Senior vice president and chief information officer
Merrowind Electric Power Cooperative
- Sector
- Electricity generation and transmission for member distribution cooperatives
- Ownership
- Generation and transmission cooperative owned by seventeen distribution cooperatives; not listed
- Company scale
- US$1.46bn revenue in 2025; total assets US$4.9bn
- Employees
- 1,080
- Geography
- Oklahoma, southern Kansas and western Arkansas
- Reporting to
- Chief executive officer; reports on cyber risk to the board's audit and risk committee twice a year
- Team
- 6 direct reports; 186 technology colleagues and about 40 contractors
- Financial scope
- US$58m annual operating budget and about US$31m annual capital; US$38m approved for the shared billing replacement
Mandate
Establish which business systems Merrowind's operations depend on and protect them, renew the shared technology service used by member cooperatives and replace its 1990s billing system before vendor support ends.
Outcomes
- Moved fourteen operations-essential systems into a separate enclave; a planned test in November 2024 restored all of them from offline copies in 19 hours.
- Converted ten cooperatives and 120,000 accounts to the new billing platform in three waves, with first-cycle exceptions no higher than 0.6%.
- Reduced transformer connectivity errors in the shared outage model from about 11% to under 2%; correct first-device predictions rose from 58% to 87%.
- Built the large-load register that resolved 9.6 GW of data-centre enquiries into 41 projects and 4.1 GW, of which 610 MW had signed facilities agreements by June 2026.
Decisions in context
I joined Merrowind to answer a question its board had asked after the 2021 pipeline attack: could an attack on our office systems stop us operating? Answering it took a year and changed my remit. My team now runs corporate technology, cyber security across business and operational systems in partnership with our operations and compliance staff, data and analytics, and the shared service that provides billing, outage management, mapping and security monitoring to fourteen member cooperatives. I have led the enclave for operations-essential systems, the connectivity programme after the 2023 ice storm, the billing replacement and the large-load register. I report to our chief executive, present cyber risk to the audit and risk committee twice a year, design the board's annual tabletop exercise and took the large-load register to the full board in 2025. I am not a director of Merrowind or of any member cooperative.
Reason for the move
Current appointment; completing the final billing wave and the large-load contract requirements.
Vice president and chief information officer
Corvallen Energy Services
- Sector
- Competitive retail electricity supply to households and small businesses
- Ownership
- Privately held; owned by a private equity sponsor
- Company scale
- US$0.9bn–US$1.2bn annual revenue during tenure
- Employees
- About 520
- Geography
- Texas competitive electricity market
- Reporting to
- Chief executive officer; reported to the risk committee of the board of managers
- Team
- 5 direct reports; 64 technology colleagues
- Financial scope
- US$27m annual technology budget; systems billing about 410,000 customer accounts
Mandate
Replace an outsourced billing and enrolment platform that was producing errors and calls, and give the business systems it could change without a vendor's release cycle.
Outcomes
- Moved 410,000 accounts to an in-house billing and enrolment platform in 2017 with first-cycle exceptions of 0.8%.
- Reduced billing-related calls per thousand customers by 37% between 2016 and 2019.
- Held 61,000 bills affected by incomplete meter data after the February 2021 storm rather than send estimates, and paired the corrected bills with payment-plan offers.
- Supported the transfer of the customer book to the acquiring retailer in June 2021 without a missed bill cycle.
Decisions in context
Corvallen was a retail business in which technology was most of the operation. Customers enrolled online, switched readily and judged us mainly on the bill, which depended on meter data sent by the regulated wires utilities through the market's data exchange. When I arrived, billing ran on an outsourced platform whose vendor released changes twice a year, and bill errors drove about a third of our calls. I led the move to a platform we controlled, with parallel bill runs and a team of billing analysts who sat beside the call centre. During the February 2021 storm the decisions were about cash and fairness at once: wholesale losses were mounting, meter data was late, and I recommended holding bills rather than estimating them. I reported through those weeks to the risk committee of the sponsor's board of managers. The sale of the customer book that summer ended the role.
Reason for the move
The sponsor sold the customer book to a larger retailer in mid-2021 after storm losses, and my role ended with the transfer.
Director, customer information and billing systems
Hollensby Electric Company
- Sector
- Regulated electricity generation, transmission and distribution
- Ownership
- Investor-owned utility; subsidiary of a listed holding company
- Company scale
- US$1.7bn–US$2.0bn annual revenue during tenure
- Employees
- About 2,400
- Geography
- Kansas
- Reporting to
- Vice president, customer operations, with a dotted line to the chief information officer
- Team
- 3 managers; 41 colleagues
- Financial scope
- Billing for about 560,000 customer accounts; billing replacement budgeted at US$62m, final cost US$79m
Mandate
Take over a billing replacement that was behind schedule, bring it into service and then stabilise billing.
Outcomes
- Took the new billing system live in October 2012; about 38,000 bills were delayed or estimated in the first two cycles.
- Presented the conversion review to the audit committee in 2013 and led the stabilisation plan.
- Brought estimated bills back below 0.5% of each cycle by mid-2013.
- Worked with the rates department to reduce active rate and rider combinations from more than 900 to 410 by 2014.
Decisions in context
I inherited a billing replacement eighteen months into its life, with a vendor, an integrator and a business that each believed another party owned the design. I reorganised the programme around a single test plan and brought the system live in October 2012, later than planned and, as it turned out, not ready. The first two cycles produced about 38,000 delayed or estimated bills and several hundred complaints to the state commission. I presented the review to the audit committee, and the finding I owned was that we had converted every rate and rider combination without asking which were still needed. The stabilisation that followed took most of 2013: manual review queues, extra call-centre staff and a programme with the rates department to retire combinations nobody used. The episode is the reason I now insist that boards retire rate codes before conversion begins.
