I had counted the parts and missed the job

The arithmetic behind a product promise can be simple enough that nobody checks it carefully. I learned that when a tray described as supporting six jobs held enough of one component for six and enough of the other for three. The drawing was tidy and the larger compartment looked generous. I had approved the proposition without following the complete kit through the customer's defined task.

My career began in June 1995 after design studies at Pelqerni Design College. I joined Orqelni Product Studio as a junior designer within a five-person team. Senior designers held client and technical approval authority. I prepared drawings and observed how people used ordinary workplace products, but I was initially more attentive to the object than to the sequence around it. A neat arrangement could appear finished while leaving the user to solve the next step.

In April 2001 I became a design lead, coordinating six colleagues with ₹76 lakh annual studio delivery expense. Client projects taught me that the same object could be understood differently depending on how it arrived, what accompanied it and who used it next. I learned to ask for the task and the working context before judging a layout. Clients and qualified technical colleagues retained their own acceptance decisions. My responsibility was to make the proposed product useful enough to deserve that examination.

I joined Nalqevri Component Trays in April 2008 as range manager. Eight product colleagues worked within ₹1.4 crore annual expense on trays for ordinary assembly components. Moving into a manufacturer meant that a design decision affected a continuing range, commercial material and the people asked to support it later. I learned to compare a custom request with the work already promised to other customers. A request could be legitimate without being a suitable addition to the standard portfolio.

Promotion to head of product in April 2015 gave me responsibility for twelve colleagues,₹2.9 crore annual expense and ₹90 lakh separately approved programme capital. In 2018 I supported the six-job refill proposition that later needed correction. The defined job used four clips and two spacers, but the tray held twenty-four clips and only six spacers. The limiting component allowed three nominal kits. We revised the layout and its explanation; I did not describe the correction as proof of a higher production rate.

I became CPO in April 2021 and now lead sixteen colleagues through two leads. Annual product expense is ₹3.8 crore, with ₹1.6 crore capital approved separately. Nalqevri employed 148 people in March 2026 and recorded ₹62 crore revenue and ₹4.9 crore operating profit in FY 2025–26. Founders hold 65%, an industrial investor 25% and employees 10%. I hold no shares or statutory seat. CEO Suresh Velqnari is my reporting manager, and engineering head Bina Terqeshi retains suitability, safety and release authority.

The orientation study reminded me that a product's information is partly physical. A tray and a layout card could each be clear when arranged by the designer, but a later user might receive the tray turned around. Eleven of thirty-two defined handover tasks were misread. We funded an asymmetrical reference feature and a corresponding drawing treatment. The repeat exercise improved the observed interpretation, but five tasks still needed assistance. The product account had to retain that limit rather than announce that mistakes had been eliminated.

The fourteen-variant request tested a different part of product leadership. It carried an appealing ₹3.6 crore prospective order forecast, but no confirmed order programme. The initial plan would occupy nine of our sixteen product colleagues for six months. I proposed a smaller feasibility stage so management could learn about the application before committing the wider range. Two of four prototypes met the defined review criteria; two remained pending. That result was useful because it supported a narrower decision, not because it could be reported as fourteen products ready to sell.

I want colleagues to bring the complete task and the remaining work into the same discussion. That includes asking what another team must do after a product decision is approved and what capacity we give up by accepting a request. A first outside board contribution would use that experience to examine management's product commitments without taking over engineering release or the customer's process. My governance preparation remains incomplete, and I would approach such a role with that limitation visible.

Open to Board appointments · Executive opportunities

Languages / Kannada · Hindi · English