Confidential mandate

Franchise Marketing-Fund Control Architect — Consumer Services

Planned Hiring / New

Franchise Marketing-Fund Control Architect mandate in Atlanta, United States · Multi-Brand Franchised Services

An Atlanta franchise group commissions a five-month architecture to reconcile franchisee contributions, national campaigns, local credits, agency commitments and restricted marketing cash across major brands.

The mandate

Franchisees contribute percentages of sales to national and regional funds, but brand teams commit media and agency spend before contribution, local-credit and carry-forward balances are final. Campaign benefits cross brands and markets, while corporate marketing activity enters the same procurement channels. Recent franchisee challenge exposed that cash, expense and contractual restriction could not be reconciled from a published fund statement.

The five-month deliverable is a contribution-to-campaign control architecture covering reported sales, contribution assessment, collection, waiver, local credit, media commitment, agency fee, production, shared campaign, rebate, carry-forward, restricted cash and franchisee reporting. It must separate contractual obligation, accounting treatment, cash availability and marketing-effectiveness judgement rather than use campaign performance to justify unsupported fund charging.

Milestone one at week three accepts the fund-and-contract inventory; week eight approves event maps and allocation principles; week fifteen completes two campaign and one franchisee-dispute rehearsal; and week twenty-two accepts control catalogues, statement bridges, governance and the implementation backlog. Fee release depends on client reproduction of source-to-statement evidence.

Acceptance requires Brand Finance and franchisee representatives to trace six contributions into campaign expenditure and local credits, resolve twelve unseen events including waiver, cross-brand creative, rebate and cancelled media, and reproduce an annual fund statement. Legal interpretation stays counsel-owned, and marketing effectiveness remains a separate commercial assessment rather than a proxy for contractual eligibility.

The client will provide franchise agreements, sales reports, contribution billings, bank records, campaign plans, media orders, agency contracts, invoices, rebates, local-credit registers, statements, ledgers and named franchisee contacts. The consultant does not interpret agreements legally, choose campaigns, measure advertising effectiveness, negotiate franchise disputes, approve spend, operate funds or issue assurance.

Why this is external work

Brand teams advocate campaigns, Procurement manages agency commitments, Finance closes expenses and franchisees scrutinise restricted contributions. Earlier controls grew around individual disputes and cannot explain the entire fund. Independent architecture can create transparent evidence across those incentives without taking commercial, legal or franchise-governance decisions.

What you will own

  • Map franchise sales, contribution rates, assessments, collections, waivers, credits and carry-forwards by brand and agreement.
  • Trace media, agency, production, shared campaign, rebate and cancellation events from commitment through fund statement.
  • Define eligibility and allocation evidence while routing contractual ambiguity to Legal and effectiveness to Marketing.
  • Reconcile restricted cash, receivables, commitments, expense, accruals, vendor credits and reported fund balance.
  • Rehearse local-credit, cross-brand, cancelled-media, volume-rebate, undercollection and disputed-sales cases.
  • Establish franchisee statement lineage, approval, access, correction, explanation and historical restatement controls.
  • Deliver event maps, allocation guide, control catalogue, statement bridge, training cases and prioritised implementation backlog.

Candidate qualifications

  • Led franchise, cooperative marketing or dealer-fund finance across several consumer brands and contract structures.
  • Reconciled sales-based contributions, waivers, local credits, media commitments, rebates, restricted cash and statements.
  • Designed defensible shared-campaign allocations without using advertising performance as contractual evidence.
  • Worked with franchisees, brand presidents, agencies, Procurement, Legal and auditors through contested fund use.
  • Built transparent source-to-statement controls that non-finance franchise representatives could reproduce.
  • Transferred durable designs through unseen disputes and campaign changes under independent client governance rather than retaining consultant-owned calculations.

Non-negotiables

  • Can complete four brand residencies and all three franchisee-evidence workshops inside five months.
  • Will disclose relationships with franchisors, franchisees, agencies, media owners, auditors and marketing vendors.
  • Brings restricted franchise-fund control across multiple brands; marketing FP&A alone is insufficient.
  • Will not interpret contracts, select campaigns, assess effectiveness, negotiate disputes, approve spend or issue assurance.
  1. 49 words maximum. Describe a marketing-fund charge you reversed after contract and campaign evidence were traced.
  2. 49 words maximum. Which cancelled-media or cross-brand event would you use to test allocation?
  3. 49 words maximum. What client records are indispensable before a franchisee statement can be accepted?

This mandate is confidential. The client is named only under a mutual NDA, and your own record is never listed, sold or shown to a company under your name until you release it for this specific mandate.