Chief technology officer
Lautaneri Energy
Mar 2021 — Present
- Sector
- Solar-and-battery generation for island grids, with factory battery installations
- Ownership
- Privately held; Asian infrastructure fund 55 per cent since 2022, founders and management 45 per cent
- Company scale
- US$118 million revenue in 2025
- Employees
- 640
- Geography
- Singapore headquarters; plants in the Philippines and eastern Indonesia; control room in Cebu
- Reporting to
- Chief executive; presents quarterly to the board's risk and safety committee
- Team
- 86 engineers and technologists through five leads
- Financial scope
- About US$9 million annual technology operating cost plus platform capital; technical approval of plant equipment purchases
Mandate
Keep a dispersed fleet safe, controllable and secure while it grows, and explain its technical risks to cooperatives and the board.
Outcomes
- Derated and retrofitted twenty-three battery containers after a cooling failure
- Routed all supplier access to inverters through a company-run gateway
- Migrated twenty-six island plants to an independently tested site controller
- Cut interconnection testing at new plants from nineteen days to eight
Decisions in context
I lead the people who design, control and protect our plants, and the platform that tells us what each one is doing. The appointment came as the fleet passed thirty sites and the board wanted one executive accountable for technology risk rather than several managers sharing it. Most of my week is spent on choices with an operational cost attached: whether a battery runs at full power, which supplier may reach into our equipment, which software we write ourselves. I present to the risk and safety committee each quarter, including incidents and near misses, and I attend board meetings when technical matters are tabled. I am not a director. My five leads own battery safety, control systems, operational-technology security, the fleet platform and technology operations, and the battery safety lead holds derating authority independently of me.
Reason for the move
Current role; considering one compatible non-executive appointment.
Vice-president, engineering
Lautaneri Energy
Feb 2017 — Feb 2021
- Sector
- Island solar-and-battery plants under supply agreements
- Ownership
- Founder-owned, with growth-capital minority investors
- Company scale
- About US$64 million revenue in 2020
- Employees
- Four hundred and ten in 2020
- Geography
- Singapore; island plants in the Philippines and eastern Indonesia
- Reporting to
- Chief executive
- Team
- Grew from twenty-two to fifty-one engineers
- Financial scope
- Engineering budget and technical approval of plant designs
Mandate
Turn a set of individually engineered plants into a standard fleet that could be built and run at scale.
Outcomes
- Standardised container, inverter and cabinet designs across new plants
- Set up the Cebu control room with round-the-clock cover
- Grew the island fleet from nineteen plants to thirty-one
Decisions in context
When I arrived, almost every plant had been designed separately, which made spares, training and fault-finding harder than they needed to be. I wrote our first engineering standard, settled on one container family and one main inverter model, and built a commissioning procedure that each cooperative's engineer could follow. The standard was useful, and it also contained the supplier-access gap I found later. I set up the Cebu control room in 2018 with six operators; it now runs three shifts. Much of my time went on site visits, often with the cooperative's general manager, to agree how the battery should support the evening peak. The fleet grew from nineteen island plants to thirty-one, and I learnt how quickly a small company's informal engineering habits become inherited risk once a fund and lenders begin relying on them.
Reason for the move
Appointed chief technology officer when the board created a single technology role.
Head of remote site engineering
Merapika Tower Energy
Jul 2012 — Jan 2017
- Sector
- Power as a service for off-grid and weak-grid mobile-tower sites
- Ownership
- Privately held, backed by a regional infrastructure investor
- Company scale
- About US$140 million revenue in 2016
- Employees
- About 1,200 including field contractors
- Geography
- Indonesia and the Philippines; operations centres in Jakarta and Davao
- Reporting to
- Chief operating officer
- Team
- Nineteen engineers and analysts
- Financial scope
- Site equipment standards and the monitoring platform budget
Mandate
Reduce site outages and fuel loss across about 2,300 remote towers through better equipment and monitoring.
Outcomes
- Rebuilt alarm logic so that a silent site became an event
- Introduced solar and lithium-ion batteries at 480 high-diesel sites
- Reported site-security and fuel-loss findings to the audit committee
Decisions in context
Towers taught me the economics of distance. A visit to a remote site could cost more than the fault it fixed, so I designed equipment and monitoring to answer three questions from a distance: what is happening, can we change it and does someone need to go. After the silent battery bank in 2013, I rebuilt our alarm rules so that loss of contact triggered action. We added solar and lithium-ion batteries at the sites that burned the most diesel, which reduced fuel deliveries and the theft that came with them. I reported our site-security and fuel-loss findings to the audit committee several times, which was my first experience of explaining field engineering to non-executives. I left because I wanted my work to serve households and clinics directly rather than through a tower owner's contract.
