Confidential mandate

Sanctions-Blocked-Funds Control Architect — Trade Finance

Planned Hiring / New

Sanctions-Blocked-Funds Control Architect mandate in Vienna, Austria · International Trade Finance Banking

A Vienna trade-finance bank commissions a five-month architecture for blocked funds, rejected payments, licence conditions and ledger ownership across complex restricted correspondent and commodity transactions.

The mandate

Payments may be rejected, returned, suspended or blocked after screening at originating, intermediary or beneficiary institutions. Operations records message status, Sanctions records the legal disposition and Finance records customer or bank liabilities, but case identifiers and release conditions do not align. A correspondent inquiry found aged balances whose ownership, licence condition and accounting treatment could not be reproduced.

The five-month deliverable is a payment-to-ledger control architecture for sanctions alerts that produce rejected, frozen, blocked, returned or licensed transactions. It must map message, party, goods, vessel, document, screening decision, legal instruction, account, currency, interest, fee, customer communication and eventual release or return while preserving privileged and need-to-know information.

Five milestones govern the work: week three accepts case populations; week seven approves disposition and ownership taxonomy; week twelve completes source and ledger walkthroughs; week seventeen rehearses licence, false-positive and ownership-dispute events; and week twenty-two accepts controls, aged-balance bridge, training cases and implementation backlog. Fees follow written client acceptance.

Acceptance requires Sanctions, Operations and Finance to trace twelve unseen cases from payment message through decision, custody, ledger and final disposition; reconcile all aged blocked-fund accounts; and prove dual control over release. Legal interpretation stays with counsel and authorised sanctions officers. Internal Audit must reperform selected cases without accessing information beyond approved roles.

The client will provide payment messages, screening events, case decisions, legal instructions, licence records, customer communication, account entries, correspondent confirmations, aged balances, policies and named owners. The consultant does not make sanctions decisions, file licence applications, release funds, contact authorities or customers, interpret law, investigate evasion, operate controls or issue assurance.

Why this is external work

Sanctions protects restricted decision material, Operations manages payment flow and Finance owns balances, so no function holds a complete shareable record by default. Independent architecture can create controlled linkage and clear ownership without broadening access or influencing case outcomes. It addresses financial integrity while leaving legal and compliance authority intact.

What you will own

  • Map payment, party, goods, vessel, document, alert, case, legal instruction, account and disposition identifiers.
  • Define ownership and evidence for rejected, returned, suspended, frozen, blocked, licensed and released funds.
  • Reconcile principal, currency, interest, fee, customer liability, bank liability and aged exception by legal entity.
  • Design least-privilege hand-offs among screening, investigation, sanctions decision, operations, treasury, finance and communication.
  • Rehearse false-positive, ownership dispute, licence expiry, correspondent block, partial return and release events.
  • Establish dual control, instruction verification, case-to-ledger lineage, ageing, escalation and audit-evidence protocols.
  • Deliver event maps, disposition taxonomy, reconciliation bridge, access model, training cases and implementation backlog.

Candidate qualifications

  • Designed blocked-funds or sanctions-payment controls within an international bank or regulated payment network.
  • Connected payment messages, restricted case decisions, legal instructions, accounts and final disposition across jurisdictions.
  • Reconciled customer and correspondent liabilities without expanding access to sensitive investigation information.
  • Understands trade-finance documents and payment chains while preserving sanctions, Legal and investigation authority.
  • Tested licence, return, release and false-positive events through controlled source-to-ledger evidence.
  • Transferred least-privilege workflows to Compliance, Operations, Treasury, Finance, Technology and Internal Audit under regulated conditions.

Non-negotiables

  • Can complete four operations residencies and all three controlled rehearsals within five months.
  • Will disclose relationships with banks, counterparties, regulators, authorities, screening vendors, advisers and auditors.
  • Brings sanctions blocked-funds control at transaction level; general financial-crime policy experience is insufficient.
  • Will not decide sanctions cases, seek licences, release funds, contact authorities, investigate or interpret law.
  1. 49 words maximum. Describe a blocked-funds balance whose ownership changed after payment evidence was traced.
  2. 49 words maximum. Which licence-expiry or correspondent event would you use to test dual control?
  3. 49 words maximum. What restricted client inputs are essential before case-to-ledger design begins?

This mandate is confidential. The client is named only under a mutual NDA, and your own record is never listed, sold or shown to a company under your name until you release it for this specific mandate.