Confidential mandate
Principal-versus-Agent Revenue Accounting Director — Digital Marketplace
Urgent / New
Principal-versus-Agent Revenue Accounting Director mandate in Seoul, South Korea · Digital Commerce Marketplace
A Seoul marketplace commissions a four-month engagement to resolve principal-versus-agent revenue positions by product flow, creating controlled evidence that survives growth, contract change and audit challenge.
The mandate
The platform’s reported revenue has grown through retail, third-party marketplace, managed fulfilment, advertising, payments and bundled membership propositions. Existing accounting papers classify whole business lines, although responsibility for inventory, price, fulfilment, returns and customer remedies varies by product and merchant programme. New service combinations and algorithmic pricing now make inherited gross-versus-net conclusions difficult to defend.
The engagement deliverable is a Principal-versus-Agent Evidence Architecture organised around distinct promises and product flows rather than commercial labels. It will map contracts, platform behaviour, control indicators, inventory and fulfilment exposure, pricing discretion, customer responsibility, refund economics, ancillary services, transaction data and revenue presentation. An owned change trigger must cover every new programme and contract variation.
Milestone one in week three produces the proposition inventory and consequence-ranked conclusion gaps. Week seven completes evidence standards, decision trees and data requirements. At week twelve, milestone three tests representative transaction populations and six redesigned propositions. The final milestone at week seventeen delivers accepted accounting memoranda, controls, a governance forum, trained owners and an unseen launch simulation.
Acceptance requires Product and Legal to reproduce each material promise and responsibility from approved terms and actual user journeys; Finance to reconcile gross transaction value, consideration, refunds, incentives and recognised revenue; and Internal Controls to reperform sampled conclusions. The Chief Accounting Officer signs only when client teams classify ten unseen product variations without consultant-authored analysis.
The client will provide merchant and consumer terms, product specifications, fulfilment rules, pricing authorities, refund policies, transaction extracts, journal mappings, accounting papers, committee minutes, disclosures and audit findings. Management retains all accounting estimates and conclusions. Contract drafting, legal advice, product design, pricing strategy, data-platform implementation, audit opinion and restatement assessment are excluded.
Why this is external work
Commercial owners understand platform mechanics and Technical Accounting understands the literature, but rapid proposition growth has outpaced case-by-case evidence and durable change control. Independent specialists can reconstruct the factual promise chain and build repeatable governance without deciding product economics, rewriting contracts or serving as the external auditor.
What you will own
- Inventory retail, marketplace, fulfilment, advertising, payment and membership promises at a decision-useful product-flow level.
- Trace control indicators through contracts, platform rules, inventory exposure, pricing, acceptance, remedies and fulfilment practice.
- Distinguish merchant incentives, customer coupons, refunds, loyalty value, logistics fees and payment charges by accounting consequence.
- Reconcile order value, cancellations, returns, consideration flows, merchant settlement and recognised gross or net revenue.
- Build change triggers for new products, revised responsibilities, pricing algorithms, service bundles and jurisdictional contract variants.
- Exercise an own-brand listing, managed-fulfilment failure, price override, bundled subscription, refund exception and merchant insolvency.
- Transfer decision trees and evidence standards after client owners classify an unseen launch set and clear review.
Candidate qualifications
- Led revenue-recognition policy for a large digital marketplace, platform, travel intermediary or multi-sided commerce business.
- Resolved principal-versus-agent conclusions at promise and transaction-flow level rather than relying on broad business labels.
- Reconciled contracts and user journeys with pricing authority, fulfilment exposure, remedies, settlement data and ledger presentation.
- Governed incentives, refunds, loyalty, advertising, logistics, payment and subscription elements in bundled propositions.
- Worked across Product, Legal, Data and Audit while preserving management’s accounting responsibility and legal-advice boundaries.
- Delivered decision frameworks that internal teams applied reliably to launches and contract changes after engagement closure.
Non-negotiables
- The named director must lead Seoul product-flow workshops and the final unseen launch classification exercise.
- Direct marketplace principal-versus-agent experience is required; conventional product revenue accounting alone is insufficient.
- No current relationship may involve a material merchant, fulfilment partner, payment provider or appointed external auditor.
- Management owns accounting conclusions; legal advice, product design, pricing and audit opinion remain explicitly excluded.
- 49 words maximum. Describe a marketplace flow where contractual language and actual control indicators led to different conclusions.
- 49 words maximum. How did you reconcile gross transaction value to recognised revenue across refunds and incentives?
- 49 words maximum. Which unseen service bundle would best test whether client owners understand your framework?
This mandate is confidential. The client is named only under a mutual NDA, and your own record is never listed, sold or shown to a company under your name until you release it for this specific mandate.