Hiroshi NakamuraChief Executive Officer · Essays & perspective

Hiroshi Nakamura · Chief Executive Officer · Japan

Six postings in one company, each with a different question

Representative Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

Hatsuseki Chemical Co., Ltd.

Sector
Electronic materials and specialty chemicals: high-purity process chemicals for semiconductor fabs and laminate resins, with a chlor-alkali business until its partial sale in October 2025
Ownership
Listed on the Prime Market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange; no controlling shareholder; an activist fund holds 5.9 per cent
Company scale
¥271.4 billion net sales and ¥25.8 billion operating income in the year to March 2026
Employees
6,320 after the transfer of 1,080 chlor-alkali employees
Geography
Tokyo head office; plants at Yonezawa, Ichihara, Tainan, Pyeongtaek, Rayong and Arizona; 34 per cent of a chlor-alkali company at Toyama
Reporting to
Board of directors, nine members with five independent outside directors; I am a member of the voluntary nomination advisory committee but leave its deliberations on succession
Team
Eleven executive officers report to me; 6,320 employees across the group
Financial scope
Group P&L and balance sheet; net assets about ¥296 billion; capital expenditure of ¥32–48 billion a year; ¥110 billion growth programme for Electronic Materials

Mandate

Raise returns above the cost of capital, answer the exchange's request on capital efficiency and decide the future of the founding business.

Outcomes

  • Disclosed altered certificates on 2,140 resin lots within six days of confirmation and rebuilt quality governance across nine plants.
  • Sold 33 of 41 cross-held positions for ¥49.3 billion and bought back ¥36.2 billion of shares.
  • Raised return on equity from 4.4 to 8.6 per cent; price-to-book ratio moved from 0.61 to 1.07.
  • Sold 66 per cent of the Toyama chlor-alkali business for ¥18.6 billion with all 1,080 employees' terms protected for three years.
  • Approved a ¥26 billion first phase in Arizona, which began supplying a customer's fab in August 2026.

Decisions in context

The nomination advisory committee proposed me as president in 2022, and the general meeting that June elected me a representative director. My mandate from the board was broad, but the exchange's request in early 2023 made it specific: show that our capital earns more than it costs, or change the portfolio until it does. Before that could begin, the Ichihara certificate disclosure in November 2022 tested whether the company would tell customers an uncomfortable truth quickly, and it set the tone for everything after. The four years since have been organised around a single table showing return on invested capital by business and plant. It led to the cross-shareholding sales, the public test for Functional Resins, the phased Arizona plant and the sale of control of the Toyama business. Eleven executive officers report to me, and I meet our five outside directors without the executive team twice a year.

Reason for the move

Current role. I intend to hand over at the June 2028 general meeting and leave the board at the same time.

Managing Executive Officer and President, Electronic Materials Company; Director from June 2020

Hatsuseki Chemical Co., Ltd.

Sector
High-purity acids, cleaning solutions and etchants for semiconductor fabs
Ownership
Internal company of a Prime Market-listed chemical manufacturer
Company scale
Electronic Materials sales of ¥118.4 billion in the year to March 2022, within group sales of ¥298.7 billion
Employees
2,450 in the business
Geography
Plants at Yonezawa, Tainan and Pyeongtaek; customers in Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, China and the United States
Reporting to
President and CEO; board member from June 2020
Team
2,450 employees; seven direct reports
Financial scope
Business P&L and about ¥24 billion a year of capital expenditure

Mandate

Grow the Electronic Materials business with the advanced-node fabs while keeping qualification and quality ahead of customers' audits.

Outcomes

  • Grew segment sales from ¥86.9 billion to ¥118.4 billion over three years.
  • Qualified our highest-purity cleaning chemistry at four new customer fabs.
  • Approved a ¥14 billion capacity expansion at Tainan, completed in 2023.
  • Opened a shared analytical centre at Yonezawa serving all three plants.

Decisions in context

I returned from Taiwan in April 2019 to lead the Electronic Materials Company, an internal division with its own P&L. The business was growing quickly with customers moving to finer process nodes, and the risk was that capacity and qualification would fall behind demand. I divided the work into three parts: qualify our highest-purity cleaning chemistry at new fabs, add capacity at Tainan where customers were nearest, and centralise ultra-trace analysis at Yonezawa so that all three plants measured the same way. Segment sales grew from ¥86.9 billion to ¥118.4 billion. I joined the board in June 2020, which gave me my first experience of approving matters outside my own business, including the internal audit reports on Ichihara that I later wished I had pressed harder. The nomination advisory committee proposed me as president in early 2022.

