The lower ratio needed a better explanation

I put the lower cost-per-policy number in the opening slide. It seemed to show that our service organisation had handled growth more efficiently. The numerator had risen from ₹4.2 crore to ₹4.32 crore, while policy-years had risen from 36,000 to 48,000. The resulting unit cost fell from roughly ₹1,167 to ₹900. Operations then asked me to look at the people covered. Covered life-years had moved from 84,000 to 86,000, leaving that unit cost close to ₹500 in both periods. The mix of family and individual contracts had changed. I had chosen a real number and given it too broad a meaning.

I grew up in Aligarh and completed commerce at the fictional Zarqemi Commerce College in May 1995. I joined Talzuni Diagnostic Services that July as a billing analyst. The company employed 130 people and earned ₹18 crore revenue for the year ending March 1996. I worked in a six-person billing group without staff or spending authority. A diagnostic bill could contain several services, and a lower average bill did not necessarily mean any individual service had become cheaper. Clinical decisions belonged to qualified colleagues. My job was to understand the financial record well enough to explain it accurately.

In June 2001 I became branch-finance manager. Talzuni had 260 employees and ₹49 crore revenue for FY ending March 2002. I led eleven finance colleagues through two supervisors within ₹74 lakh annual expense. Branch discussions brought staffing, service mix and contractual terms into the account. I learned that a cost comparison could be arithmetically correct and still omit the condition that made one arrangement different from another. A part-time finance diploma at Olqavi Finance Institute, completed in November 2007, gave me a more formal way to examine those investment and funding questions while remaining employed.

Zevqari hired me as expense controller in September 2008. The fictional health insurer then had 160 employees and ₹180 crore gross written premium for the year ending March 2009. Fourteen finance colleagues worked through two leads within ₹1.2 crore annual function expense. Moving from a service provider to an insurer changed the meaning of the numbers around me. Premium was not simply the provider revenue I had known, and claims required professional assessment rather than a finance preference. I concentrated on explaining expense commitments and the operational work behind them.

I became head of financial planning and analysis in April 2014. Zevqari had 270 employees and ₹430 crore gross written premium for FY ending March 2015. Twenty-three colleagues worked through three leads within ₹3.1 crore annual expense. The role brought me into proposals before the contract was signed. I began asking which part of a quote varied with volume, which part remained payable and what the company would have to provide internally. A cheaper external line could conceal more supervision or a longer commitment elsewhere in the plan.

The CFO appointment followed in January 2020. Today I lead 34 colleagues through five heads within ₹5.6 crore FY 2026–27 finance-function expense. The company has 410 employees, fourteen branches and ₹940 crore gross written premium for FY ending March 2026. Assets of ₹1,420 crore describe its balance sheet rather than its income or an unrestricted spending balance. CEO Rhea Zelmethi holds enterprise recommendations, and Harish Velqazi retains actuarial responsibility. I attend board discussions as an executive without a statutory seat or vote.

The service-cost review led us to retain both policy-year and covered-life-year views, with further work on the activities each measure explained. The hospital advance proposal was declined after its ₹40 lakh projected discount was set beside ₹64 lakh of assumed annual funding cost. In the shareholder-funding discussion, ₹32 crore received could not be treated as ₹80 crore available merely because the larger plan had been approved. A new processing agreement required a three-year base commitment and internal supervision, even though its first-year financial account was lower than the previous minimum on the reviewed volume.

I want those consequences visible. The ₹24 lakh service-analysis programme and ₹19 lakh advance review were expenses, not invisible prerequisites to an improvement story. The remaining ₹48 crore of shareholder funding was still conditional at the profile date. The processing contract's ₹5.41 crore first-year account included provider charges, transition and additional oversight; it did not prove better claims decisions. Finance should make room for operating evidence that supports or challenges the recommendation after approval.

I have no statutory directorships. In this fictional record I registered with the IICA independent directors databank in May 2026, with assessment preparation unfinished and no exemption claimed. Twenty-two days a year is a provisional allowance for one first external role. I would bring a habit of examining the unit, the funding state and the commitment before agreeing that a number represents a saving. I would also bring the willingness to correct my own opening slide when a colleague shows that its meaning is too simple.

Open to Board appointments

Languages / English · Hindi · Urdu