Diana Vellerton

Diana Vellerton · Chief Information Officer · United States

My route through depot applications, integration and enterprise information

Jan 2019 — Present

Chief information officer

Merovant Freight Systems

Sector
Freight management, depot services and contract warehousing
Ownership
Founders 40%; private-equity investor 60% since 2013
Company scale
USD2.26 billion in calendar 2025
Employees
9,400 company employees in 2025
Geography
Chicago headquarters; eighty-six depots and thirty contract warehouses in the United States and Canada
Reporting to
Chief executive officer
Team
216 employees through six direct reports; fifty-eight contractors separately
Financial scope
2026 USD84 million authority: USD52 million operations and USD32 million change

Mandate

Make enterprise shipment information intelligible and dependable for the people responsible for freight and customer commitments.

Outcomes

  • Resolved 420 of 480 uncertain sequences in a 2,400-history examination, leaving sixty explicitly unresolved
  • Separated syntax acceptance from business confirmation in a 1,200-tender cohort
  • Corrected a first-piece completion rule to expose eighty partial consignments among five hundred reviewed
  • Kept retrospective ETA improvement separate from the unchanged 540 of 900 deliveries inside their promised window

Decisions in context

The CIO appointment made me responsible for the enterprise account of technology investment as well as the services themselves. I report to Nolan Grevett and lead 216 employees through six direct reports, with contractor capacity stated separately. The 2026 authority distinguishes USD52 million operating services from USD32 million change. I have concentrated on the meaning of the evidence moving through our systems: which clock a timestamp describes, what a tender acknowledgement establishes and when a consignment can truthfully be called complete. Lucinda Merroway and the operating organisation retain authority over physical dispatch and service interventions. My work helps them see and explain the position without confusing application success with freight performance. I present these choices to the board as an executive and have no director appointment. The current role has strengthened my habit of carrying the unresolved group and the next decision into an investment account, even when a simpler success statement would be easier to present.

Reason for the move

Current appointment; considering a carefully scoped first board contribution alongside the executive remit.

Jan 2015 — Dec 2018

Director of enterprise platforms

Merovant Freight Systems

Sector
Freight and warehouse enterprise applications
Ownership
Founders 40%; private-equity investor 60%
Company scale
USD1.78 billion in calendar 2018
Employees
7,300 company staff in the final year
Geography
Sixty-four depots across United States and Canadian operations by 2018
Reporting to
Chief operating officer
Team
126 employees; five direct reports by December 2018
Financial scope
USD46 million annual authority in calendar 2018

Mandate

Connect transport applications, warehouse systems and enterprise services without losing the operating meaning of their records.

Outcomes

  • Established accountable owners for the business meaning of shared shipment fields
  • Separated application availability from the service conclusions made from its records
  • Introduced operating review of proposed enterprise status definitions

Decisions in context

Leading enterprise platforms broadened my responsibility beyond interfaces into the services on which several operating functions depended. I reported to the chief operating officer and led a team that reached 126 employees through five direct reports. My final-year authority was USD46 million; the employer's revenue and depot count describe the company at that date rather than resources personally controlled by me. I worked with transport and warehouse colleagues on definitions that had to remain useful when local records entered a common view. The difficult discussion was often about responsibility: who could decide what a status meant and what evidence should be required before it changed. I learnt to bring that question into the proposal before a platform team had already committed to a convenient implementation. The CIO opportunity followed because the enterprise needed the same connection between operating meaning, continuing service and investment decisions across its wider technology estate.

Reason for the move

Appointed CIO to lead the full enterprise technology portfolio and its investment account.

Jan 2009 — Dec 2014

Head of integration

Merovant Freight Systems

Sector
Transport and warehouse systems integration
Ownership
Founder-owned on entry; founders 40% and private-equity investor 60% from 2013
Company scale
USD1.14 billion in calendar 2014
Employees
5,100 company employees by the final year
Geography
Forty-six depots across the United States and Canada in 2014
Reporting to
Technology director
Team
Sixty-four employees; four direct reports at the end of the appointment
Financial scope
USD18 million annual authority in 2014

Mandate

Make exchanges between applications and partners useful to the operating teams who relied on them.