Reason for the move

Proposed by the nomination advisory committee and appointed president by the board.

President and Chairman of the Board

Hatsuseki Electronic Materials Taiwan Co., Ltd.

Sector
High-purity process chemicals for semiconductor fabs
Ownership
Wholly owned Taiwanese subsidiary of Hatsuseki Chemical Co., Ltd.
Company scale
About ¥31 billion of sales in the year to March 2019
Employees
420
Geography
One plant and a laboratory in Tainan, serving fabs in southern and northern Taiwan
Reporting to
President of the Electronic Materials Company in Tokyo
Team
420 employees; six direct reports
Financial scope
Full P&L and balance sheet of the subsidiary; capital expenditure of about ¥5 billion a year

Mandate

Double capacity for the most advanced grades and prepare the subsidiary for local leadership.

Outcomes

  • Doubled capacity for advanced-node grades within three years.
  • Cut the time to answer a customer quality query from five days to under one.
  • Appointed the subsidiary's first Taiwanese plant manager and handed him a plant with no open customer audit findings.
  • Raised sales from about ¥19 billion to about ¥31 billion.

Decisions in context

Tainan was the most demanding posting of my career. Our customers' fabs were twenty minutes away, and their quality engineers expected answers in hours. A Japanese subsidiary that referred every question to head office could not keep up, so I moved analytical authority to the plant and set a rule that every customer query would receive a substantive answer within a day. I chaired the subsidiary's board and reported to the head of the Electronic Materials Company in Tokyo. We doubled capacity for the most advanced grades, and sales rose from about ¥19 billion to about ¥31 billion. I learnt working Mandarin and, more usefully, learnt how slow a Japanese parent can look from outside. My last act was to appoint the subsidiary's first Taiwanese plant manager. He still runs it, and I regard that appointment as the best decision I made there.

Reason for the move

Recalled to Tokyo to lead the Electronic Materials Company.

General Manager, Corporate Planning Department

Hatsuseki Chemical Co., Ltd.

Sector
Diversified chemicals: chlor-alkali, laminate resins and electronic chemicals
Ownership
Widely held company quoted on the First Section of the Tokyo exchange, before the 2022 market reorganisation
Company scale
Group sales of about ¥236 billion in the year to March 2015
Employees
About 7,000
Geography
Tokyo head office; plants in Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and Thailand
Reporting to
President and CEO, with regular presentations to the board
Team
18 in corporate planning
Financial scope
No P&L; responsible for the medium-term plan, investment appraisal and the annual review of cross-held shares

Mandate

Prepare the company's medium-term plans and bring discipline to investment appraisal.

Outcomes

  • Wrote two medium-term plans and introduced a hurdle rate for all investments above ¥1 billion.
  • Prepared the investment case for the Pyeongtaek plant, approved in 2012 and opened in 2014.
  • Compiled the company's first full review of 46 cross-held stakes and proposed selling 30; six were sold.
  • Led the supply-chain review after the March 2011 earthquake.

Decisions in context

I came to Tokyo in July 2010 knowing plants and customers and almost nothing about capital markets. Corporate planning taught me to read our company the way an investor would. I wrote two medium-term plans, introduced a hurdle rate for every investment above ¥1 billion and prepared the case for our plant at Pyeongtaek in South Korea, which opened in 2014. After the March 2011 earthquake I led a review of single-source materials and plants without a backup, which changed how we stocked several critical inputs. My most important piece of work was one nobody had asked for: a review of every listed company whose shares we held. There were 46, worth about a fifth of our net assets. In 2014 I proposed selling thirty. The president agreed to six. I learnt that a correct proposal can still be early, and that being early has a cost.

Reason for the move

Asked to lead the Taiwanese subsidiary, our largest overseas operation.

Deputy Plant Manager, later Plant Manager, Yonezawa Plant

Hatsuseki Chemical Co., Ltd.

