Confidential mandate
Music-Royalty Revenue Control Architect — Streaming Platforms
Planned Hiring / New
Music-Royalty Revenue Control Architect mandate in Stockholm, Sweden · Music Streaming Services
A Stockholm streaming group commissions a six-month architecture to reconcile subscriber revenue, usage allocation, minimum guarantees, publishing rights and royalty statements across complex global repertoires.
The mandate
Subscriber and advertising receipts are converted into territory and product pools before usage, licence terms and ownership claims determine rightsholder statements. Late track matches, duplicate works, disputed splits, artificial streams and minimum guarantees change economics after close. Finance can reconcile total expense but cannot reproduce why a particular recording, composition, territory and month received its reported allocation.
The six-month deliverable is a subscriber-to-rightsholder control architecture spanning plan revenue, taxes, refunds, bundles, advertising, pool construction, eligible usage, fraud exclusion, recording and publishing rights, ownership change, minimum guarantee, advance recoupment, currency and statement correction. It must preserve legal interpretation and commercial negotiation while making calculation inputs, versions and exceptions reproducible.
Milestone one in week four accepts the rights-and-revenue event map; week ten approves calculation boundaries and source hierarchy; week eighteen completes three repertoire and ownership rehearsals; and week twenty-six accepts the control catalogue, statement lineage, exception model and implementation backlog. Fees follow client acceptance after staff reproduce selected statements from approved source data.
Acceptance requires Rights Finance to trace six consumer payments into pools and statements, resolve twelve unseen events involving unmatched usage, ownership conflict, bundle allocation, fraud exclusion and guarantee true-up, and reconcile financial expense to payable and cash. Legal uncertainties must remain routed to counsel. A rights society must be able to follow correction history without consultant-created shadow data.
The client will provide product terms, billing and advertising receipts, tax mappings, usage events, fraud rules, licence extracts, ownership and repertoire files, guarantee and advance records, statements, ledgers and named rights owners. The consultant does not negotiate licences, decide ownership, adjudicate fraud, set royalty rates, produce live statements, post accounting or issue audit assurance.
Why this is external work
Commercial teams protect licence terms, Data teams process usage, Rights Operations resolves claims and Finance closes aggregate expense. Their systems were designed for throughput, not end-to-end explanation. Independent architecture can connect money, usage and rights without becoming negotiator, ownership adjudicator or production statement processor.
What you will own
- Map subscriber, bundle, advertising, tax, refund and currency events into territory, product and repertoire revenue pools.
- Trace eligible usage through match, ownership, split, licence, rate, minimum guarantee, advance and rightsholder allocation.
- Define source hierarchy and correction rules for unmatched tracks, duplicate works, ownership conflict and late claims.
- Govern artificial-stream exclusions, threshold changes and reinstatements without assuming fraud-investigation or artist-sanction authority.
- Reconcile calculated royalty expense, accrual, statement, payable, withholding and settlement cash across reporting periods.
- Rehearse unseen bundle, repertoire, ownership, usage and guarantee events with client Finance, Rights, Legal and Data teams.
- Deliver event maps, calculation lineage, control catalogue, exception taxonomy, training cases and implementation backlog.
Candidate qualifications
- Led royalty finance or rights-accounting control for a global music service, label, publisher or collecting society.
- Connected consumer revenue pools, usage, recording and publishing rights, licence terms, guarantees and statements.
- Resolved unmatched repertoire, disputed ownership, late claims and corrections without making unauthorised legal determinations.
- Governed usage-quality or artificial-stream exclusions while preserving investigation, commercial and artist-relations boundaries.
- Reconciled rights calculations to accruals, payables, withholding and settlement cash across territories and currencies.
- Built reproducible statement lineage that survived catalogue scale, ownership changes and rights-holder challenge.
Non-negotiables
- Can complete four rights-society residencies and all three statement-reproduction workshops within six months.
- Will disclose interests involving platforms, labels, publishers, societies, artists, fraud vendors, auditors and licensors.
- Brings track-to-statement royalty control at global scale; subscription revenue accounting alone is insufficient.
- Will not negotiate rates, decide ownership, adjudicate fraud, issue statements, post entries or provide legal opinions.
- 49 words maximum. Describe a royalty allocation that changed after usage or ownership evidence was corrected.
- 49 words maximum. Which bundle or minimum-guarantee event would you use to test pool construction?
- 49 words maximum. What client sources are indispensable before a statement can be reproduced?
This mandate is confidential. The client is named only under a mutual NDA, and your own record is never listed, sold or shown to a company under your name until you release it for this specific mandate.