- Sector
- Home power backup and rooftop solar: inverters, batteries, hybrid inverters and residential and small-factory rooftop systems
- Ownership
- Listed on NSE and BSE since 2011; Sethia promoter group holds 58 per cent
- Company scale
- ₹3,180 Cr revenue and ₹342 Cr EBITDA in FY2025-26
- Employees
- 5,600, plus about 2,600 technicians at franchised service points
- Geography
- Gurugram headquarters; plants at Haridwar and Bawal; sales in 14 states through 1,150 distributors and about 21,000 retailers
- Reporting to
- Managing Director and CEO; presents to the Board twice a year and reports to its Risk Management Committee on product safety and customer data
- Team
- 260 across product management, design and research, the app, solar system engineering and installation standards; seven direct reports
- Financial scope
- Operating budget of ₹118 Cr and product capital spending of ₹45 Cr a year; product accountability for solar revenue of ₹1,020 Cr in FY2025-26
Mandate
Turn a backup-power company into a home-energy company before backup demand declined, and turn a catalogue of solar panels into a product households could trust.
Outcomes
- Grew solar revenue from ₹110 Cr in FY2020-21 to ₹1,020 Cr in FY2025-26, with more than 1.12 lakh residential rooftop systems installed.
- Cut the inverter range from 112 models to 46 and made the hybrid inverter the default; hybrids reached 41 per cent of inverter units.
- Reduced first-year service tickets from 38 to 11 per 100 rooftop systems after moving installation standards into product.
- Cut the median wait from installation to subsidy credit from 97 days to 38 for households on the central rooftop programme.
- Launched a small-factory rooftop product that installed 1,400 systems worth ₹154 Cr in FY2025-26.
Decisions in context
I joined Dhruvanta in April 2021 at the invitation of Ambar Sethia, the managing director, who had seen the rooftop loan pilot I ran at Prayavan Consumer Finance. The company earned ₹2,240 crore that year, almost all of it from inverters and batteries, and its solar business was a catalogue of panels and charge controllers sold through retailers. My mandate was to build a home-energy business before better grid supply eroded backup demand. In five years we launched residential rooftop installation, a hybrid inverter range, a subsidy-journey product, an offer for small factories and an app now linked to about 2.3 lakh connected inverters. Not every decision went well: our early growth outran installation quality, and correcting it cost a year of plan. I lead 260 people with seven direct reports and work most closely with the chief technology officer, the head of sales and the head of our services subsidiary.
Reason for the move
Current role. Not seeking an executive move; considering one independent directorship with the Dhruvanta board's consent.
- Sector
- Non-banking finance: point-of-sale consumer durable loans and small personal loans
- Ownership
- NBFC registered with the RBI; majority-owned by a private equity fund, with the founders holding the balance
- Company scale
- ₹1,140 Cr total income and a ₹6,800 Cr loan book in FY2020-21
- Employees
- 4,100
- Geography
- Pune headquarters; lending at about 14,000 shop counters in 320 towns
- Reporting to
- Chief Business Officer; presented product changes to the Credit Committee
- Team
- 38; five direct reports
- Financial scope
- Product ownership of point-of-sale disbursements of about ₹5,200 Cr a year; no credit approval authority
Mandate
Shorten loan approval at the shop counter without loosening credit, and extend point-of-sale lending into smaller towns.
Outcomes
- Cut the median approval time at the counter from 22 minutes to six with a redesigned application and document check.
- Extended point-of-sale lending from 190 towns to 320, with thirty-day arrears held at about 2 per cent.
- Designed a rooftop-solar loan pilot that financed 1,900 small systems in 2019–20.
- Built a repayment-reminder journey in four languages that reduced first-instalment defaults by about a third.
