Chief product officer
Mukilvanam Homes
Apr 2022 — Present
- Sector
- Mid-income residential development and post-possession services
- Ownership
- Family-promoted private company; a domestic real-estate fund has held a 24 per cent minority stake since 2020
- Company scale
- ₹910 crore revenue and ₹1,180 crore of sales bookings in the year ended March 2026
- Employees
- About 1,050, excluding contractors' site workforce
- Geography
- Chennai headquarters; southern and western Chennai suburbs and Coimbatore
- Reporting to
- Managing director; presents a quarterly buyer and possession report to the board
- Team
- 69 colleagues through five leads: buyer app, owners' app, possession programme, design and research, and data
- Financial scope
- Product and digital budget of ₹34 crore a year; possession programme handling about 1,200 handovers a year
Mandate
Make the buyer's journey from booking to the end of the first year in the home verifiable at each stage, and decide which products the company should stop running.
Outcomes
- Replaced the app's completion percentage with dated, engineer-signed stage records across thirteen projects
- Linked each payment demand to its stage certificate and lender pack; median demand-to-receipt time fell from 39 to 21 days
- Closed the resident marketplace and rebuilt snag recording; median closure fell from 52 to 17 days
- Aligned the app's stage records with the quarterly project updates filed on the RERA portal
Decisions in context
This appointment brought product and possession under one remit for the first time. Before 2022 a buyer's journey belonged to sales until the agreement was signed, to finance during construction and to the projects team at handover. Each function kept its own records, and the buyer was left to reconcile them. I lead five teams covering the buyer app, the owners' app, the possession programme, design and research, and data. I report to the managing director and present a quarterly report to the board, where the fund's nominee asks the sharpest questions about cancellations and disputes. I do not set prices, approve drawings or certify stages. Each of the three cases on this site required one of those functions to accept a cost. My contribution was to show the buyer's side of the decision with figures, and then to see the work through on the sites.
Reason for the move
Current appointment; seeking one independent directorship alongside it, subject to employer consent.
Head of buyer journey and digital
Mukilvanam Homes
Sept 2018 — Mar 2022
- Sector
- Residential apartment development
- Ownership
- Family-owned private company; minority fund investment from 2020
- Company scale
- About ₹640 crore of sales bookings in the year ended March 2022
- Employees
- About 820 at period end
- Geography
- Chennai and Coimbatore
- Reporting to
- Managing director
- Team
- Twenty-two colleagues in product, customer-relations systems and the first possession desk
- Financial scope
- Digital budget of about ₹11 crore a year
Mandate
Bring booking, payment and handover records into one place for buyers after every ongoing project had been registered under RERA.
Outcomes
- Moved agreements, payment schedules and receipts into a single buyer app used by about 7,800 households
- Started weekly photographic site updates within a month of the 2020 site closures
- Wrote the first possession checklist used at joint inspections
Decisions in context
I joined shortly after every ongoing project had been registered under RERA, when the paperwork reaching buyers had multiplied. A buyer might hold an allotment letter, an agreement for sale, a payment schedule and a dozen receipts, each from a different office. The managing director asked me to bring them together. We built the first buyer app around documents and receipts rather than marketing content. When sites closed in 2020, buyers wanted to know whether work had stopped altogether, and we began weekly photographic updates within a month; those later became the basis for signed stage records. I also wrote the first possession checklist and saw how much a paper inspection lost between the flat and the contractor's crew. I approved the resident marketplace in 2021, a decision I later reversed and describe on the impact page.
Reason for the move
Appointed the company's first chief product officer when product and possession were combined under one remit.
- Sector
- Housing finance for salaried and self-employed home buyers
- Ownership
- Unlisted housing finance company owned by its promoter family and two institutional investors
- Company scale
- Loan book of about ₹6,200 crore at period end
- Employees
- About 1,900 across 64 branches at period end
- Geography
- Chennai headquarters; Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Telangana and Andhra Pradesh
- Reporting to
- Chief operating officer
- Team
- Nine product and process colleagues, working with branch credit and technical valuation teams
- Financial scope
- Disbursement journey for under-construction loans, about ₹1,400 crore disbursed a year by period end
Mandate
Shorten the time between a developer's stage demand and the lender's tranche release without weakening technical or credit checks.
Outcomes
- Built a stage-document checklist shared with 140 approved projects
- Reduced median tranche turnaround from 19 working days to 9
- Reported digital-journey complaints and process failures to the board's risk management committee twice a year
Decisions in context
A lender sees an under-construction home as a series of tranches, each released against evidence. I managed the product and process for those loans, working with branch credit officers and the technical valuers who visited sites. The commonest delay was not credit risk but a missing or inconsistent stage document from the developer. I built a checklist, shared with 140 approved projects, stating exactly what each tranche required, and median turnaround fell from 19 working days to 9. Twice a year I reported complaints and process failures to the board's risk management committee, my first experience of preparing material for directors and answering their questions. The role also showed me buyers charged interest by a developer for a delay neither they nor the bank had caused. I left to work on that problem from the developer's side.
Reason for the move
Moved to a developer to work on the buyer's journey before and after the loan.
