Skip to website
Imtiaz QavzethiChief Financial Officer · Essays & perspective

Imtiaz Qavzethi · Chief Financial Officer · India

Learn what each financial unit represents

Jan 2020 — Present

Chief Financial Officer

Zevqari Health Assurance

Sector
Health-insurance finance
Ownership
Domestic industrial holding company 56%, private-equity investor 34%, employee vehicle 10%; no personal holding
Company scale
₹940 crore gross written premium, FY ending March 2026; ₹1,420 crore assets are a separate balance-sheet measure
Employees
410 company employees
Geography
Raipur headquarters and fourteen branches
Reporting to
CEO Rhea Zelmethi
Team
Thirty-four finance colleagues through five heads
Financial scope
₹5.6 crore FY 2026–27 finance-function expense; investment, actuarial, medical and claims authority remain separately assigned

Mandate

Make service-cost and funding comparisons reflect the commitments the enterprise will actually carry

Outcomes

  • Corrected an efficiency claim affected by the policy mix
  • Declined an advance whose modelled funding cost exceeded its discount
  • Separated received funding from conditional contributions in the expansion account
  • Included minimums, transition and internal oversight in provider economics

Decisions in context

I became CFO in January 2020 and now lead thirty-four colleagues through five heads. The ₹5.6 crore FY 2026–27 function account describes my direct expense responsibility, while ₹940 crore premium and ₹1,420 crore assets describe different aspects of the employer. Rhea holds enterprise recommendations, and Harish retains actuarial responsibility. I present to directors without a statutory seat or vote. The role requires me to make financial comparisons useful before a decision and honest after it. That includes correcting a ratio I had initially presented too confidently, retaining the cost of reviewing a declined proposal and reporting funding that remains conditional. I want operating colleagues to recognise their work in the financial account rather than see it reduced to whichever denominator gives the most attractive result. A first external board contribution would require preparation, consent and a different relationship to management authority from the one I exercise here.

Reason for the move

Current appointment; preparing for one first external board role

Apr 2014 — Dec 2019

Head of Financial Planning and Analysis

Zevqari Health Assurance

Sector
Health-insurance planning and service economics
Ownership
Privately held corporate-backed insurer
Company scale
₹430 crore gross written premium, FY ending March 2015
Employees
270 company employees at promotion
Geography
Indian branches and a Raipur central finance office
Reporting to
Chief Financial Officer
Team
Twenty-three colleagues through three leads
Financial scope
₹3.1 crore annual planning and finance-support expense

Mandate

Connect proposed operating arrangements with their complete expense and funding account

Outcomes

  • Brought contract minimums and retained internal work into proposal reviews
  • Separated forecast benefits from implementation costs
  • Prepared broader finance recommendations for executive scrutiny

Decisions in context

The planning appointment began in April 2014 with twenty-three colleagues and three leads. We worked within ₹3.1 crore annual expense in a 270-person insurer reporting ₹430 crore gross written premium for FY ending March 2015. I became involved before operating proposals were signed, when there was still room to change their terms or scope. A quoted fee could look attractive while requiring a minimum, a long commitment or additional internal supervision. I learned to ask colleagues to describe the work after implementation, then connect that description with the financial comparison. The role remained a management appointment without statutory directorship. It also taught me to distinguish the model used to choose from the evidence later used to judge the outcome. Promotion to CFO widened that responsibility to the enterprise account, where a convenient comparison could influence decisions well beyond the function that had first prepared it.

Reason for the move

Promoted to chief financial officer

Sept 2008 — Mar 2014

Expense Controller

Zevqari Health Assurance

Sector
Health-insurance expense control
Ownership
Privately held domestic insurer
Company scale
₹180 crore gross written premium, FY ending March 2009
Employees
160 company employees at entry
Geography
Indian operating network and central expense-control function
Reporting to
Finance Director
Team
Fourteen finance colleagues through two leads
Financial scope
₹1.2 crore annual finance-function expense; no medical, coverage or actuarial delegation

Mandate

Explain expense commitments without confusing provider revenue, insurer premium and claims obligations

Outcomes

  • Developed a service-based account of operating expense
  • Connected supplier terms with internal responsibilities
  • Learned the professional boundaries of insurance finance

Decisions in context

I moved to Zevqari in September 2008 after thirteen years in diagnostic-service finance. Fourteen colleagues and two leads worked within ₹1.2 crore annual function expense. The employer had 160 employees and ₹180 crore gross written premium for FY ending March 2009. The move required new learning: premium was not the service revenue I had previously reconciled, and a claims estimate was not a number to adjust to make an expense plan more comfortable. I focused on the commitments finance could explain while seeking the assessments of the appropriate specialists. Supplier arrangements and internal service work became recurring subjects because the quoted external price rarely described every responsibility retained by the insurer. The appointment gave me a foundation in insurance expense control and led to a planning role where those questions could be considered before management had committed itself to a particular operating arrangement.

