- Sector
- Folding cartons and printed paperboard packaging for food, pet-care and household brands
- Ownership
- Third-generation family control; board includes two independent directors
- Company scale
- US$468 million revenue in 2025
- Employees
- 1,690
- Geography
- Four plants in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Kentucky; head office in Mansfield, Ohio
- Reporting to
- Chief executive; presents quarterly to the board's compensation committee
- Team
- 34 colleagues in plant HR, payroll, benefits and training, including four plant HR managers
- Financial scope
- US$146 million annual payroll and benefits cost; US$4.2 million HR and training budget; chief negotiator for three collective agreements
Mandate
Prepare the workforce for retirements in the skilled trades and for growth by acquisition, without lowering standards on any shift.
Outcomes
- Seventeen maintenance apprentices completed a four-year registered programme by mid-2025
- Mansfield third-shift first-year turnover reduced from 61 to 33 percent between 2021 and 2024
- First contract at the acquired Bowling Green plant ratified in December 2024 with no unfair labour practice charge against the company
- Contract maintenance spending reduced from US$2.6 million to US$1.1 million
Decisions in context
Corrinwood's family owners recruited me to prepare the workforce for retirements and acquisitions at the same time. I lead plant HR, payroll, benefits and training through four plant HR managers and a small corporate team, and I am chief negotiator for the company's three collective agreements. Each quarter I ask three questions. Who will maintain and set up our machines in five years? Is every shift staffed and supervised to the same standard? What will an acquired plant's employees experience in their first year with us? The cases on this site answer those questions imperfectly, and I say where. I present workforce reports and executive pay recommendations to the board's compensation committee, but I am not a director. The chief executive and I sometimes disagree in front of the committee about a workforce risk, which its chair has told us she prefers to a rehearsed consensus.
Reason for the move
Current appointment; seeking one compatible independent board role.
Feb 2014 — Mar 2019
Divisional human resources director
Calderhurst Trim Systems
- Sector
- Automotive interior trim: door panels, consoles and headliners for vehicle assembly plants
- Ownership
- Operating division of a privately held supplier group
- Company scale
- About US$720 million divisional revenue in 2018
- Employees
- 3,100 across five plants
- Geography
- Ohio, Indiana and Michigan
- Reporting to
- Division president
- Team
- 26 HR colleagues across five plants
- Financial scope
- Divisional people budget of US$5.1 million; labour cost planning for plant launches and closures
Mandate
Stabilise supervision and turnover across five plants while customers moved programmes between suppliers.
Outcomes
- Closed the Indiana door-panel plant with sixty days' WARN Act notice and placed 140 of 260 employees with nearby employers
- Introduced a twelve-week development course completed by 118 first-line supervisors
- Reduced divisional hourly turnover from 38 to 26 percent between 2014 and 2018
Decisions in context
As divisional director I moved from negotiating agreements to answering for the whole people record of five plants. Customers placed and withdrew vehicle programmes at short notice, so we hired for launches and planned reductions within the same year. The hardest decision was closing our Indiana door-panel plant in 2016. We gave the legal notice, held a hiring fair with nearby employers and kept HR staff on site until the last shift. A review that year showed most first-line supervisors had been promoted from the line with a handbook and no further preparation, and that their plants had the highest turnover. I built a twelve-week course with the plant managers and taught part of it myself. The experience persuaded me that supervisors decide whether a company's people policies are real. By 2019 I wanted a role where I could set those policies, not only apply them.
Reason for the move
Recruited to a chief human resources role covering the whole of a manufacturing company's people agenda.
Jan 2009 — Jan 2014
Labour relations manager
Calderhurst Trim Systems
- Sector
- Automotive interior trim for vehicle assembly plants
- Ownership
- Operating division of a privately held supplier group
- Company scale
- About US$540 million divisional revenue in 2013
- Employees
- About 2,700 across five plants
- Geography
- Ohio, Indiana and Michigan
- Reporting to
- Divisional human resources director
- Team
- Two labour relations specialists
- Financial scope
- Bargaining mandates for three collective agreements; grievance and arbitration costs
Mandate
Manage layoffs, recalls and contract negotiations at three unionised plants through the vehicle downturn and recovery.
Outcomes
- Negotiated four collective agreements without a strike
- Administered layoffs and recalls of about 900 hourly employees under seniority provisions
- Reduced open grievances at the Toledo-area plant from 74 to 19
Decisions in context
I joined in the worst months of the vehicle downturn. My first year consisted of layoffs, recalls by seniority, grievance meetings and an arbitration about pay for temporary transfers, which we lost because our supervisors had applied the rule three different ways. That loss taught me to read a collective agreement as a set of promises both sides once thought fair and to make sure our own managers knew what we had promised. I negotiated four agreements over five years, with the plant managers at my side and counsel for drafting. As volumes recovered, recall order and overtime distribution became the main disputes. I met each local's officers monthly, not only when a contract was due. Grievances fell at the plant where trust was lowest, mostly because we began answering them within the time limits the agreement set.
Reason for the move
Promoted to divisional human resources director.