- Sector
- Online residential listings for rent and resale
- Ownership
- Venture-funded private start-up
- Company scale
- About ₹14 crore annual revenue at period end
- Employees
- About 140 at period end
- Geography
- Bengaluru headquarters; listings in six southern cities
- Reporting to
- Co-founder and head of product
- Team
- Four engineers and a designer; no line reports until 2012
- Financial scope
- Listing quality and search features; no budget authority
Mandate
Improve the reliability of the listings that buyers and tenants used to shortlist homes.
Outcomes
- Introduced a verified-visit badge for listings inspected by field staff
- Removed a ready-to-move filter that brokers were applying to unfinished buildings
- Built the first measure of enquiries that led to a site visit
Decisions in context
I left construction for a listings start-up because I wanted to work on what people read when choosing a home. The product was straightforward: rental and resale listings across six southern cities, sold to brokers and owners by subscription. Reliability was the difficulty. Brokers posted the same flat several times and described unfinished buildings as ready to occupy. I introduced a verified-visit badge for listings our field staff had inspected, and removed the ready-to-move filter once we found it attached to buildings without occupancy certificates. Enquiries dipped for a quarter before site visits per enquiry improved. I completed a part-time MBA while working there, mostly in evenings and at weekends. When the company was acquired in 2013, its product team moved to the acquirer's offices in the north, and I decided to stay in the south.
Reason for the move
The start-up was acquired in 2013 and its product team relocated to the acquirer's northern offices; I chose to stay in the south.
- Sector
- Building construction for residential and commercial developers
- Ownership
- Privately held, founder-managed contractor
- Company scale
- About ₹380 crore annual revenue at period end
- Employees
- About 900 staff plus a subcontracted workforce
- Geography
- Chennai and its suburbs
- Reporting to
- Projects director
- Team
- Planning cell of five from 2007
- Financial scope
- Schedules and monthly progress reports for six to nine concurrent projects
Mandate
Prepare and maintain construction schedules and progress reports for developer clients.
Outcomes
- Separated achieved stages from forecast stages in monthly client reports
- Built resource histograms that exposed shuttering shortages before slab cycles slipped
- Prepared delay analyses that clients used in their own buyer communication
Decisions in context
Planning taught me the difference between a date a schedule could support and a date somebody wanted. I prepared construction schedules and monthly progress reports for six to nine developer projects at a time, and from 2007 I led a planning cell of five. Some clients' sales teams quoted possession dates from the best case in our schedules, so I began separating achieved stages from forecast stages in every report, making the two harder to confuse once they reached a brochure. Resource histograms helped us see shuttering and labour shortages before slab cycles slipped. At weekends, buyers sometimes walked onto our sites and asked the site staff when they would get their keys. We were not permitted to answer, and I understood why, but the question stayed with me and eventually took me out of construction.
Reason for the move
Wanted to shape what buyers were told, rather than the schedules behind it.
Site engineer
Oonjalur Civil Works
Jul 2001 — Jun 2004
- Sector
- Building contracting for apartments, schools and small commercial buildings
- Ownership
- Family-owned partnership
- Company scale
- About ₹45 crore annual revenue at period end
- Employees
- About 160 staff plus labour contractors
- Geography
- Coimbatore and Tiruppur
- Reporting to
- Senior project engineer
- Team
- Supervised two foremen on one site; no staff reports
- Financial scope
- Measurement records supporting subcontractor bills on assigned blocks
Mandate
Check work against drawings before each pour and keep measurement and inspection records.
Outcomes
- Kept pour cards and reinforcement checks for two apartment blocks of 96 homes
- Recorded the measurements behind subcontractor bills
- Prepared the snag list for a school building before its handover
Decisions in context
My first job was on two apartment blocks of 96 homes in Coimbatore, followed by a school building in Tiruppur. Before each pour I checked the reinforcement against the drawings with the foreman, recorded the inspection on a pour card and passed it to the senior project engineer to countersign. I also kept the measurement records that supported subcontractor bills. The pour card taught me that a record is only as useful as the inspection behind it, and that it should say what was checked and what was not. At the school, I prepared the snag list before handover and noticed how many items were closed on the contractor's word rather than by anyone looking again. These were small responsibilities, but they shaped how I later designed stage records and snag closure. I moved to Chennai to learn planning across several projects.
Reason for the move
Joined a larger Chennai contractor to learn planning across several projects.
What I am looking for next
I intend to remain chief product officer at Mukilvanam Homes and to add one independent directorship. The seat I want is on the board of a consumer business whose customers pay in stages for something delivered later: a school group collecting term fees, a hospital network selling planned-treatment packages, or a services company with long contracts. In each, customer trust depends on evidence people can check between payment and delivery, and the board benefits from a director who reads complaint and service data as carefully as the accounts. I would not seek a seat in residential development or housing finance, where my employer's relationships would make independence hard to sustain. My managing director has agreed in principle to twenty-two days a year, subject to a review of each specific opportunity. I have not yet served as a director, and I would look for an experienced chair and a proper induction before accepting committee responsibilities.