CHAPTER 1
Apr 2022 — Present
Chief Marketing Officer
Melravi Cycle Journeys
- Sector
- Guided cycling experiences and bicycle rentals
- Ownership
- Founders 58%, domestic leisure-services fund 27%, employee vehicle 15%; no personal equity
- Company scale
- FY 2025–26 ₹61 crore: ₹42 crore guided experiences and ₹19 crore rentals
- Employees
- 146 enterprise colleagues; 25 in marketing
- Geography
- Jaipur marketing headquarters and selected neighbourhood experiences
- Reporting to
- Chief Executive Meera Telsarkar
- Team
- Twenty-five marketing colleagues through three leads
- Financial scope
- ₹5.3 crore annual expense, including ₹2.1 crore paid campaign spending
Mandate
Build audience propositions whose promise the operating plan can support
Outcomes
- Created a bounded resident programme from exploratory conversations
- Revised a sixty-person launch to the approved six-group arrangement
- Kept route and participant suitability with qualified owners
Decisions in context
The CMO role widened the question from how to promote an experience to why a particular audience might choose it. The resident conversations challenged our assumption that the visitor story should remain the default. I funded a defined programme rather than turn a small interview group into a forecast. The later launch required a different kind of discipline: the creative arrangement had to change when the operating group limit did not support it. Meera retains enterprise authority and Iqbal owns delivery. Three leads coordinate the marketing function, but their work should not create a promise guides must repair at departure. I want the customer’s reason to join and the operating owner’s ability to deliver considered together before the invitation becomes public. That responsibility includes changing an attractive concept when its main impression is unsupported.
Reason for the move
Current CMO appointment; preparing for one considered outside contribution
Concurrent appointment
Marketing employment without a statutory director appointment
CHAPTER 2
Apr 2017 — Mar 2022
Head of Marketing
Melravi Cycle Journeys
- Sector
- Marketing cycling experiences and visitor rentals
- Ownership
- Privately held founder-led leisure-services enterprise
- Company scale
- ₹44 crore company revenue in FY 2021–22
- Employees
- 108 company employees at March 2022
- Geography
- Jaipur audience and channel work
- Reporting to
- Executive responsible for commercial development
- Team
- Twenty-one marketing colleagues
- Financial scope
- ₹4.1 crore annual marketing expense
Mandate
Make the experience understandable across campaign and partner channels
Outcomes
- Approved the blanket gentle wording later withdrawn
- Led an eight-week correction across six selected route descriptions
- Kept descriptive information distinct from individual suitability assessment
Decisions in context
I had enough authority for a short phrase to travel across several channels with my approval. In 2019 that phrase described six selected routes as gentle. Two were predominantly flat and four had mixed gradients. We spent ₹38 lakh over eight weeks replacing the blanket description with specific route information. The correction did not certify individual fitness or accessibility. It restored details that should have remained available to the person making the choice. My responsibility was not limited to the factual accuracy of separate sentences; it included the main impression created by the campaign. This period made me more willing to change a promise at its centre rather than preserve it behind a qualification. The later CMO role extended that judgement into audience strategy and the operating arrangement implied by a larger launch concept.
Reason for the move
Promoted to CMO with wider audience and enterprise-brand responsibility
Concurrent appointment
Marketing employment without a statutory director appointment
CHAPTER 3
Apr 2011 — Mar 2017
Marketing Manager
Melravi Cycle Journeys
- Sector
- Cycling-experience marketing and customer communication
- Ownership
- Privately held experience operator with founder and domestic-investor interests
- Company scale
- ₹27 crore company revenue in FY 2016–17
- Employees
- 76 company employees at March 2017
- Geography
- Jaipur guided-experience and rental audience work
- Reporting to
- Commercial Director
- Team
- Sixteen marketing colleagues
- Financial scope
- ₹2.8 crore annual function expense
Mandate
Connect campaign expectations with the experience delivered by guides
Outcomes
- Worked with guides on the questions descriptions left unanswered
- Distinguished route information from personal suitability claims
- Followed customer expectations beyond the point of enquiry
Decisions in context
Joining the enterprise meant that I could hear what happened after someone responded to a campaign. Guides and operating colleagues encountered the expectations created by our images and words. A pleasing description could still omit the pace, meeting arrangement or participation condition that mattered to a particular person. Sixteen colleagues and ₹2.8 crore annual expense gave me a defined marketing remit, while qualified owners retained decisions about the route, equipment and participants. The work taught me to examine the invitation from the point of departure rather than only the point of response. That lesson should have prevented the later blanket route phrase. Its place in my career is to show that I had already encountered the relevant distinction before I failed to preserve it in a more influential campaign approval.
