Sofia FerraroChief Technology Officer · Essays & perspective

Supplier replacement and network energy5 min read

Network changes with a measurable operating benefit

When a supplier must be removed, the instinct is to replace its equipment like for like and move on. I argue that an operator should treat the programme as the one visit it will make to every affected site this decade, and change power, bands and legacy layers on that visit.

My position is easy to state and harder to carry out. When an operator has to remove a supplier's equipment from thousands of radio sites, it should not replace like for like. It should treat the programme as the one occasion in a decade when crews, cranes, permits and budget will reach every one of those sites, and use each visit to change the site's power system, its band plan and its legacy layers at the same time. That makes the programme harder to manage. It also turns a cost the operator did not choose into the largest energy and resilience improvement it is likely to make.

Continue the essay

The enduring idea

I trust a network only as far as it has been tested in the conditions it will fail in: a heatwave, a power cut, a supplier that stops answering, a configuration that drifted while nobody looked. Most of my work is arranging for those tests to happen on our terms rather than on the network's, and then telling the board plainly what they showed.

A philosophy in practice ↗

The journal

Further reading.

  1. 02

    Open RAN and supplier choice5 min read

    Open RAN belongs where we can name who fixes the fault

    Our 240-site pilot showed that open interfaces lowered prices and widened choice, but made faults far slower to assign. I argue that a challenger should keep Open RAN as a small, permanent second source in defined layers, with one accountable owner for every fault, rather than plan a network-wide migration.

  2. 03

    Copper switch-off and power resilience5 min read

    When the copper goes, the power cut becomes the operator's problem

    An exchange-powered copper line kept working in a blackout; fibre and fixed-wireless lines do not. I argue that operators moving customers off copper should state how long each service lasts without mains power, equip the customers who depend on it, and size site batteries by what each site serves.

Radio sites
9,800
Corvalta Mobile network at the end of 2025, including 1,300 hosting a sharing partner
Network capital expenditure
€305m
Corvalta Mobile, 2025
Electricity per gigabyte
−53%
Network-wide, 2022 to 2025

Every time we touch a site, a core or a customer's line, I want it to come back cheaper to power, easier to prove and harder to break than we found it.

I am chief technology officer of Corvalta Mobile, a challenger mobile operator in Italy with 7.3 million mobile lines, 540,000 fixed broadband customers and €1.46 billion of revenue in 2025. I am responsible for a radio network of 9,800 sites, the core, our fixed-wireless and wholesale fibre platforms, network IT and network security. I lead 1,120 colleagues and hold €305 million of annual capital expenditure and €372 million of operating costs, a fifth of which is electricity. I report to our chief executive, Lorenzo Baldracchi, and present to the board and its audit and risk committee.

I have worked on every side of a radio site. I began in 1999 as a planning engineer at Nerantel in Rome, then spent nine years at Halvorsk Networks, an equipment maker, integrating 3G in Italy and running a Greek operator's network under contract through the financial crisis. I led the radio network at Aldera Comunicações in Lisbon, where I negotiated a sharing agreement with a rival, and from 2017 ran engineering at Torrevia Towers, which taught me what keeping a site powered really costs. I joined Corvalta in January 2021.

Four questions have occupied me since. How do we remove a supplier we had decided to remove without simply buying the same network again? How do we halve the energy each gigabyte needs while traffic keeps rising? How do we know, rather than hope, that our second core site will take over? And when the copper line that once kept a telephone working in a blackout is switched off, who keeps that customer connected now? My answers have cost Corvalta customers, a launch date and some margin; those costs sit beside the results here.

A supplier replaced, and the sites redesigned

Between January 2023 and November 2025 we replaced a high-risk supplier's radios on 4,100 sites, removing 3G and renewing batteries on the same visit. Those sites now draw 27% less electricity for the same traffic, about 38 gigawatt hours a year.

Energy per gigabyte more than halved

Network electricity fell from 448 gigawatt hours in 2022 to 362 in 2025 while data traffic rose 71%, so each gigabyte needed 53% less energy. The early 3G switch-off cost us about 21,000 lines.

Failover proved rather than assumed

After a voice outage of six hours and forty minutes in July 2024, we have switched live traffic between our two core sites eight times. One test interrupted calls for 19 minutes; the last five caused no interruption customers could see.

Copper customers moved by radio capacity

Of 168,000 customers whose copper lines were switched off, 151,000 moved with us to fibre or fixed wireless. We capped fixed-wireless homes per radio sector, giving up about €14 million a year of margin to protect mobile customers' evening speeds.

Current focus

I am moving our remaining customers onto the 5G standalone core by June 2027 and preparing the evidence for the board's decision, in the 2027 budget, on whether a third core site is needed. I am also renegotiating our rural sharing agreement with Sestriva Telecom, which renews in 2028, and growing our open-interface radio sites from 240 to about 700.

Conversations I welcome

With Corvalta's consent I would consider one non-executive seat on an infrastructure board outside telecoms, and from mid-2027 a conversation about a group CTO role in a multi-country network business. I accept a few speaking invitations a year on supplier replacement, network energy and resilience.

Beyond the page

The record behind the perspective.

In the boardroom

  • Fondazione CalvennaDirector; chair of the curriculum committee · March 2022–present

Formation

  • Laurea magistrale in telecommunications engineeringAteneo di Valmerana · 1999
  • Second-level master's degree in energy systems for infrastructure (part-time)Politecnico Albrenta · 2019
After the July 2024 failure, Sofia's first paper to the committee did not ask for a new building. It asked for permission to move live calls between our two core sites, at night, until we knew they worked, and it carried her operations director's objection in full. The committee trusted the plan because nothing in it was hidden.
Lorenzo BaldracchiChief executive, Corvalta Mobile
The full record ↗

Contact

With Corvalta's consent I would consider one non-executive seat on an infrastructure board outside telecoms, and from mid-2027 a conversation about a group CTO role in a multi-country network business. I accept a few speaking invitations a year on supplier replacement, network energy and resilience.

  • Board appointments
  • Advisory roles
  • Speaking invitations
  • Executive opportunities