Sector
High-purity process chemicals for semiconductor and display makers
Ownership
Plant of a listed chemical manufacturer
Company scale
Plant output of about ¥38 billion a year by 2010
Employees
290
Geography
Yonezawa, Yamagata Prefecture; customers in Japan and East Asia
Reporting to
General manager of the electronic chemicals business; plant manager from April 2006
Team
290; eight section chiefs reporting to me as plant manager
Financial scope
Plant conversion budget of about ¥9 billion and capital expenditure of ¥2–4 billion a year

Mandate

Raise purity and consistency to the levels customers' fabs required and pass their audits without findings.

Outcomes

  • Built an analytical laboratory able to detect metallic impurities at the levels customers measured.
  • Reduced customer audit findings from an average of seven per audit to fewer than two.
  • Raised plant output by about 60 per cent without a lost-time injury in four years.
  • Restarted production after the regional power interruption in March 2011 through a team trained to act without head-office instruction.

Decisions in context

The Yonezawa plant had grown out of the acid project I worked on at Toyama, and I arrived as deputy manager in April 2003, becoming plant manager three years later. Customers' auditors visited constantly, and they asked about sampling, filtration and container cleaning in ways our own managers had stopped doing. We built a laboratory able to see what their laboratories saw, and we stopped arguing with their results. Average audit findings fell from about seven to fewer than two, and output grew about 60 per cent. I left for Tokyo in mid-2010, but the training we had put in place was tested the following March, when the earthquake interrupted regional power. My successor and the section chiefs restarted the plant safely without needing anyone in head office. That is the result I am proudest of, even though I was no longer there.

Reason for the move

Brought to head office to run corporate planning.

Process Engineer, later Section Chief, High-Purity Acid Development, Toyama Works

Hatsuseki Chemical Co., Ltd.

Sector
Chlor-alkali: caustic soda, chlorine, hydrochloric acid and derivatives
Ownership
Founding works of a listed chemical manufacturer
Company scale
Works output of about ¥55 billion a year
Employees
About 1,400 at the works
Geography
Toyama, Toyama Prefecture
Reporting to
Electrolysis section manager; from 1995, head of the works' development department
Team
Five engineers as section chief from 1998
Financial scope
Development budget of about ¥600 million a year from 1998

Mandate

Run electrolysis efficiently, then develop hydrochloric acid pure enough for semiconductor customers.

Outcomes

  • Reduced power consumption per tonne of caustic soda by about 4 per cent through cell and brine changes.
  • Developed the purification route that made Toyama acid the feedstock for our first electronic-grade products.
  • Qualified the first electronic-grade acid with two Japanese semiconductor makers in 1999.
  • Wrote the process specifications later transferred to the Yonezawa plant.

Decisions in context

I joined Hatsuseki in April 1989 and spent my first six years on the electrolysis cells at Toyama, where my grandfather and father had worked. The job was mostly about electricity, which was the largest cost, and about brine, whose impurities shortened the life of the membranes. In 1995 I moved to the works' development department to help purify hydrochloric acid for semiconductor customers, and from 1998 I led the team of five that did it. We learnt to measure metals in parts per trillion and to doubt any result we could not repeat. Our first electronic-grade acid was qualified by two Japanese chip makers in 1999, and the process specifications we wrote became the basis of the Yonezawa plant. These fourteen years gave me both the chemistry and the conviction that a limit agreed with a customer must be one the process can keep.

Reason for the move

Sent to Yonezawa to help run the plant that commercialised the acid work.

What I am looking for next

I am not seeking another executive role. My remaining task as president is to hand Hatsuseki to a successor at the June 2028 general meeting with the Arizona plant running, the Functional Resins test answered one way or the other and the capital policy carried into a new medium-term plan that my successor, not I, will write. After that I will leave the board.

From 2027, with my board's consent, I would like to serve as an independent outside director of one Japanese listed manufacturer outside chemicals and semiconductors, and after 2028 perhaps of two. The companies I could help most are those facing the decisions I have faced: shares trading below book value, cross-held stakes still on the balance sheet, a founding business that no longer earns its capital, a quality system that has not yet been tested by a whistleblower, or a tradition of presidents choosing their own successors. I would want to sit on the nomination committee and, after learning the company, to chair it. I would not take a seat at a company where a former president remains chairman unless the board had already decided to change that.