- Sector
- System integration, managed IT services and offshore software delivery
- Ownership
- Founder's family 54 per cent; Kandimara Capital 38 per cent; employees 8 per cent
- Company scale
- S$286 million revenue and S$34 million EBITDA in 2025
- Employees
- 2,180
- Geography
- Singapore headquarters; operations in Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh City)
- Reporting to
- Chief executive; attends the board and its audit and risk committee
- Team
- 46 finance colleagues in four countries through five direct reports
- Financial scope
- Group reporting, tax, treasury in five currencies, a S$95 million bank facility and bid approval above S$10 million
Mandate
Make a project-based business financeable on terms that survive its own volatility, following the 2019 private-equity investment.
Outcomes
- Refinanced the S$95 million facility in 2022 with covenants that absorbed a RM14.2 million project loss
- Reduced Malaysian public-sector collection days from 171 to 109
- Restored the Vietnam centre's gross margin from 14 to 21 per cent
- Shortened the group monthly close from twenty-two to twelve working days
Decisions in context
I became group CFO a month after Kandimara Capital completed its investment, which brought a shareholder that reads cash flow closely and a board expecting forecasts it could hold management to. My first task was a monthly close that four country teams could deliver on the same basis. The larger question was how a project business could borrow on terms that would survive its own bad quarters. The 2022 refinancing, the acceptance desk in Kuala Lumpur and the wage-linked rate reviews in Ho Chi Minh City all came from that question. I report to the chief executive, attend every board and committee meeting, and remain an executive director of our Malaysian subsidiary. I have disagreed openly with both the founder and our investor; the board has supported me on some points and not others, which is how it should work.
Reason for the move
Current appointment; seeking one compatible independent directorship with the board's consent.
- Sector
- System integration and managed services for agencies and banks
- Ownership
- Founder-owned until the March 2019 private-equity investment
- Company scale
- Group revenue of about S$198 million in 2018; Malaysian subsidiary about RM410 million
- Employees
- About 1,650 at period end
- Geography
- Malaysia, Singapore and, from 2015, Vietnam
- Reporting to
- Group chief financial officer; Malaysian country managing director
- Team
- 24 finance colleagues in Kuala Lumpur and Ho Chi Minh City
- Financial scope
- Malaysian subsidiary reporting and tax, project control, and the Vietnam centre's finance from its opening
Mandate
Bring project control and cash discipline to the largest operating subsidiary and build finance for a new delivery centre.
Outcomes
- Introduced a monthly estimate-to-complete review for fixed-price contracts above RM5 million
- Built finance, payroll and intercompany pricing for the Ho Chi Minh City centre with external advisers
- Managed the change from goods and services tax to sales and service tax in 2018
- Appointed executive director of the Malaysian subsidiary in 2016
Decisions in context
Ravendara's founder hired me to make the Malaysian subsidiary's project numbers dependable. I started with a monthly estimate-to-complete review for every fixed-price contract above RM5 million, chaired jointly with the delivery head, so that changes in remaining effort reached the accounts in the month they were known. In 2015 we opened a delivery centre in Ho Chi Minh City, and I built its finance function, payroll and intercompany pricing with advisers who knew the Vietnamese rules better than I did. Malaysia introduced goods and services tax in 2015 and replaced it with sales and service tax in 2018, and both changes ran through our contract billing. My appointment as an executive director of the subsidiary in 2016 gave me statutory responsibility for its accounts and taught me how differently a director reads a paper from the person who wrote it.
Reason for the move
Asked by the board to become group CFO when the private-equity investment completed.
- Sector
- Application outsourcing and maintenance
- Ownership
- Regional hub of a privately owned Australian outsourcing company
- Company scale
- About S$140 million regional revenue at period end
- Employees
- About 1,300 in the region at period end
- Geography
- Singapore hub; delivery teams in Manila and Ho Chi Minh City; clients in five countries
- Reporting to
- Regional managing director; functional line to the parent's chief financial officer in Sydney
- Team
- 14 accountants and analysts
- Financial scope
- Regional consolidation in five currencies, rate-card pricing support and intercompany charges
Mandate
Produce a regional result the parent could trust and explain margin movement by client and delivery location.
Outcomes
- Cut the regional close from fifteen to nine working days
- Introduced margin reporting by client and delivery location
- Documented how wage increases eroded fixed annual rate cards
Decisions in context
Corvalith moved me to Singapore and into a different economic model. Its clients bought engineering capacity under annual rate cards, delivered from Manila and Ho Chi Minh City, and the regional result combined five currencies every month. My team of fourteen consolidated the region for an Australian parent whose finance director wanted margin explained by client and by delivery location rather than as one regional figure. That analysis showed something the sales team had sensed but not measured: wage increases in the delivery countries were eroding fixed rate cards faster than currency movements, and hedging addressed only the smaller exposure. I presented that finding to the parent in 2012. It changed how renewals were priced, although slowly. The role also taught me to work across a functional reporting line without losing the trust of the local managing director I sat beside.
Reason for the move
Wanted responsibility for a whole finance function in a business that delivered projects as well as services.