Decisions in context
Prayavan approved small loans at shop counters for buyers of televisions, refrigerators, phones and home inverters, often in towns where the customer had no credit history. I led a product team of 38 that owned the application journey, the document checks and the repayment experience, working alongside a credit team that set the risk rules and held all approval authority. We cut the median approval time from 22 minutes to six and extended lending from 190 towns to 320 while keeping arrears close to 2 per cent. In 2019 I designed a pilot loan for small rooftop systems, which financed 1,900 systems in its first year. It showed me how a lender sees solar: a long-lived asset, a monthly instalment and an installer nobody has assessed. I left when Dhruvanta offered me a product role that included the physical product itself.
Reason for the move
Invited to lead product at a listed home-power company, with responsibility for the physical product as well as the customer journey.
- Sector
- Direct-to-home satellite television
- Ownership
- Unlisted subsidiary of a diversified media group
- Company scale
- ₹2,950 Cr revenue in FY2015-16
- Employees
- 2,800, plus about 7,500 contracted technicians
- Geography
- Noida headquarters; subscribers in 26 states, concentrated in north and east India
- Reporting to
- Chief Operating Officer
- Team
- 54; six direct reports
- Financial scope
- Prepaid plans and recharge products for about ₹2,400 Cr of subscription revenue; field-services budget of ₹160 Cr a year from 2013
Mandate
Reduce churn among prepaid households and, from 2013, improve the installation and repair network.
Outcomes
- Reduced monthly churn among prepaid households from 2.6 per cent to 1.7 per cent with balance alerts, small recharges and a grace day.
- Cut repeat technician visits within thirty days from 21 per cent to 9 per cent.
- Introduced technician certification and pay linked to thirty-day quality across 7,500 contracted technicians.
- Reduced set-top boxes returned for repair by 28 per cent through a remote diagnostic flow.
Decisions in context
Taravani served more than nine million households, most of them on prepaid plans recharged every month at a neighbourhood shop. I joined to run product for prepaid subscriptions and found that churn was driven less by price than by surprise: a channel switched off without warning, or a balance that ran out on the night of a cricket final. Balance alerts, small-value recharges and a grace day cut monthly churn from 2.6 per cent to 1.7 per cent. In 2013 I also took over installation and field services, with 7,500 contracted technicians paid per visit and repeat visits within thirty days running at 21 per cent. We introduced certification and linked part of each technician's pay to thirty-day quality, and repeat visits fell to 9 per cent. By 2016 the category had stopped growing, and I wanted to understand household finance in smaller towns.
Reason for the move
Satellite television had stopped growing; wanted to learn how households in smaller towns finance larger purchases.
- Sector
- Pumps and motors for agriculture and households
- Ownership
- Listed on BSE; family-promoted
- Company scale
- ₹1,050 Cr revenue in FY2010-11
- Employees
- 3,400
- Geography
- Coimbatore headquarters and plants; sales through about 2,800 dealers in nine states
- Reporting to
- Executive Director, Marketing
- Team
- 14; four direct reports
- Financial scope
- Product planning for agricultural pump revenue of about ₹520 Cr; a ₹3 Cr budget for the solar pump pilot
Mandate
Rebuild the agricultural pump range around field conditions and test whether solar pumps could become a product line.
Outcomes
- Redesigned the submersible and monoblock range for low, unstable feeder voltage, cutting warranty motor burn-outs by 35 per cent.
- Built a training programme that reached about 4,000 village mechanics.
- Ran a 120-farmer solar pump pilot in 2010; the pumps performed, but financing and subsidy timing did not.
- Reduced the range from 340 variants to 210.
Decisions in context
In 2007 I took charge of product management for Kodaivel's agricultural pumps, a business of about ₹520 crore sold through some 2,800 dealers and kept running by village mechanics we had never counted. I spent my first months riding with those mechanics in the Kongu belt and in Vidarbha. Our motors were rated for a voltage that farm feeders rarely delivered, and warranty burn-outs showed it. We redesigned the submersible and monoblock range for low and unsteady supply, cut warranty motor failures by 35 per cent and trimmed the range from 340 variants to 210. We trained about 4,000 mechanics, because they decided which brand a farmer bought next. In 2010 I ran a solar pump pilot with 120 farmers. The pumps worked; the financing and the long wait for subsidy did not. I left in 2011 to work on a subscription product at national scale.
