Confidential mandate

Metals-Royalty Contract-Economics Architect

Planned Hiring / New

Metals-Royalty Contract-Economics Architect mandate in Vancouver, Canada · Mining Royalties and Streaming Finance

A Vancouver mining financier commissions a five-month architecture to reconcile operator statements, payable metal, deductions, price terms and royalty receipts across diverse international streaming agreements.

The mandate

Mine operators report production, recovery, payable metal, treatment and transport deductions through formats that vary by agreement. Price periods, provisional settlements, thresholds, step-downs and audit rights are interpreted in analyst models, while Finance records receipts after counterparties calculate them. Portfolio forecasts cannot distinguish operational change from contractual deduction, timing or disputed operator data.

The five-month deliverable is an operator-to-cash control architecture for net-smelter-return royalties, gross royalties, metal streams and production-linked payments. It must map ore and concentrate measures, recovery, payable metal, deductions, reference price, quotational period, minimum delivery, threshold, step change, currency, invoice, receivable and audit right without substituting models for contract interpretation.

Four milestones structure the work. Week four accepts the agreement-and-source inventory; week nine approves event and calculation maps; week sixteen completes two operator settlement reproductions and an adverse-assay case; and week twenty-two accepts controls, editable models, exception governance and the portfolio transition backlog. Fees are released only after client teams reproduce the evidence.

Acceptance requires Portfolio Finance to rebuild six settlements from operator source through contract calculation, invoice and cash; resolve ten unseen events involving grade, recovery, price period, deduction, threshold and amended mine plan; and reconcile portfolio forecast variance. Legal ambiguity remains counsel-owned, and technical mine evidence must be qualified by authorised specialists rather than inferred by Finance.

The client will provide executed agreements and amendments, operator reports, production and assay data, metal-accountability statements, invoices, receipts, pricing sources, audit correspondence, portfolio models, ledgers and named technical owners. The consultant does not audit a mine, verify reserves, issue legal or tax opinions, choose metal prices, negotiate claims, value investments or produce recurring invoices.

Why this is external work

Operators calculate amounts from data they control, investment teams model long-term value and Finance books invoices after receipt. Internal models have therefore become both forecast and unapproved contract interpretation. Independent architecture can make operator evidence and contract mechanics reproducible while leaving legal, technical, commercial and valuation conclusions with accountable specialists.

What you will own

  • Map agreement terms and amendments into production, recovery, payable metal, deduction, threshold, price and payment events.
  • Trace operator reports, assay and metal-accountability data through calculation, invoice, receivable, cash and forecast variance.
  • Define source hierarchy and exception handling for revised production, disputed grade, provisional price and late statement.
  • Separate contract interpretation, technical mine evidence, financial calculation, portfolio forecast and investment valuation.
  • Rehearse unseen recovery, deduction, price-period, threshold, expansion and closure events with client owners.
  • Establish operator evidence standards, audit-right triggers, calculation review, dispute logging and historical correction controls.
  • Deliver contract maps, editable settlement models, control catalogue, exception register, training cases and transition backlog.

Candidate qualifications

  • Led finance or commercial control for mining royalties, streams, offtake or production-linked investment agreements.
  • Reproduced settlements from mine production, recovery, payable-metal, deduction and reference-price evidence.
  • Reads complex royalty mechanics while preserving legal interpretation and technical reserve or production boundaries.
  • Challenged operator statements and internal forecasts across assay, provisional pricing, thresholds and amended mine plans.
  • Reconciled contract economics to invoice, receivable, cash, accounting and portfolio forecast across jurisdictions.
  • Transferred durable models and controls through unseen settlement events rather than retaining analyst-dependent calculations.

Non-negotiables

  • Can complete four operator residencies and both settlement-reproduction workshops within five months.
  • Will disclose relationships with operators, smelters, traders, technical advisers, auditors, lawyers and investors.
  • Brings mining contract settlement control; general natural-resources modelling alone is insufficient.
  • Will not audit mines, verify reserves, interpret law, choose prices, negotiate disputes or value investments.
  1. 49 words maximum. Describe a royalty settlement that changed after operator or contract evidence was reconstructed.
  2. 49 words maximum. Which recovery, deduction or price-period event would you use to test the model?
  3. 49 words maximum. What operator records are indispensable before a settlement can be accepted?

This mandate is confidential. The client is named only under a mutual NDA, and your own record is never listed, sold or shown to a company under your name until you release it for this specific mandate.