Reason for the move
Promoted to lead the marketing function across channels
Concurrent appointment
Marketing employment without a statutory director appointment
CHAPTER 4
Apr 2004 — Mar 2011
Partnerships Coordinator
Darselvi Visitor Services
- Sector
- Visitor-experience partnerships and communication
- Ownership
- Fictional privately held services practice
- Company scale
- ₹13 crore company revenue in FY 2010–11
- Employees
- 39 company employees at March 2011
- Geography
- Jaipur partner and visitor-service relationships
- Reporting to
- Partner responsible for visitor experiences
- Team
- Twelve partnership colleagues
- Financial scope
- ₹1.3 crore annual practice expense
Mandate
Help partners explain an offer without dropping the conditions behind it
Outcomes
- Connected channel descriptions with operating owners
- Examined what a shortened invitation allowed a customer to infer
- Retained delivery decisions outside the partnership function
Decisions in context
Partners wanted a description they could repeat easily. I learned that the shortening process could remove the condition a customer most needed to understand. A phrase that worked in a conversation with an experienced operator could become misleading when repeated without that context. I coordinated twelve colleagues within ₹1.3 crore annual expense and kept the relevant delivery owner in the discussion before changing the invitation. My team could improve communication, but it could not decide route suitability or replace the judgement of the people leading an experience. I wanted to follow the expectation beyond the partner channel and understand what the guest encountered at departure. Moving to Melravi gave me that continuing responsibility. It also made the consequence of my own campaign approval harder to treat as somebody else’s explanation problem.
Reason for the move
Joined an experience operator to follow the customer expectation through delivery
Concurrent appointment
Marketing employment without a statutory director appointment
CHAPTER 5
Jun 1997 — Mar 2004
Visitor-Services Assistant
Darselvi Visitor Services
- Sector
- Visitor enquiries and experience-support services
- Ownership
- Privately held fictional visitor-services enterprise
- Company scale
- ₹3.5 crore company revenue in FY 2003–04
- Employees
- 22 company employees at March 2004
- Geography
- Jaipur visitor-service practice
- Reporting to
- Supervising Visitor-Services Manager
- Team
- Member of a nine-person group; no line-management role
- Financial scope
- Assigned enquiry work without independent offer approval
Mandate
Understand the practical question behind a visitor’s interest
Outcomes
- Recorded questions about pace, meeting arrangements and expectations
- Passed suitability questions to accountable delivery colleagues
- Learned to recognise a condition missing from a description
Decisions in context
I entered the nine-person support group after completing history studies in May 1997. We helped explain experiences and passed questions to the people responsible for delivery. I could not independently approve an offer or decide whether it suited a particular participant. The useful work was often listening for the practical question beneath a general enquiry. Someone asking whether a ride was enjoyable might really need to know the pace or what would happen if they could not continue as expected. I learned that a description can attract interest while leaving the choice poorly understood. Later marketing responsibility gave me more influence over that description. I carried forward the habit of asking what the person needed to recognise before joining, even though the route-copy mistake shows that knowing the principle did not ensure I always applied it.
Reason for the move
Promoted to coordinate partner communication and a defined team
Concurrent appointment
Marketing employment without a statutory director appointment
What I am looking for next
I would consider a marketing mandate where audience development and the delivered experience can shape each other. The enterprise should allow a campaign’s main impression to be questioned, a small research finding to remain exploratory and an attractive launch concept to change when operations cannot support it. For a first outside-board contribution, I would seek a chair interested in the judgement behind customer promises and commercial experiments. My experience comes from executive presentation and reporting, and further governance preparation remains necessary. Twenty-two proposed annual days must include learning, preparation, meetings and exceptional demands alongside the CMO role. Employer consent and a specific eligibility and independence assessment would precede acceptance. I could help directors distinguish an invitation, a research hypothesis and an operating commitment without turning the board into a creative approval panel. The contribution should make the intended customer’s choice clearer while keeping delivery and qualified suitability decisions with accountable management.