- Sector
- Workbenches and drawer cabinets for non-hazardous industrial assembly and inspection
- Ownership
- Employee trust 52%, regional industrial investor 33%, founder 15%
- Company scale
- ₹314 crore revenue and ₹26.2 crore operating profit, FY ending March 2026
- Employees
- 820 company employees
- Geography
- Rajkot manufacturing and product base with Indian industrial customers
- Reporting to
- CEO Vikram Nerzhani
- Team
- Ninety-six product colleagues through six managers
- Financial scope
- ₹18 crore annual product-development expense; no independent factory-capital approval
Mandate
Make the product proposition match the customer's task, configuration and continuing delivery arrangement
Outcomes
- Introduced two depth propositions with 84 workstations sold by March 2026, 52 wider and 32 narrower
- Corrected task-price presentations while retaining the genuine base option
- Kept crate returns and workplace evaluations within defined programmes with unresolved outcomes visible
Decisions in context
As CPO I have to connect several accounts that can each look reasonable in isolation: the product drawing, the commercial example, the delivery route and the experience of trying the furniture in a workplace. Ninety-six colleagues through six managers support that responsibility within ₹18 crore annual product-development expense. Vikram owns executive commitments, while Sana coordinates design with the proper engineering and quality owners. The compactness correction was a personal test because I had approved the claim. The later configuration, crate and evaluation decisions made the same general responsibility concrete in different ways. I want the product office to describe the work the offer creates for the customer and for our colleagues after the initial sale. That does not give me independent capital authority or the right to replace technical assessment with a persuasive product account.
Reason for the move
Current appointment; preparing for one first external board role alongside executive duties
- Sector
- Industrial work surfaces and storage furniture
- Ownership
- Employee trust, regional industrial investor and founder interests
- Company scale
- ₹246 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2018
- Employees
- 650 company employees at appointment
- Geography
- Rajkot and Indian industrial sales territories
- Reporting to
- Chief Executive Officer
- Team
- Sixty-two colleagues through five managers
- Financial scope
- ₹9.6 crore annual product expense
Mandate
Connect portfolio choices with delivery propositions and customer evaluation
Outcomes
- Brought the work after delivery into product-brief discussions
- Required demonstration configurations to identify the task being shown
- Linked range planning with the colleagues responsible for customer selection and receipt
Decisions in context
The vice-president role made the journey beyond the catalogue harder to ignore. Sixty-two colleagues and five managers worked within ₹9.6 crore annual product expense. We could develop an attractive arrangement and still leave a customer with unanswered questions about receiving, placing and trying it. I began asking product briefs to follow those steps alongside the feature account. That brought logistics and commercial colleagues into discussions that had previously concentrated on the furniture itself. Their objections often revealed a cost the product team had assumed somebody else would absorb. I also learned that a demonstration should identify the task it illustrates rather than present a tidy surface as a complete account of use. The CPO appointment followed a broader need to make these relationships part of the proposition the company was prepared to stand behind.
Reason for the move
Promoted to CPO with wider accountability for the complete offer
- Sector
- Workshop benches, drawer cabinets and related industrial furniture
- Ownership
- Employee trust and industrial-investor capital alongside the founder
- Company scale
- ₹172 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2013
- Employees
- 480 company employees at entry
- Geography
- Rajkot manufacturing base serving Indian workshops
- Reporting to
- Product Director
- Team
- Thirty-four colleagues through three managers
- Financial scope
- ₹4.2 crore annual range-management and development expense
Mandate
Define product choices around the work customers need to perform
Outcomes
- Examined incoming and unfinished work alongside the clean demonstration surface
- Separated a feature's appeal in a showroom from its role during ordinary use
- Built range discussions that included customer selection and commercial explanation
Decisions in context
I moved to Zerqeli because the range gave me a wider set of workshop tasks to understand. Thirty-four colleagues worked through three managers within ₹4.2 crore annual expense. A workbench and a drawer cabinet could be specified separately while the customer's task depended on how they were arranged together. I asked the team to observe that relationship without assuming every customer needed the same configuration. The observations were sometimes awkward for a clean range plan: a surface that looked generous in a photograph could be occupied by unfinished work halfway through the day. Product research helped us explain those differences, while engineering and quality retained the relevant assessments. The next appointment broadened the responsibility from the range itself to how the company would deliver, demonstrate and support the offer around it.
