- Sector
- Fibre home broadband, enterprise connectivity and residual tower assets
- Ownership
- Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange; founding family 51 per cent, Singapore infrastructure investor 17 per cent
- Company scale
- Rp 4.62 trillion revenue and Rp 1.94 trillion EBITDA in 2025
- Employees
- About 2,850
- Geography
- Jakarta headquarters; Java, Bali and Sumatra
- Reporting to
- President director; reports to the board of commissioners and its audit committee on financial matters
- Team
- 132 finance colleagues through six managers
- Financial scope
- Reporting, treasury, tax, planning, investor relations and procurement finance; about Rp 1.9 trillion of annual capital expenditure
Mandate
Fund the move from towers to fibre without leaving the company exposed to currency or lease obligations it could not explain.
Outcomes
- Sold 1,640 towers for Rp 2.79 trillion and kept 740 needed by the network
- Held the first fibre wave within Rp 50 billion of budget through a weakening rupiah
- Removed dollar bank debt through Rp 2.3 trillion of rupiah funding
- Tightened the paying-connection definition and disclosed its reconciliation
Decisions in context
As finance director I am a member of the board of directors, so I share collective responsibility for management decisions as well as leading the finance function. That changes how I argue. I cannot simply object to a proposal; I must set out an alternative that the company can carry out. The past five years have been dominated by three questions: what to do with towers we no longer needed to own, how to pay for fibre priced largely in dollars, and how to fund the business in its own currency. I work closely with the audit committee, which is chaired by an independent commissioner, and with our external auditor. I have learnt to bring difficult numbers early, including a smaller subscriber figure that colleagues disliked. Each of those numbers was easier to defend because the commissioners heard it from us first.
Reason for the move
Current appointment; considering one compatible non-executive seat with my board's approval.
- Sector
- Fixed-wireless towers moving into fibre broadband
- Ownership
- Family-owned until a 2017 minority investment; listed December 2019
- Company scale
- Rp 1.3 trillion revenue in 2016, rising to Rp 3.2 trillion in 2020
- Employees
- About 1,100 rising to 2,300
- Geography
- Jakarta headquarters; Java and Sumatra
- Reporting to
- Finance director
- Team
- Eleven in treasury, growing to twenty-four across treasury and corporate finance
- Financial scope
- Bank funding, currency exposure, cash forecasting and listing preparation
Mandate
Finance the fibre build and prepare the company for public ownership.
Outcomes
- Arranged a US$260 million syndicated loan in 2018
- Raised hedge cover on dollar debt above the lenders' minimum
- Led financial preparation for the December 2019 listing
- Wrote the first public definition of the subscriber count
Decisions in context
I joined a company that was changing what it was. Its towers produced steady rental income, but the founders had decided that fibre to homes was the larger opportunity, and fibre needed far more capital. My first task was funding. We raised a syndicated dollar loan in 2018 because domestic rupiah funding of that size was harder to arrange at the time. I argued for more hedging than the banks required and won only part of that argument. I then led the financial work for our listing: three years of audited accounts, the prospectus figures, and the first written definition of a paying subscriber. Looking back, that definition was looser than it should have been, and I corrected it later as finance director. The listing also introduced me to public investors, whose questions were sharper than any lender's.
Reason for the move
Appointed finance director when my predecessor retired.
Regional treasury manager
Tembavari Holdings
Jan 2014 — Jun 2016
- Sector
- Regional telecommunications investment
- Ownership
- Privately held Singapore investment company
- Company scale
- Investments in operators with combined revenue of about US$2.1 billion
- Employees
- About 60 at the Singapore office
- Geography
- Singapore; investments in three Southeast Asian markets
- Reporting to
- Head of group treasury
- Team
- Three analysts
- Financial scope
- Dollar funding, currency exposure and lender reporting across three operating companies
Mandate
Give the shareholder a consistent view of currency risk in operators that earned in different local currencies.
Outcomes
- Built a common currency-exposure report for three operating companies
- Supported refinancing of US$400 million of operator debt
- Proposed hedging minimums later adopted by two of the operators
Decisions in context
Tembavari Holdings was the Singapore shareholder of my previous employer, and it invited me to join its regional treasury team. For the first time I saw telecom finance from an investor's chair. Each operator presented its results in local currency, while the shareholder thought in dollars and the lenders in covenants. My task was to make currency exposure comparable across three markets and to support each operator's refinancing. Living in Singapore also gave me access to lenders and investors who looked at Southeast Asia as one region and asked blunt questions. The experience confirmed a lesson I had first learnt from equipment budgets: a cheaper dollar loan is not cheaper if the business that repays it earns only in a weakening local currency. It also showed me how differently a shareholder and an operator read the same quarterly report.
Reason for the move
Returned to Jakarta to lead treasury at a growing fibre operator.
