- Sector
- Bench-mounted dental teaching simulators and practice rigs
- Ownership
- Founder engineers 60%, employee owners 40%; personal 4% is included within the employee holding
- Company scale
- ₹58 crore revenue and ₹6.1 crore operating profit, FY ending March 2026
- Employees
- 185 company employees
- Geography
- Mangaluru engineering and manufacturing base; 28 college customers
- Reporting to
- Chief Executive Officer Saira Qavthuri
- Team
- 38 engineers through four heads
- Financial scope
- ₹10.2 crore annual engineering expense; separate ₹3.4 crore approved capital
Mandate
Connect mechanical, sensing and controller evidence with the conditions of educational use
Outcomes
- Funded adjustable-mount work after a handedness-specific limitation
- Kept force-reference checks and shared-room response results within their tested scope
- Maintained a broader cassette-release pause after unresolved installations
Decisions in context
I became CTO in February 2022. Tevzuni now employs 185 people and serves 28 college customers, with ₹58 crore revenue and ₹6.1 crore operating profit for FY ending March 2026. I lead 38 engineers through four heads, reporting to Saira, with ₹10.2 crore annual expense and a separate ₹3.4 crore approved capital allocation. Meghna advises on education, while teaching and assessment remain with educators. My remit connects mechanical design, sensing and controller behaviour with the conditions in which the equipment is used. The cases include a positioning limitation, reference-point checks, shared-room response and unresolved cassette installations. I hold 4% of total company equity within the employee owners' 40%, but no statutory seat. The leadership responsibility is to make the engineering claim precise enough for others to judge, including when a release remains paused.
Reason for the move
Current engineering leadership role; no statutory directorship
- Sector
- Dental teaching-equipment engineering
- Ownership
- Privately held engineering company
- Company scale
- ₹41 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2018
- Employees
- 140 company employees
- Geography
- Mangaluru product-development and assembly operations
- Reporting to
- Chief Executive Officer
- Team
- 29 engineers through three heads
- Financial scope
- ₹7.8 crore annual engineering expense
Mandate
Coordinate design evaluation and product-engineering commitments
Outcomes
- Expanded responsibility beyond mechanical design into the engineering organisation
- Owned the premature 2018 mount approval and subsequent hold
- Funded redesign while keeping the repeated-load question explicit
Decisions in context
The April 2017 appointment expanded my remit to 29 engineers through three heads and ₹7.8 crore annual expense under the CEO. Tevzuni had 140 employees and ₹41 crore revenue for FY 2018. In 2018 I approved a mount geometry on the strength of an initial static check. A later repeated-load review found twelve of forty rigs tilting, so we held 240 preproduction units before shipment. The redesign cost ₹62 lakh and added seven weeks to the programme. I learned to make the conditions of an approval explicit before a successful demonstration acquired a wider meaning. The role required me to explain the change to engineering and commercial colleagues, including my own responsibility, rather than treat the later hold as a separate team's caution unrelated to the decision I had made.
Reason for the move
Appointed CTO in February 2022
- Sector
- Mechanical design of dental-education simulators
- Ownership
- Privately held specialist equipment business
- Company scale
- ₹24 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2013
- Employees
- Ninety company employees
- Geography
- Mangaluru design workshop and production base
- Reporting to
- Chief Executive Officer
- Team
- Eighteen engineers through three leads
- Financial scope
- ₹4.6 crore annual mechanical-design expense
Mandate
Develop teaching mechanisms with a clear account of their engineering behaviour
Outcomes
- Moved from general workshop products into dental teaching equipment
- Built collaboration with education advisers and equipment users
- Learned to distinguish mechanical evaluation from teaching or clinical assessment
Decisions in context
I joined Tevzuni in September 2012 and moved into a specialised educational-equipment environment. The company employed ninety people and recorded ₹24 crore revenue for FY 2013. I led eighteen engineers through three leads with ₹4.6 crore annual expense, reporting to the CEO. A mechanism could function as designed while still creating a difficulty in the way an educator wanted to organise a session. I learned to discuss those conditions with users without treating my mechanical expertise as authority over their teaching. The work required a clear account of what the equipment had been tested to do and what remained a different kind of judgement. That experience broadened my understanding of product responsibility and prepared me to lead engineering across more than the shape and movement of individual components.
Reason for the move
Promoted to head of engineering in April 2017
- Sector
- Workshop instruments and practical training equipment
- Ownership
- Founder-owned private manufacturer
- Company scale
- ₹27 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2008
- Employees
- 110 company employees
- Geography
- Southern India engineering and manufacturing operations
- Reporting to
- Technical Head
- Team
- Twelve engineers through two leads
- Financial scope
- ₹2.8 crore annual product-engineering expense
Mandate
Connect component design with the product's intended installation, handling and repeated use
Outcomes
- Took responsibility for engineering colleagues and function expense
- Worked with installation and service teams on use conditions
- Developed evaluation judgement beyond the initial drawing review
Decisions in context
I became product engineer in May 2007, leading twelve engineers through two leads with ₹2.8 crore annual expense under the technical head. Tazqeli employed 110 people and recorded ₹27 crore revenue for FY 2008. The wider role required me to consider a product after the first assembly: how it would be adjusted, handled, maintained and used repeatedly. I worked with installation and service colleagues whose practical difficulties could expose an assumption left untouched in a drawing review. A mechanism's plausible geometry was a starting point rather than the complete evidence for its intended use. I learned to explain those questions to a senior technical leader and to organise the work of others around them. The move into dental teaching equipment later built on that product-level perspective.
Reason for the move
Joined a specialist simulator business in September 2012
- Sector
- Mechanical workshop instruments
- Ownership
- Founder-owned private manufacturer
- Company scale
- ₹8.6 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2003
- Employees
- 45 company employees
- Geography
- Southern India design and assembly workshop
- Reporting to
- Design Manager
- Team
- Engineer in a six-person design group; no direct reports
- Financial scope
- No delegated spending authority
Mandate
Develop component drawings and understand their physical assembly and use
Outcomes
- Applied mechanical-engineering study to practical product work
- Learned from assembly and adjustment rather than drawings alone
- Built a foundation for later product and people responsibility
Decisions in context
I joined in July 2002 after completing my engineering degree in June. Tazqeli employed 45 people and recorded ₹8.6 crore revenue for FY ending March 2003. I worked in a six-person design group under the design manager, without direct reports or delegated spending authority. The practical work taught me to connect a drawing with the sequence through which a component would be assembled, adjusted and used. A dimension could be correct while leaving a difficult handling step for the person working with the mechanism. I learned from colleagues in the workshop and from the changes needed after an initial assembly. At that stage I contributed design work rather than setting enterprise policy or approving major programmes. The later product role grew from that attention to the physical use behind the drawing.
Reason for the move
Promoted to product engineer in May 2007
What I am looking for next
I would explore one first outside board contribution in specialised equipment or educational technology where evidence about use conditions is material to product and investment decisions. My experience could help directors examine which population, configuration and workload support a claim, without turning the board into a design-approval meeting. I would need to learn the receiving company's entire business model, commercial obligations and sector responsibilities. I have no statutory directorship. The fictional record includes June 2026 IICA registration with the assessment unfinished and no exemption. My 4% shareholding, executive role and customer or supplier relationships would require qualified appointment review and employer consent. Twenty-one days is provisional and includes induction, preparation, travel and unusual demands. I would seek an experienced chair and complementary expertise that helps me develop collective oversight judgement. A suitable contribution would have practical conditions I can meet, rather than rely on my technical background to imply independence, eligibility or readiness for every committee responsibility.