Reason for the move
Wanted to work on a subscription consumer product at national scale.
- Sector
- Pumps and motors for agriculture and households
- Ownership
- Listed on BSE; family-promoted
- Company scale
- ₹640 Cr revenue in FY2005-06
- Employees
- 2,700
- Geography
- Coimbatore headquarters and plants; sales concentrated in south and west India
- Reporting to
- Head of Marketing, Domestic Products
- Team
- Three
- Financial scope
- Product planning for domestic pump revenue of about ₹180 Cr; no budget authority
Mandate
Bring customer research and failure data into the design of domestic pumps.
Outcomes
- Introduced quarterly field-failure reviews based on dealer returns into the design process.
- Launched a domestic pump with dry-run protection for towns with intermittent municipal water, which became the range's best seller within two years.
- Completed a part-time postgraduate diploma in management alongside the role.
Decisions in context
I joined Kodaivel Pumps in June 2002 as product manager for domestic pumps, then a ₹180 crore business selling to households in south and west India. Most product decisions were made from the factory's view of the pump. I began reading dealer returns as evidence and brought a quarterly field-failure review into the design process. The review showed that many burn-outs in towns with intermittent municipal water came from pumps running dry for hours, so we launched a model with dry-run protection that became the range's best seller within two years. I was promoted to senior product manager in 2004. Between 2004 and 2006 I also completed a part-time postgraduate diploma in management on weekends at the Velvizhi Institute of Management, which gave me a vocabulary for pricing and channel economics that I had been learning informally from dealers.
Reason for the move
Promoted to lead product management for the larger agricultural pump business.
- Sector
- UPS units and voltage stabilisers
- Ownership
- Privately held and founder-owned
- Company scale
- About ₹85 Cr revenue in 2001-02
- Employees
- 420
- Geography
- Coimbatore; service across western Tamil Nadu and Kerala
- Reporting to
- Regional Service Manager
- Team
- Individual contributor; supervised two trainee technicians from 2000
- Financial scope
- No budget authority; service responsibility for about 900 installed units
Mandate
Install, maintain and repair UPS units and stabilisers for small factories, offices and clinics.
Outcomes
- Handled about 1,200 service calls a year across western Tamil Nadu and Kerala.
- Wrote the field report that led to a wider input-voltage range on the company's mid-size UPS.
- Trained six trainee technicians in battery care and site wiring checks.
Decisions in context
I joined Velmuran Power Electronics in July 1998 as a graduate engineer trainee, straight from my engineering degree, and became a service engineer a year later. Velmuran made UPS units and voltage stabilisers for small factories, offices and clinics, and I handled about 1,200 service calls a year across western Tamil Nadu and Kerala, most of them alone on a motorcycle with a toolbox and a multimeter. The defining call came in 1999 at a knitting unit in Tiruppur, where a UPS I had repaired twice kept failing because the evening supply sagged whenever nearby looms started. My field report led to a wider input-voltage range on our mid-size UPS. I also trained six trainee technicians in battery care and site wiring checks. I left in 2002 because I wanted to decide how products were designed rather than only repair them after they failed.
Reason for the move
Wanted to decide how products were designed, not only repair them after they failed.
What I am looking for next
I intend to stay at Dhruvanta. The move to lithium iron phosphate batteries, the redesign of our app for smart prepaid meters and the next stage of our small-factory business all need at least two more years of my attention, and I want to finish them. If I were later to consider an executive move, it would be to a chief product or business-head role at a larger consumer-facing energy company: perhaps the customer business of a private distribution company, an electric-vehicle charging network, or an appliance group with a serious energy line. What those roles share is a product that reaches households through long distribution chains and regulated processes. I would look for a chief executive and board who want product decisions argued with field evidence, and who will accept slower growth when quality requires it.
Alongside that work I want to serve on one board as an independent director, in a business that is neither a competitor, a supplier nor a partner of Dhruvanta, and only with my own board's approval. I would expect to spend a year learning before taking any chair.