Reason for the move
Joined an island power company to work on grids serving whole communities.
- Sector
- Battery and UPS installations for critical buildings
- Ownership
- Privately owned engineering firm
- Company scale
- About S$38 million revenue in 2011
- Employees
- About 160
- Geography
- Singapore and Malaysia
- Reporting to
- Technical director
- Team
- Fourteen engineers and technicians from 2010
- Financial scope
- Project designs and maintenance contracts for assigned customers
Mandate
Design, commission and maintain battery systems for telecom exchanges, hospitals and data rooms.
Outcomes
- Led the firm's first lithium-ion battery installations in 2011
- Wrote ventilation and thermal checks for battery-room inspections
- Completed a part-time master's in power engineering
Decisions in context
This was where batteries became my specialism. I designed lead-acid installations for telecom exchanges and hospitals, and I learnt to respect their quiet hazards: hydrogen, poor ventilation and heat that builds unnoticed in a closed room. I wrote the firm's inspection checks for those risks. In 2011 we installed our first lithium-ion systems, and I saw how different the safety case became when cooling failure could lead to one cell affecting another. I studied part-time for my master's during these years, mostly in the evenings, which gave me the theory behind what I was seeing on site. As engineering manager from 2010 I led fourteen people and learnt to supervise commissioning I could not attend myself, relying on test records rather than my own eyes. That discipline mattered later, when the sites I answered for were hundreds of kilometres apart.
Reason for the move
Moved to remote power, where batteries had to work without a building around them.
- Sector
- Substation protection and control integration
- Ownership
- Privately owned regional integrator
- Company scale
- About S$55 million revenue in 2007
- Employees
- About 240
- Geography
- Singapore headquarters; projects in Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines
- Reporting to
- Project engineering manager
- Team
- Worked in project teams of four to eight
- Financial scope
- Engineering hours and test programmes on assigned projects
Mandate
Configure, test and commission protection and control systems for utility and industrial substations.
Outcomes
- Commissioned protection schemes at eleven substations in three countries
- Introduced a recorded change log for relay settings on site
- Wrote factory and site test procedures used across later projects
Decisions in context
Most of my time here was spent in substations far from Singapore, configuring relays and proving that schemes tripped when they should and stayed closed when they should not. I learnt to read utility interconnection requirements carefully, because they describe behaviour that will be tested and must be demonstrated, not merely promised on paper. The most useful lesson came from a commissioning delay in Mindanao, where a relay setting changed for a good reason during testing had never been recorded. After that I kept a change log for every setting I touched, and the practice became standard on later projects. The work also showed me how much an engineer depends on a utility's operators, who know their own network better than any drawing. I moved on because I wanted to understand energy storage as well as protection.
Reason for the move
Joined a battery specialist to work on storage as well as control.
- Sector
- Electrical contracting for industrial and commercial buildings
- Ownership
- Family-owned contractor
- Company scale
- About S$30 million revenue in 2003
- Employees
- About 300 including site workers
- Geography
- Singapore
- Reporting to
- Senior project engineer
- Team
- No direct reports
- Financial scope
- Cable schedules, test records and variation estimates on assigned projects
Mandate
Support installation and testing of switchgear and transformers on building projects.
Outcomes
- Prepared cable and test schedules for four factory projects
- Witnessed switchgear and transformer testing
- Reconciled installed work against approved drawings
Decisions in context
My first job was practical and supervised. I prepared cable schedules, followed installation on site and witnessed testing of switchgear and transformers in factories and commercial buildings across Singapore. The senior project engineer I worked for checked everything I produced, and he insisted that I walk the installation against the drawing before signing anything. That habit has stayed with me. I learnt that drawings, test sheets and the equipment actually installed drift apart unless someone reconciles them deliberately, and that electricians on site usually know where the drift has happened. The firm was family-owned and tightly run, which taught me to price my own mistakes in labour hours. I left because I wanted to work on the systems that control power networks rather than only the equipment inside buildings, and protection engineering was the most direct route there.
Reason for the move
Moved into protection and control to work on utility systems.
What I am looking for next
I am looking for one non-executive appointment where technical risk sits close to the company's licence to operate: a power producer, a network or water operator, a port, or a manufacturer with critical plant. I would prefer to join a risk, safety or technology committee as a member rather than to chair anything, at least in my first term, and I would want an experienced chair willing to tell me where an engineer's instincts are not what the board needs. About twenty days a year is realistic alongside my executive role, subject to Lautaneri's consent and a review of supplier, customer and shareholder relationships. I am not looking for a seat that values technology as a talking point. The useful contribution I can make is narrower: helping directors ask what happens when equipment, a link or a supplier fails, who decides, and how quickly the people affected by the failure will hear about it.