Head of financial planning
PT Samudrel Seluler
Jan 2009 — Dec 2013
- Sector
- Mobile telecommunications
- Ownership
- Privately held; Singapore regional investor as majority shareholder
- Company scale
- About Rp 9 trillion annual revenue at period end
- Employees
- About 4,200
- Geography
- Jakarta headquarters; operations across Indonesia
- Reporting to
- Chief financial officer
- Team
- Fourteen planning analysts
- Financial scope
- Annual budget, five-year plan, spectrum and licence payments, and network investment cases
Mandate
Connect network investment and spectrum obligations to a funding plan the company could sustain.
Outcomes
- Built a five-year view of spectrum and licence payments
- Introduced regional site-count reviews with network directors
- Reduced budget-to-actual capital variance from 18 to 7 per cent
Decisions in context
Financial planning at a mobile operator meant living with obligations that never ended. Spectrum licence fees were payable every year under a formula set by the communications ministry, and the company had also committed to an upfront payment for additional spectrum. I built a plan that showed those payments years ahead, so that each budget began with what we already owed rather than with what we hoped to spend. I worked with the network directors on how many new sites each region actually required, and on why the capital budget was so often underspent in one quarter and overspent in the next. My engineering background helped me challenge assumptions without pretending to make engineering decisions myself. I also learnt that a plan is only as credible as the colleagues willing to defend it with me.
Reason for the move
Invited by the majority shareholder to join its regional treasury team in Singapore.
Network capital-expenditure controller, later manager
PT Samudrel Seluler
Mar 2004 — Dec 2008
- Sector
- Mobile telecommunications
- Ownership
- Privately held; Singapore regional investor as majority shareholder
- Company scale
- About Rp 6 trillion annual revenue at period end
- Employees
- About 3,600
- Geography
- Jakarta headquarters; operations across Indonesia
- Reporting to
- Head of financial control
- Team
- Four controllers by 2008
- Financial scope
- Network capital budget, purchase-order tracking and asset capitalisation
Mandate
Track network spending by project, currency and timing rather than only by annual total.
Outcomes
- Separated dollar and rupiah commitments in the capital budget
- Reconciled purchase orders with installed sites across four regions
- Shortened asset capitalisation after installation from five months to two
Decisions in context
I moved into finance because I wanted to understand the budget that governed my engineering work. Capital-expenditure control was a natural bridge. I could read a network plan and talk to the engineers who had written it, but I now had to answer different questions: when the money would be paid, in which currency and when the asset would start to depreciate. Most network equipment was priced in dollars, so I split our commitments by currency for the first time. I also studied accounting part-time for three years, which gave structure to what I was learning on the job. The role taught me that finance and engineering were not opponents; each held only half of the facts a sound decision required. Reconciling the two records site by site was slow work, but it built trust on both sides.
Reason for the move
Promoted to lead financial planning.
Transmission engineer
PT Samudrel Seluler
Sept 1999 — Feb 2004
- Sector
- Mobile telecommunications
- Ownership
- Privately held; Singapore regional investor as majority shareholder
- Company scale
- About Rp 3 trillion annual revenue at period end
- Employees
- About 2,700
- Geography
- Jakarta headquarters; operations across Indonesia
- Reporting to
- Transmission planning manager, West Java region
- Team
- Individual contributor in a twelve-person regional team
- Financial scope
- Link designs and equipment requests for assigned clusters
Mandate
Plan microwave and leased-line links between cell sites and switching centres.
Outcomes
- Planned about 160 microwave hops in West Java
- Compared microwave and leased-line costs over five years for twenty routes
- Documented site power and rental costs omitted from link estimates
Decisions in context
My career began on hilltops rather than in an office. As a transmission engineer I designed the microwave links that carried traffic from cell sites back to the switching centre, and I visited many of the sites I planned. The technical work was satisfying, but I noticed that our cost estimates covered the radio and the antenna while leaving out the land rent, the generator fuel and the visits needed to keep a link working. I started keeping my own comparison of microwave and leased lines over five years, and my manager shared it with the finance team. That small spreadsheet led to my move into capital control, and it is still the habit I rely on: count the cost of owning something, not only of buying it. Field engineers taught me more about cost than any accounting course did.
Reason for the move
Moved into network capital control to work on the budget behind the network.
What I am looking for next
I am looking for one non-executive seat that I can serve properly alongside my role as finance director. In Indonesia that would be an independent commissioner position at a listed company; in Singapore or Malaysia, an independent non-executive directorship. I am most useful where a company spends heavily in advance, earns over many years and must decide which currency to borrow in: toll roads, logistics networks, data infrastructure, utilities or power distribution. I would avoid any company that competes with, supplies or rents to Lintasvara. I would expect to join an audit committee or a risk monitoring committee before taking any chair. My board of directors and commissioners must approve the appointment, and I would check the applicable limits on concurrent positions with our corporate secretary and counsel. Twenty-four days a year is a realistic allowance for me. I want a board that values careful financial questions and will tell me plainly where my telecom experience does not transfer.