What an unresolved commission taught me to ask

A commission statement was my first lesson in the difference between an expected amount and an agreed amount. At Xunheya Insurance Agency, where I began work in August 1997, a policy record could look complete while the corresponding settlement required a correction or an explanation from the insurer. I had recently graduated from Chengyulan Commerce College. My responsibility was to reconcile the records under supervision, not to decide what coverage a client needed. The work rewarded patient attention to the agreement behind the amount.

I learnt to distinguish a clerical mismatch from a genuine disagreement. A reference entered incorrectly could be repaired quickly. A different interpretation of the commission arrangement required the authorised commercial colleagues to resolve it. Treating both as ordinary overdue debt made the collection report look simple while obscuring what had to happen next. I prepared schedules that identified the missing evidence and the person who could obtain it. This was modest work, but it taught me that a useful financial report should point towards an action rather than merely describe a balance.

In August 2003 I joined Yanluwei Risk Brokers as a commission-control accountant. The corporate clients were larger, and placements could involve several participants and more complicated service arrangements. I had to learn the broker's role from experienced account teams. We helped clients arrange cover; we did not become the insurer because a substantial premium appeared in our records. I became careful about describing the company's scale through its own income and responsibilities, while retaining placement figures for the purpose they actually served.

My move to branch finance manager in August 2009 brought me closer to the cost of maintaining those client relationships. A branch could win new business and still struggle if servicing demands were underestimated or commission collection took longer than assumed. I worked with office leaders on staffing, travel, account-support costs and the timing of receipts. The discussions were sometimes uncomfortable because a relationship that looked valuable commercially could require more work than the first proposal acknowledged. Finance had to understand that work before recommending a price or a cost reduction.

I became group financial controller in August 2014. The company had grown beyond the point where informal explanations between familiar colleagues were enough. I introduced a consistent record of settlement differences and worked with the operating teams on how those differences were resolved. Specialist advisers supported reporting judgements. I also became involved in potential acquisitions, where the financial history often looked more stable than the underlying client relationships. An account could have renewed for years and still require a fresh choice by the client after a change in ownership or service team.

The chief executive appointed me CFO in August 2020. The founder remained closely involved in expansion decisions, and I needed to explain why a lower initial purchase price was not always the only way to manage uncertainty. Sometimes the better answer was to change which business we acquired, how the consideration depended on subsequent events or what service commitments we were prepared to assume. Those discussions required legal and client-service expertise alongside finance. I did not want an acquisition model to imply that a relationship could be transferred as reliably as a piece of office equipment.

One episode concerned a short-term operating-cash forecast that displayed all bank balances together. The supporting records showed that part of the total was held for clients and insurers. Nobody had transferred that money into operating use, but the presentation invited the wrong conclusion about our spending capacity. I required separate reporting and financed the timing gap from the company's own resources. The change was not a discovery of new profit or an accusation against the settlement team. It was a correction to the question the board was being asked to answer.

I have not served on a board. My experience is as an executive preparing recommendations and responding to directors' questions about financial performance, controls and expansion. A first external appointment would require me to learn how a different intermediary defines its obligations and manages client relationships. I would bring a practical understanding of income whose collection and persistence depend on other people's decisions. I would not claim the experience of an insurer's actuary, investment officer or underwriting executive. The boundaries matter because the same word, insurance, can describe businesses with very different promises and risks.

Open to Board appointments

Languages / Mandarin · English