was not yet a policy owner or decision maker. The experience established the beginning of a continuous manufacturing people career and an interest in keeping the institution's account connected to the colleague's understanding.
Reason for the move
Promoted to personnel manager in May 1995
What I am looking for next
I would consider one first outside appointment where workforce experience could help directors examine the commitments inside organisational change. A manufacturing or industrial-service enterprise entering a group, developing international assignments or reviewing people decision authority could make use of that perspective. I would need to understand its commercial model, technical responsibilities and financial choices beyond my HR experience. My current role carries no statutory seat or equity, and I do not claim independence solely on that basis. The fictional preparation shows IICA registration in April 2026, with the proficiency assessment unfinished and no exemption. Twenty-two provisional days would have to include induction, reading, travel and exceptional demands as well as meetings. Employer consent and qualified relationship review would precede acceptance. I would value a chair who expects contribution beyond a specialist brief and helps a first-time director recognise when an employment question belongs in collective oversight rather than an instruction to management.