Jul 2004 — Dec 2009
Finance manager, bids and contracts
Merbalang Teknologi
- Sector
- System integration for agencies, utilities and banks
- Ownership
- Family-owned private company
- Company scale
- About RM180 million annual revenue at period end
- Employees
- About 620 at period end
- Geography
- Malaysia, with projects in Indonesia
- Reporting to
- Finance director; worked daily with the head of sales
- Team
- Six bid and contract analysts
- Financial scope
- Pricing for bids between RM20 million and RM150 million, and the register of bonds, retentions and payment milestones
Mandate
Put a financial view of payment terms, bonds and contract risk into every significant bid.
Outcomes
- Built a register of performance bonds and retention sums across all live contracts
- Added a financing charge for payment timing to bid pricing
- Reviewed about forty bids a year with sales and delivery leads
Decisions in context
Bid finance placed me between the sales team, which needed a competitive price, and the finance director, who needed the company to be paid. Public-sector and utility tenders came with performance bonds, retention sums and payment schedules tied to acceptance certificates, so a bid's real cost depended on events after delivery. I built a register of every bond and retention and began charging each bid for the time between completing work and receiving cash. We lost some tenders on price because of it. We also won one I should have priced higher, a state-agency system whose final acceptance came fourteen months late. That contract taught me more than any of the bids we lost. By 2009 I reviewed about forty bids a year and wanted a role that combined that commercial view with responsibility for a whole regional result.
Reason for the move
Recruited to Singapore for a regional controller role in an outsourcing business.
Mar 2000 — Jun 2004
Project accountant, later project controller
Merbalang Teknologi
- Sector
- System integration for agencies, utilities and banks
- Ownership
- Family-owned private company
- Company scale
- About RM110 million annual revenue at period end
- Employees
- About 430 at period end
- Geography
- Malaysia, with projects in Indonesia
- Reporting to
- Finance manager; worked with project directors
- Team
- No direct reports at first; two project accountants from 2002
- Financial scope
- Cost-to-complete reporting and billing for nine fixed-price contracts
Mandate
Keep project revenue, cost and billing consistent with the real progress of delivery.
Outcomes
- Produced monthly cost-to-complete reports for nine fixed-price contracts
- Reconciled milestone billing with acceptance status on each project
- Joined technical reviews to test estimates of remaining effort
Decisions in context
Merbalang hired me because it had a project in Jakarta and needed a project accountant who could work in both countries' paperwork. I stayed in Kuala Lumpur after that project closed. My job was to report, each month, how much of each fixed-price contract was complete and what remained to be spent. I learnt quickly that the percentage is only as honest as the estimate of remaining effort, and that an engineer's optimism becomes reported profit within a month. I began attending technical reviews so that I could ask about estimates in the engineers' own terms rather than challenge them from a spreadsheet. By 2002 I had two project accountants working with me. The role gave me the habit I still rely on most: treating the estimate to complete as the most important number in a services company's accounts.
Reason for the move
Promoted to lead bid and contract finance.
Aug 1996 — Feb 2000
Audit associate, later audit senior
Sentanaya & Rekan
- Sector
- Audit and accounting services
- Ownership
- Partnership of Indonesian accountants
- Company scale
- Mid-sized local firm; fee income not disclosed to staff
- Employees
- About 180 at period end
- Geography
- Jakarta and Surabaya
- Reporting to
- Audit manager and engagement partner
- Team
- Led field teams of three to four associates from 1998
- Financial scope
- Statutory audits of manufacturing and trading companies
Mandate
Complete audit fieldwork to the engagement partner's standard and identify matters needing partner judgement.
Outcomes
- Led fieldwork on eleven statutory audits as a senior
- Prepared going-concern working papers for clients with foreign-currency borrowings during 1998
- Trained new associates in stock-count and receivables procedures
Decisions in context
I joined Sentanaya & Rekan straight from university and spent my first eighteen months on stock counts, receivables confirmations and bank reconciliations. Then the currency crisis of 1997 and 1998 changed every engagement. Clients with dollar borrowings and rupiah income found that a profitable year no longer protected them, and I prepared going-concern working papers for several of them under the engagement partner's direction. I did not make those judgements, but I saw how they were reached, and how much depended on which currency the cash arrived in and when. I became an audit senior in 1998 and led small field teams. By 1999 I wanted to work inside a business rather than review one afterwards, and a system integrator with a Jakarta project gave me that opening. The crisis years remain the most useful training I have had.
Reason for the move
Moved into industry to work on project finance for a system integrator.
What I am looking for next
I am looking for one independent directorship alongside my executive role, not a change of employer. The company I have in mind earns its revenue through projects or long contracts, carries obligations that run ahead of its cash, and perhaps deals in more than one currency: engineering services, logistics contracting, facilities management or a regional software company would all qualify. Singapore or Malaysia suits me; I have worked in both for over twenty-five years and understand their audit cycles. I would expect to join an audit and risk committee and, after a year of learning the company, to be considered for its chair if the board wanted that. I would not join a bank or a public-sector client of Ravendara, and I would decline a competitor. My board has agreed in principle to one external seat, subject to its review of the specific company. Twenty-four days a year is my planning figure, including preparation.