FOLIO 1Mar 2021 — Present
Chief Technology Officer
Morrowgate Freight Limited
- Sector
- Freight and logistics: interstate road and intermodal rail, port container transport, contract warehousing and regional distribution
- Ownership
- Listed on the ASX since 2004; widely held
- Company scale
- A$3.42 billion revenue and A$468 million underlying EBITDA in the year to June 2026
- Employees
- 7,900, plus about 1,450 owner-drivers and subcontractors
- Geography
- Melbourne headquarters; 43 depots, three intermodal rail terminals and 21 warehouses across the eastern states, South Australia and Western Australia
- Reporting to
- Managing Director and CEO; presents to the board twice a year and reports to the Audit and Risk Committee every quarter
- Team
- 360 technology staff and about 110 contractors; seven direct reports
- Financial scope
- Technology operating budget of A$124 million and capital spending of A$58 million in the year to June 2026; technical authority for depot charging investment
Mandate
Replace three transport platforms with one, give the board a complete view of operational technology and cyber risk, and make the fleet energy transition technically deliverable.
Outcomes
- Moved all three divisions onto one transport platform by May 2025; customer connections fell from 410 to 236 and invoice disputes from 4.1 to 1.5 per cent of invoices.
- Put 24 battery-electric prime movers into service on an existing 1.5 MVA supply, with peak site demand held at 1.38 MVA.
- Renewed the largest contract-logistics contract on a delivery-event feed; dock waiting fell from 74 to 41 minutes.
- Replaced 27 standing vendor connections into terminal equipment with brokered, recorded sessions.
- Moved 1,100 interstate drivers to an approved electronic work diary in 2023.
Decisions in context
I joined Morrowgate in March 2021 as its first chief technology officer, combining roles that had previously sat with an IT director, a terminals engineering manager and the fleet department. The group had grown through acquisitions and ran three transport platforms, telematics from four suppliers and equipment networks that nobody had mapped as a whole. My mandate from the managing director was to replace the platforms without losing customers, to show the board what was connected to what, and to make sure the fleet energy programme could be delivered on the connections our depots actually had. I lead 360 staff with seven direct reports, among them our chief information security officer, and I report every quarter to the Audit and Risk Committee on cyber and technology risk. The year to June 2026 brought revenue of A$3.42 billion, and every division now runs on the same transport platform.
Reason for the move
Current role. Not seeking an executive move; considering one non-executive directorship with the Morrowgate board's consent.
FOLIO 2Feb 2017 — Feb 2021
Chief Information Officer
Pelloran Fleet Services
- Sector
- Fleet leasing, fleet management and telematics for corporate and government customers
- Ownership
- Owned by a private-equity fund from 2015 until a trade sale in 2022
- Company scale
- A$610 million revenue in the year to June 2020
- Employees
- 640
- Geography
- Sydney headquarters; offices in Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth and Auckland; about 48,000 vehicles under management
- Reporting to
- Chief Executive Officer; presented to the board of directors on technology and data
- Team
- 85; five direct reports
- Financial scope
- Technology operating budget of A$26 million and capital of about A$9 million a year
Mandate
Rebuild the telematics platform on which the company's fleet-management service depended, and modernise systems before the owners' planned exit.
Outcomes
- Consolidated telematics from three device suppliers onto one data platform covering 31,000 vehicles.
- Launched a depot assessment service in 2019 that completed 140 site assessments and supported 2,100 electric vehicles into customer fleets.
- Moved the company out of its own data centre into hosted services in 2020, cutting infrastructure cost by 23 per cent.
- Built the customer portal through which fleet managers approved leases and reviewed vehicle use.
Decisions in context
Pelloran leased and managed vehicles for companies and government agencies, and its customers increasingly bought it for its data rather than its finance. When I arrived, telematics came from three device suppliers on three platforms, and customers received reports that disagreed with each other. I consolidated the data onto one platform covering 31,000 vehicles and rebuilt the portal fleet managers used. From 2019 I led a service that assessed customers' depots before they ordered electric vehicles. We completed 140 assessments, and in about a third of them the first finding was that the switchboard or the network connection would not support the fleet the customer had planned. That work taught me the electricity network's processes and vocabulary. I also moved the company out of its own data centre in 2020, ahead of a sale process. I left because I wanted to run technology for an operator that carried the operational consequences of its own systems.
Reason for the move
Wanted to lead technology for an operator of heavy vehicles and terminals, where the consequences of a system decision would sit with my own organisation.
FOLIO 3Aug 2011 — Jan 2017
General Manager, Terminal Technology
Tallowmere Container Terminals
- Sector
- Container terminal operation (stevedoring)
- Ownership
- Privately owned by an infrastructure fund and an overseas terminal investor
- Company scale
- A$290 million revenue in the year to June 2016
- Employees
- 610
- Geography
- One container terminal at the port of Brisbane, handling about 820,000 TEU a year
- Reporting to
- Chief Operating Officer
- Team
- 34; four direct reports
- Financial scope
- Technology capital programme of A$48 million over five years and an operating budget of A$9 million a year
Mandate
Replace the terminal operating system and modernise the truck gate without interrupting vessel or landside operations.
Outcomes
- Replaced the terminal operating system in 2014 within a planned nine-hour outage.
- Introduced optical character recognition at the truck gate, with clerks retained for exceptions; truck turnaround fell from 48 to 31 minutes.