Reason for the move
Promoted to vice-president with a broader portfolio and delivery remit
- Sector
- Metal workshop furniture for regional industrial customers
- Ownership
- Founder-managed private enterprise with minority investment from a regional manufacturing group
- Company scale
- ₹96 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2007
- Employees
- 340 company employees at promotion
- Geography
- Western Indian manufacturing base and industrial accounts
- Reporting to
- Head of Product Planning
- Team
- Thirteen colleagues through two managers
- Financial scope
- ₹1.5 crore annual product expense
Mandate
Turn observations of customer work into coherent range and configuration choices
Outcomes
- Connected base items with the accessories required by a stated task
- Made the distinction between an observed need and a universal range claim explicit
- Completed part-time management study in November 2009 while remaining employed
Decisions in context
Product management gave me responsibility for turning research into a choice the company could explain and fund. Thirteen people through two managers supported the role within ₹1.5 crore annual product expense. I found that the same customer task could be described differently by the designer, the commercial team and the person preparing the quotation. Each might be accurate within a narrow account while the overall proposition remained incomplete. My work was to bring those accounts together early enough to change the offer. Part-time study at Zhevani Management Institute, completed in November 2009, helped me discuss the commercial consequence rather than rely on the strength of an observation alone. I moved to Zerqeli for a broader range responsibility and a chance to follow more of the customer's working arrangement across related products.
Reason for the move
Accepted a larger range leadership role at Zerqeli
- Sector
- Metal furniture for workshops and industrial storage
- Ownership
- Private business managed by its founder, with a regional manufacturing-group minority holding
- Company scale
- ₹44 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2001
- Employees
- 190 company employees at entry
- Geography
- Western Indian workshop and industrial customer settings
- Reporting to
- Product Research Lead
- Team
- Member of a six-person research group; no staff supervision
- Financial scope
- Research assignments agreed by the lead; no personal spending authority
Mandate
Observe customer tasks and record the context behind a furniture preference
Outcomes
- Documented what customers placed beside the product during an ordinary task
- Kept one user's preference distinct from a general requirement
- Learned to explain observations to product and commercial colleagues without assuming technical approval
Decisions in context
I completed industrial-design study in May 2000 and began at Vorzena that July. In the six-person research group, my role was to watch and ask rather than decide what the range should contain. I had no direct reports or expenditure delegation. The useful observations were often small: an unfinished item occupying the clear surface shown in a brochure, a frequently used drawer blocked by a temporary container, or a person borrowing another table to finish the task. I learned to record the circumstances instead of turning one arrangement into a universal preference. The researcher also needed to explain why an observation mattered to colleagues responsible for manufacturing and sales. That discipline prepared me for product management, where I would have to choose among competing requirements and accept the commercial consequences of the recommendation.
Reason for the move
Promoted to product manager with team and expense responsibility
What I am looking for next
I would consider a first non-executive role where the board wants to understand what its product promises require from customers and from the organisation after purchase. I would remain CPO at Zerqeli. A suitable industrial business might be revising its configuration choices, evaluation route or continuing delivery arrangement. I would want to learn its economics and the experience already present among directors before suggesting how my perspective could help. My own career contains no statutory directorship, and this fictional account records databank registration in August 2026 with assessment preparation still ahead. Twenty-two days annually is a provisional allowance, to be tested against employer consent, committee work, travel and exceptional demands. I am not looking for a role in which I become an external product manager or offer technical certification from the boardroom. I would contribute by asking whether the proposition, its evidence and the customer's actual undertaking remain aligned, while learning the wider financial and collective responsibilities that executive product work alone does not supply.