Reason for the move
Recruited by Corvallen Energy Services to lead technology at a retail electricity provider.
Manager, energy management and SCADA systems
Hollensby Electric Company
- Sector
- Regulated electricity generation, transmission and distribution
- Ownership
- Investor-owned utility; subsidiary of a listed holding company
- Company scale
- US$1.4bn–US$1.7bn annual revenue during tenure
- Employees
- About 2,300
- Geography
- Kansas
- Reporting to
- Director of system operations
- Team
- 14 engineers and technicians
- Financial scope
- US$9m annual operating budget; US$22m energy management system replacement
Mandate
Replace the control centre's energy management system and extend SCADA communications to every transmission substation.
Outcomes
- Replaced the energy management system in 2006 with a staged cutover and no loss of control-centre visibility.
- Extended SCADA communications to all 118 transmission substations.
- Prepared the control-centre systems for the first mandatory cyber security standards for the bulk power system, approved by federal regulators in 2008.
Decisions in context
This was my largest operational technology role. Hollensby's control centre ran on an energy management system near the end of its life, and several transmission substations still reported only by telephone. I led the replacement with a staged cutover, running old and new systems side by side for eleven weeks, and extended communications to every transmission substation. Towards the end of the period the first mandatory cyber security standards for the bulk power system were approved, and I helped define which of our control-centre systems they covered and what had to change. The work taught me the discipline of operating technology, where nothing goes live without a way back, and that discipline was the reason I was asked to take over billing. I left control systems reluctantly, and I still think the habits of a control room are useful on the business side.
Reason for the move
Asked to take over the billing replacement programme.
SCADA engineer, then supervisor, operations technology
Wessendine Public Power District
- Sector
- Electricity transmission and distribution
- Ownership
- Public power district governed by an elected board
- Company scale
- US$110m–US$140m annual revenue
- Employees
- About 260
- Geography
- Central Nebraska
- Reporting to
- Manager of engineering and operations
- Team
- Supervisor from 2000: 5 technicians
- Financial scope
- US$3.5m SCADA and communications upgrade
Mandate
Extend SCADA to the district's substations and modernise its operations communications.
Outcomes
- Extended SCADA monitoring and control from 9 to 46 substations.
- Replaced the district's radio network for crews and substations.
- Took the operations systems through the 2000 date change without a service interruption.
Decisions in context
Wessendine gave me my first full control-system programme and my first elected board. The district was customer-owned, its directors were farmers, merchants and a retired teacher, and they asked about our SCADA spending in terms of what their neighbours would notice. I extended monitoring and control from nine substations to forty-six, replaced the radio network the crews depended on and, from 2000, supervised the five technicians who maintained the district's operations technology. I studied for my master's degree in the evenings, which gave me the vocabulary of information systems to go with what I knew about protection relays and radio paths. The district was small enough that I saw every consequence of my work, and good enough to teach me that an elected board is a strength when management reports to it plainly.
Reason for the move
Recruited by Hollensby Electric Company to run a larger control-centre system.
Staking engineer, then engineering supervisor
Ossory Creek Electric Cooperative
- Sector
- Rural electricity distribution
- Ownership
- Member-owned distribution cooperative
- Company scale
- US$28m–US$34m annual revenue
- Employees
- About 70
- Geography
- North-central Oklahoma
- Reporting to
- Manager of engineering
- Team
- Supervisor from 1996: 4 staking technicians
- Financial scope
- Line extension and work-plan budgets of about US$4m a year
Mandate
Design line extensions and system improvements, then supervise staking and build the cooperative's first substation monitoring.
Outcomes
- Designed about 600 line extensions to farms, grain facilities and oil leases.
- Built the cooperative's first remote monitoring link to its 12 substations in 1996.
- Converted the paper system maps for two of five districts to a digital format.
Decisions in context
Ossory Creek was where I learnt what a cooperative is for. I designed line extensions for members who had often waited months for them, walked the routes with landowners and learnt to estimate a job from a pickup truck. The cooperative's knowledge of its own network lived on paper maps and in the heads of its line foremen, and an ice storm in my second winter showed me how quickly the two could disagree. I persuaded the manager to let me build a radio link to our substations, the cooperative's first remote monitoring, and began converting two districts' maps to a digital format. When I left for Nebraska I took with me a lasting respect for line crews and a habit of checking records against the line itself. That habit returned with me to Merrowind twenty-three years later.
Reason for the move
Moved to a larger utility to specialise in control systems.
What I am looking for next
I intend to remain at Merrowind until the fourth billing wave has run for a full year and the old system is switched off, which takes me to the spring of 2028. I am not in conversation with search firms about executive roles and would prefer not to be approached for them before then. Beyond that, if I considered an executive move, it would be to a utility or infrastructure operator, cooperative, public or investor-owned, facing a combination of core-system replacement, cyber exposure on the business side and uncertain large-load growth, where the chief information officer reports to the chief executive and is present when resource and rate decisions are framed rather than told about them afterwards. I would want responsibility for both business and operational technology security, or a clear partnership with whoever holds the latter, and authority over data that feeds board decisions. I would not be interested in a role defined mainly by a single vendor implementation or by cost reduction alone. In the nearer term my external contribution will be one non-executive seat, described on my readiness page, agreed with my chief executive and limited to the time I can genuinely give.