- Integrated the terminal with the vehicle booking system used by road carriers to reserve slots.
- Separated crane and gate equipment networks from the corporate network in 2015.
Decisions in context
Tallowmere ran a single container terminal in Brisbane, and its systems decided whether a ship left on time and whether a truck queued for twenty minutes or two hours. I led a team of 34 responsible for the terminal operating system, the gate, the equipment networks and the links to shipping lines, customs systems and road carriers. The operating system replacement in 2014 was the most carefully rehearsed nine hours of my career: we ran four full dress rehearsals on a copy of the yard. The gate project was humbler. The cameras read container numbers correctly 97.6 per cent of the time, so we kept clerks on every lane for the exceptions, and turnaround still fell from 48 to 31 minutes. I completed a part-time graduate certificate in cyber security in 2015, the year we separated crane and gate networks from the corporate network. I left in early 2017 for a CIO role covering a whole business.
Reason for the move
Recruited to lead the whole technology function of a fleet business, a broader remit than a single terminal could offer.
FOLIO 4May 2004 — Jul 2011
Systems Engineer, later Manager, Train Systems and Telemetry
Corellan Rail Freight
- Sector
- Interstate rail freight (above-rail operator)
- Ownership
- Owned by an Australian infrastructure fund
- Company scale
- A$520 million revenue in the year to June 2011
- Employees
- 1,100
- Geography
- Melbourne, Adelaide, Sydney and Brisbane, running over track managed by others; 74 locomotives
- Reporting to
- General Manager, Rolling Stock
- Team
- 14 by 2011; three direct reports
- Financial scope
- Train systems capital budget of about A$11 million a year; no profit-and-loss responsibility
Mandate
Make locomotive and train data usable for maintenance and fuel planning, and manage the onboard interfaces to track managers' control systems.
Outcomes
- Built remote condition monitoring for 74 locomotives, reducing in-service failures by 22 per cent over three years.
- Introduced fuel-use reporting by train and crew, contributing to a 6 per cent fall in fuel per net tonne-kilometre.
- Managed the onboard equipment and procedures for train authority systems on two track managers' networks.
Decisions in context
I joined Corellan in May 2004 as a systems engineer and became manager of train systems and telemetry in 2008. Corellan ran interstate freight trains over track owned and controlled by others, so much of what happened to its trains was visible only through other organisations' systems. My first project gave us our own view: onboard recorders and remote condition monitoring for 74 locomotives, so that maintenance planners could see a failing traction motor before it stopped a train in the desert. In-service failures fell by 22 per cent over three years. I then added fuel-use reporting by train and crew. The hardest part of the role was the interface with track managers' train authority systems, where a disagreement about what a message meant could hold a train for hours. I left in 2011 to lead technology at a container terminal, closer to the commercial customer.
Reason for the move
Wanted to lead a technology function where the operating systems and the commercial systems met, which a container terminal offered.
FOLIO 5Feb 1997 — Apr 2004
Graduate Engineer, later Signalling Design and Test Engineer
Easterbrook Rail Infrastructure Authority
- Sector
- Railway track and signalling management
- Ownership
- Owned by the Victorian state government
- Company scale
- Annual operating and capital budget of about A$410 million by 2003
- Employees
- 2,300
- Geography
- Victoria's regional rail network, from a Melbourne head office
- Reporting to
- Principal Signalling Engineer
- Team
- Led a field test crew of six from 2001
- Financial scope
- Design and test responsibility for interlocking projects worth up to A$18 million each; no budget authority
Mandate
Design, test and commission signalling interlockings on regional lines.
Outcomes
- Designed or tested nine interlockings brought into service between 1998 and 2004.
- Introduced a field-test checklist for track circuits after a wiring error found during a 1999 commissioning.
- Trained twelve graduate engineers in test and commissioning practice.
Decisions in context
I joined the authority as a graduate engineer in February 1997, three months after finishing my engineering degree, and spent seven years designing and testing signalling interlockings on regional lines. The culture was careful and hierarchical, and I am grateful for both. Every design was checked by someone who had not drawn it, and every installation was tested in the field before trains used it. The test that mattered most came in 1999, when a field check found one track circuit connected to the wrong relay after the bench tests had passed. I wrote the field-test checklist we used afterwards and led a crew of six from 2001. By 2004 I had worked on nine interlockings and trained twelve graduates. I left because I wanted to see the railway from the train's side, through the data a freight operator's locomotives produced.
Reason for the move
Wanted to work for a freight operator, where train data would describe what the train had actually done rather than what the infrastructure permitted.
What I am looking for next
I intend to stay at Morrowgate for at least the next three years. The second-stage depot connection in Melbourne, a decision on electrifying the Sydney port shuttle and the replacement of yard-management software at our three intermodal terminals all need finishing, and I want to hand my successor a technology estate that the board can see in full. If I later considered an executive move, it would be to a chief technology or chief operating role in a larger infrastructure or transport business, perhaps a port, an airport, a rail operator or an energy network, where physical operations and connected equipment matter as much as enterprise software. I would look for a board that wants technology risk reported plainly, a chief executive who expects disagreement on paper, and a business at the start of an energy or automation transition rather than at the end of one.
My more immediate next chapter is non-executive: a single board seat outside freight, taken with Morrowgate's consent, where I can learn the director's role before chairing anything.