Reason for the move

Promoted to head of financial planning and analysis

Jun 2001 — Aug 2008

Branch-finance manager

Talzuni Diagnostic Services

Sector
Diagnostic-service branch finance
Ownership
Privately owned healthcare-services company
Company scale
₹49 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2002
Employees
260 company employees at promotion
Geography
Indian diagnostic branches and a shared finance group
Reporting to
Group Financial Controller
Team
Eleven finance colleagues through two supervisors
Financial scope
₹74 lakh annual finance expense; clinical decisions remained with qualified service leaders

Mandate

Explain branch cost and service mix in a form operating colleagues could use

Outcomes

  • Examined the conditions behind supplier and customer price comparisons
  • Connected branch activity with its staffing and expense account
  • Completed a part-time finance diploma in November 2007

Decisions in context

The branch-finance role began in June 2001 with eleven colleagues and two supervisors. My ₹74 lakh annual function expense sat within a 260-person company earning ₹49 crore revenue for FY ending March 2002. I worked with branch leaders on staffing, service mix and contractual terms while clinical decisions stayed with qualified colleagues. The experience made me attentive to comparisons that were correct mathematically but incomplete commercially. A different mix of services could change an average bill, and a price concession could require a payment condition that altered its value. Part-time study at Olqavi Finance Institute, completed in November 2007, helped me formalise those funding and investment questions. I moved to Zevqari to learn the insurer's side of the relationship, knowing that familiarity with a provider's accounts did not by itself establish competence in the insurer's professional judgements.

Reason for the move

Joined a health insurer to apply service-finance experience to a different business model

Jul 1995 — May 2001

Billing Analyst

Talzuni Diagnostic Services

Sector
Diagnostic billing and financial administration
Ownership
Privately held healthcare-services firm
Company scale
₹18 crore company revenue, FY ending March 1996
Employees
130 company employees at entry
Geography
Indian billing and service-administration office
Reporting to
Billing Supervisor
Team
Member of a six-person billing group; no direct reports
Financial scope
No independent spending or clinical authority

Mandate

Reconcile billed services and explain differences for supervisory review

Outcomes

  • Learned to distinguish a bill from the services within it
  • Prepared financial records without deciding clinical need
  • Developed the habit of checking a unit before comparing its price

Decisions in context

I completed commerce in May 1995 and joined Talzuni that July. I worked in a six-person billing group under supervision, with no direct reports or independent spending authority. The 130-person company recorded ₹18 crore revenue for FY ending March 1996. A bill could include several services, and the mix mattered when colleagues compared average amounts across branches or periods. My early work was to reconcile records and prepare explanations, not to decide whether a service was clinically required or to negotiate every commercial arrangement myself. I learned to ask what the counted unit represented before using it to describe performance. That habit became more useful as my responsibilities widened, although I would later need colleagues to remind me of it. Promotion to branch-finance manager created the opportunity to connect those records with staffing, contracts and operating decisions across a broader part of the business.

Reason for the move

Promoted to branch-finance manager

What I am looking for next

I would like a first external board role in a service business where the economics depend on understanding the unit of work, the terms of a contract or the timing of funding. The contribution should be complementary to experienced operating, legal and sector directors. I would remain CFO of Zevqari and would need employer consent, a relationship review and a calendar that supports preparation as well as attendance. Twenty-two days is an initial allowance rather than a promise that every proposed mandate will fit. The fictional record shows my May 2026 registration with the IICA databank; preparation for the assessment is still in progress, and I am not relying on an exemption. I hold no statutory seat and would not use a finance title to imply prior audit-committee chair experience. I would value a chair who wants specific analysis that helps the board choose, while expecting me to learn the business and respect the distinction between collective oversight and an executive instruction to management.