Learning which commitments the first comparison had omitted

I began commercial analysis with a preference for a clean comparison. Two alternatives were easier to discuss when they could be placed in adjacent columns. Over time I learned that the most consequential difference often sat outside the first table:work one option required, specialist capacity another assumed, or a responsibility that remained after ownership changed. Strategy became more useful to me when it made those differences discussable rather than removing them to produce a simpler recommendation.

After completing commerce studies in May 1992, I joined Darqavni Commercial Studies as an analyst. I worked in a four-person group preparing client comparisons under a senior manager’s review. I had no independent investment or spending authority. The assignment required careful handling of the basis behind a number. A sales estimate, a cost allocation and a future cash commitment could all appear in the same workbook without answering the same question. I learned to identify what a figure described before using it to argue for an alternative.

I became a project supervisor in 1999, leading six colleagues within ₹74 lakh annual delivery expense. Clients retained their decisions and their finance specialists reviewed the commercial assumptions. My responsibility was to make the comparison inspectable and to preserve disagreement that mattered to the recommendation. I found that an objection could disappear when the final presentation was shortened, even though nobody had resolved it. I began asking the person responsible for the disputed assumption to explain its consequence directly. That habit later helped me revisit my own proposal without treating a challenge as a personal contest.

Velqerni appointed me planning manager in 2006. Eight colleagues worked within ₹1.2 crore annual function expense. Joining the retailer let me follow the commitments after an investment paper had been approved. An instrument sale could require specialist demonstration, delivery, setup or continuing service whose workload varied by category. Store colleagues knew those differences in practical terms. I wanted the planning account to reflect their knowledge without turning every operational detail into a reason to avoid growth. The task was to distinguish a material dependency from a preference for keeping the business familiar.

In 2013 I became head of category development, leading twelve colleagues through two managers within ₹2.6 crore annual function expense. I coordinated category recommendations but did not own the retailer’s full trading P&L. The piano-room proposal emerged during this appointment. I had supported a broader expansion on a sales and gross-margin account that did not sufficiently examine the accompanying delivery and tuning commitment. CFO colleagues helped clarify the comparison, and operating specialists explained the resource consequences. I revised the recommendation to a more limited trial. The correction did not prove that pianos were a poor category; it showed that the original basis was insufficient for the scale I had proposed.

I became CSO in 2021. The present strategy team has nine colleagues through two leads within ₹2.1 crore annual expense. That is a narrower team than the previous category-development remit, with different responsibilities rather than an unexplained reduction in seniority. I report to CEO Nisha Verqlani and work alongside CFO Rajan Delqeshi. The business has 238 employees and ₹5.3 crore operating profit for FY 2025–26. Founders, regional investors and employees hold the equity; I have no personal interest. My invited presentations to directors concern enterprise choices, not service as a statutory director.

Consignment and rental proposals have required me to think beyond the transaction the customer sees. A consigned instrument can remain someone else’s property while the retailer carries inspection, custody and settlement obligations. A rental fleet can be ready for use while a substantial portion remains idle. Those facts do not make the models unattractive by definition. They change the question the enterprise needs to answer and the evidence needed before extending the commitment. I want managers to be able to report that a trial remains incomplete without being accused of failing the strategic ambition.

My next executive interest is a consumer strategy role that respects both opportunity and the work it creates. For an outside contribution, I would need further governance preparation and a realistic calendar. I would bring questions about commercial assumptions while learning from directors with other experience. I would not turn the receiving company’s strategy discussion into an opportunity to prescribe Velqerni’s formats or become another route for directing its specialists.

Open to Board appointments · Executive opportunities

Languages / English · Hindi · Nepali