Skip to website
Rohan QevmarsiChief Information Officer
Portrait of Rohan Qevmarsi

Chief Information Officer · India

RohanQevmarsi

Preserve the auction people were invited to enter

I grew up in Mumbai and completed a Bachelor of Science in Computing at the fictional Zelqorvi College of Computing in May 1996.

Open to
  • Board appointments
  • Advisory roles
  • Speaking invitations
  • Executive opportunities
Read the profileBegin a conversation

Preserve the auction people were invited to enter

In 2019 our latest inspection updates overwrote earlier descriptions for thirty-nine lots in a 240-lot catalogue. I had approved the design because it kept the screen current. It did not keep the earlier invitation available. We reconstructed twenty-seven prior editions from retained evidence; twelve could not be recovered. Commercial owners reoffered nine of those lots with fresh invitations and withdrew three. The gap was mine to explain, even though correcting a commercial offer was not mine to authorise.

I am Rohan Qevmarsi, fictional CIO of Nerqavzi Salvage Exchange in Rajahmundry. Raised in Mumbai, I began in systems services in 1996 and joined this regional auction agency in 2010. I lead thirty-two IT colleagues through four leads. Our ₹92 crore annual revenue is distinct from ₹1,120 crore of auction transaction value: a distinction that matters when describing both the business and my remit. I work with Maya, our CEO, and Arun, our COO, on the digital conditions in which commercial decisions are made.

An auction can be technically available while its invitation, bidder identity or restart decision remains unclear. A contact change may introduce a different legal entity. A restored server may resume a clock that commercial owners have decided to stop. A new bank detail may arrive without an authorised settlement decision. My work is to make those distinctions visible and usable without pretending that IT owns the underlying commercial, treasury or professional judgement.

Twelve missing catalogue editions stayed visible in the account

The ₹42 lakh repair preserved the twenty-seven reconstructions and the twelve unrecoverable versions separately. Nine fresh offers and three withdrawals were commercial decisions; we did not invent an earlier description to make the catalogue appear complete.

A recovered platform did not automatically restart the auction

After a twenty-seven-minute interruption affecting forty-eight lots, commercial owners paused and reoffered the lots the next day. ₹14 lakh buyer-fee credits and ₹63 lakh recovery work remained explicit costs of the response.

A changed bank field did not release seller funds

A twenty-four-request review separated nineteen confirmed changes from five held for further work. The ₹54 lakh workflow programme kept treasury approval distinct from IT's ability to update and display a record.

Current focus

I am making retention holds understandable to the people operating our systems. In a seventy-four-file review, nineteen files remained under a qualified hold while fifty-five moved to policy review. The ₹28 lakh controls preserve that distinction; they do not establish a universal retention period or allow IT to release a hold because storage housekeeping is overdue.

Conversations I welcome

I welcome CIO, advisory and speaking discussions about transaction-sensitive service systems. I am exploring a first company-board contribution, with eighteen days provisionally available. I registered in the IICA databank in February 2026, have not completed the proficiency assessment and claim no exemption. My executive presentations and former functional director title are not statutory board service.

I once let the latest inspection replace the catalogue record without preserving the edition bidders had seen. A more current screen had become a less faithful account of the transaction. I now ask which version, identity and commercial decision the system must preserve before asking how quickly it can refresh.

Rohan Qevmarsi

Chief Information Officer

Areas of stewardship

Where accountability has been mine.

  1. IPublished catalogue editions
  2. IIBidder identity and transaction continuity
  3. IIICommercial authority during service recovery
  4. IVSensitive record changes and retention states

Selected work

Decisions, and what they changed.

I

The current catalogue had erased an earlier invitation

In 2019, while I was IT director, an inspection update replaced the published descriptions of thirty-nine lots within a 240-lot catalogue.

The full account

II

A bidder contact change concealed a different participant

In 2022 our operators reviewed forty-two requests described as bidder-detail updates.

The full account

III

Restoring the platform did not restart forty-eight auctions

A twenty-seven-minute platform interruption in 2023 affected forty-eight lots during an auction session.

The full account

In the words of others

Trusted by those who appoint.

In this fictional account, Rohan did not describe the catalogue repair as recovery of every earlier invitation. He retained the twelve missing editions, his own design responsibility and the commercial choices we still had to make. That made the board discussion more useful than a report centred only on the new history feature.
Maya QevrantiFictional CEO, Nerqavzi Salvage Exchange
The invented recovery case worked because Rohan's team supported the decision to keep forty-eight lots paused after the platform returned. He separated the technical evidence from our commercial reoffer decision and helped the notices reflect the same authorised position across the operating channels.
Arun VelqomziFictional COO, Nerqavzi Salvage Exchange

The journal

Perspective, set down with care.

Auction records and systems judgement · 2026-08-11 · 5 min read

An auction catalogue needs a past tense

Why preserving an earlier invitation is a different responsibility from displaying the latest inspection, and why a missing edition must remain an acknowledged gap.

Read the essay

An invitation

Contact

I welcome CIO, advisory and speaking discussions about transaction-sensitive service systems. I am exploring a first company-board contribution, with eighteen days provisionally available. I registered in the IICA databank in February 2026, have not completed the proficiency assessment and claim no exemption. My executive presentations and former functional director title are not statutory board service.

Open to
  • Board appointments
  • Advisory roles
  • Speaking invitations
  • Executive opportunities
Write to Rohan

office@rohanqevmarsi.example