Jun 2003 — Dec 2008
Plant human resources manager
Brindleford Controls
- Sector
- Thermostats, timers and wiring harnesses for household appliance makers
- Ownership
- Privately held, owned by its founding family
- Company scale
- About US$190 million annual revenue in 2007
- Employees
- About 650 at the Meadville plant
- Geography
- Meadville, Pennsylvania, with a harness operation opened in Mexico in 2007
- Reporting to
- Plant manager, with a dotted line to the corporate HR director
- Team
- Five HR, payroll and training staff
- Financial scope
- Plant HR budget of about US$900,000; hourly wage administration for 560 non-union employees
Mandate
Run the plant's people function and keep standards consistent across three shifts as production work began to move abroad.
Outcomes
- Brought night-shift induction and refresher training to day-shift standard
- Reduced first-year hourly turnover from 41 to 29 percent between 2003 and 2006
- Handled the first harness-assembly reductions with written selection criteria and outplacement for 85 employees
Decisions in context
Brindleford gave me my first plant to answer for. Its 650 employees were not represented, and the owners valued the informality of a family company. I kept some of that informality while writing down the rules people relied on: how shifts were bid, how overtime was offered and how a complaint was escalated. Night-shift induction had been a video and a walk to the workstation, so I made it equal to the day programme. From 2007 the owners began moving harness assembly to Mexico after their largest customer pressed for lower prices. I drafted selection criteria for the first reductions and arranged outplacement for those affected. The decision itself had been made before I was asked, which taught me how little influence a plant HR role carries at that stage. I left at the end of 2008 to learn bargaining in unionised plants.
Reason for the move
Left as the transfer of assembly accelerated, to gain unionised labour relations experience.
Mar 1998 — May 2003
Human resources generalist, later training and safety coordinator
Brindleford Controls
- Sector
- Thermostats, timers and wiring harnesses for household appliance makers
- Ownership
- Privately held, owned by its founding family
- Company scale
- About US$160 million annual revenue in 2002
- Employees
- About 700 at the Meadville plant
- Geography
- Meadville, Pennsylvania
- Reporting to
- Plant human resources manager
- Team
- No direct reports; coordinated twelve part-time shift trainers
- Financial scope
- Training budget of about US$180,000
Mandate
Support hiring and employee relations, then build structured safety and skills training for all three shifts.
Outcomes
- Wrote the plant's first structured induction for evening and night hires
- Trained 410 employees in lockout and hearing-conservation procedures
- Recruited a panel of twelve shift trainers from experienced operators
Decisions in context
I joined after evening courses in human resources, which I took while still scheduling presses. As a generalist I handled hiring, attendance cases and the first stage of employee complaints. In 2000 I became training and safety coordinator and spent most nights of my first month on the second and third shifts, where new hires had been learning from whoever stood next to them. I wrote a structured induction and recruited twelve experienced operators as part-time trainers, paid a premium for the hours they taught. I also ran the lockout and hearing-conservation training that OSHA standards require, and I learnt that a signed attendance sheet proved very little about what an operator did at the machine. During these years I began a part-time master's degree in labour and employment relations, finishing it shortly before my promotion.
Reason for the move
Promoted to plant human resources manager.
Jun 1994 — Feb 1998
Second-shift production scheduler
Hassingdale Press
- Sector
- Commercial web printing: catalogue inserts and retail circulars
- Ownership
- Privately held, owned by two founding partners
- Company scale
- About US$38 million annual revenue in 1997
- Employees
- About 210
- Geography
- Akron, Ohio
- Reporting to
- Production manager
- Team
- No direct reports; scheduled crews of about forty per shift
- Financial scope
- Job sequencing and crew allocation for two web presses and a bindery line
Mandate
Sequence print and bindery jobs on second shift and allocate crews to meet delivery dates.
Outcomes
- Cut average make-ready waiting time on second shift by about a fifth through job sequencing
- Introduced a shift handover sheet later adopted on all three shifts
- Recorded unplanned stoppages by shift, the first comparison the plant had kept
Decisions in context
I joined Hassingdale a month after graduating, expecting a career in production planning. The work involved sequencing jobs on two web presses and a bindery line so that circulars left on time. What I noticed was the roster. Seniority sent the newest press helpers to the evening and night shifts, while most of the mechanics worked days. When a web broke after midnight, the crew waited. I began recording stoppages by shift, and the production manager used my notes to argue for a night mechanic, which the owners approved in 1996. I also introduced a handover sheet so that problems did not disappear between crews. The job taught me that staffing patterns are decisions, even when nobody remembers making them. It sent me to evening classes in human resources and then into my first HR role.
Reason for the move
Moved into human resources after completing evening courses, drawn by the staffing patterns scheduling had revealed.
What I am looking for next
I intend to remain Corrinwood's chief human resources officer while taking on one independent board appointment. The company I would serve best is a mid-sized industrial manufacturer, privately held, family-controlled or owned by a long-term investor, with plants in which shift work, skilled trades and collective agreements carry real weight. A smaller listed company would also interest me if its compensation committee wanted a member who understands hourly workforces as well as executive pay. I would expect to join that committee or a nominating and governance committee rather than chair one in my first term. I can offer up to twenty-four days a year, subject to my employer's agreement and a review of customer, supplier and competitor relationships. What I hope to contribute is a practical reading of workforce risk: retirement exposure, turnover by shift, the cost of a labour agreement and the people integration of an acquisition. I would also expect to learn from directors whose experience lies in finance, customers and capital.