Outcomes

  • Documented the distinction between successful message handling and the business state a recipient could confirm
  • Brought partner and depot owners into exception design
  • Established a route for investigating messages whose meaning could not be inferred from transport success

Decisions in context

Integration taught me to resist the word accepted when its meaning had not been specified. A technical exchange could succeed while the operating question remained open, and the next team could reasonably misunderstand a green status. I reported to the technology director and led sixty-four employees through four direct reports by the end of the role. The private-equity investment occurred in 2013, during this appointment; it was not the ownership context in which I began it. My final-year authority was USD18 million. I worked with depot and partner owners to make exceptions interpretable rather than simply visible in an integration queue. That required learning their language and accepting that technology could not settle every business question from a message alone. The move to enterprise platforms extended the remit to the applications producing and consuming those exchanges, where some of the underlying assumptions needed to be addressed.

Reason for the move

Promoted into enterprise platforms with responsibility for the applications and services beyond integration.

Jan 2002 — Dec 2008

Transport applications manager

Merovant Freight Systems

Sector
Freight management and depot application services
Ownership
Founder-owned private business
Company scale
USD640 million in calendar 2008
Employees
3,000 company employees in the final year
Geography
Twenty-eight depots serving United States and Canadian operations by 2008
Reporting to
Head of technology
Team
Twenty-eight employees; three direct reports by the final year
Financial scope
USD5.2 million annual authority in 2008

Mandate

Support transport application changes with a practical account of their meaning and continuing service needs.

Outcomes

  • Connected application requests to the depot decision they were intended to support
  • Made training and exception handling part of the service introduction
  • Developed team responsibilities for investigating contradictory shipment accounts

Decisions in context

I joined Merovant to take responsibility for people and ongoing application service, rather than analysis alone. The team grew to twenty-eight employees through three direct reports during the appointment, and my authority reached USD5.2 million in its final year. I reported to the head of technology and spent time with depot colleagues who needed the system to explain work in progress, not just store a transaction. Managing the service changed how I evaluated a proposed improvement. A new field or screen needed training, an owner for exceptions and a way to reconcile the account when two teams described the same movement differently. The employer figures belong to 2008 and do not imply that the business had that scale when I arrived. The integration appointment offered a broader opportunity to address the exchanges through which many of those differences became visible between applications and partners.

Reason for the move

Promoted to integration leadership as partner exchanges became a larger enterprise responsibility.

Jun 1993 — Dec 2001

Applications analyst

Belvarin Freight

Sector
Domestic freight operations and supporting applications
Ownership
Privately owned freight company
Company scale
USD180 million in calendar 2001
Employees
1,200 company staff in the final year
Geography
United States freight operations
Reporting to
Applications manager
Team
Member of an eight-person applications team; no direct reports
Financial scope
No personal budget or expenditure approval authority

Mandate

Analyse application requests while learning how depot events became a shipment explanation.

Outcomes

  • Documented the operating questions behind requested status changes
  • Learnt to distinguish the time of a movement from the time its record became available
  • Traced application questions to colleagues with direct knowledge of the depot process

Decisions in context

I began at Belvarin in June 1993 after completing my computing degree at Aldervane College in May. I was one member of an eight-person applications team, reporting to the applications manager with no direct reports or authority to approve spending. A depot colleague's explanation of a delayed record changed the way I read a timestamp: the message could arrive after the movement it described. I learnt to ask what an event meant to the next person before recommending a cleaner display. The work depended on operating knowledge I did not yet possess, so listening was a practical requirement rather than a leadership slogan. In the final year, the company employed 1,200 people and reported USD180 million revenue. Those figures describe the employer, not an analyst's remit. The Merovant move appealed because it would make me accountable for the people and continuing services behind the recommendations I had learnt to develop.

Reason for the move

Accepted transport applications management at Merovant, adding people and service responsibility.

What I am looking for next

I would be interested in a board where the quality of an enterprise's operating account matters to investment and customer trust. Freight and other distributed services create useful questions about the relationship between a digital event and the commitment it is used to explain. My experience could support technology or relevant risk discussions alongside directors with financial, commercial and operating expertise. I have not yet served as a director and would need preparation for the collective duties of the proposed seat. Twenty-four external days are an initial planning position, subject to the actual calendar, employer consent and a review of relationships. I would want to understand exceptional demands as well as scheduled meetings before making a commitment. My contribution should help management explain evidence and uncertainty more clearly, without turning a board appointment into another route for running the technology team. The next chapter needs a specific enterprise question and an honest assessment of the time and learning required to contribute well.