Skip to website
Zoya VezqaniChief Strategy Officer · Essays & perspective

Zoya Vezqani · Chief Strategy Officer · India

I carried the division before advising on its future

Jan 2022 — Present

Chief Strategy Officer

Nalvzeri Industrial Screens

Sector
Woven industrial screening meshes for non-food materials handling
Ownership
Regional industrial holding company 55%, working management 35%, employee trust 10%
Company scale
₹348 crore revenue and ₹29.4 crore operating profit, FY ending March 2026
Employees
1100 employees
Geography
Kanpur manufacturing and commercial base, India
Reporting to
CEO Ishaan Delzhavi
Team
Fourteen colleagues through three managers
Financial scope
₹4.6 crore annual strategy expense; no independent approval of company investments

Mandate

Choose the commercial responsibilities the replacement business should build around its products

Outcomes

  • Continued an eight-customer planning pilot on a limited basis with its ₹64 lakh overall deficit disclosed
  • Selected eight prepaid stock allocations instead of a wider consignment proposal
  • Revised a replacement scenario and declined to launch a bundled installation service

Decisions in context

Strategy changed my relationship with the operating account. I now lead fourteen colleagues through three managers rather than the replacement division itself. My annual expense delegation pays for strategy work; the authorised bodies decide investment, while finance, technical and operations leaders retain their responsibilities. I have tried to bring the experience of running a division into that advisory position without behaving as though the old reporting lines still belong to me. The planning-service pilot tested that restraint. I had backed the idea, and its positive direct contribution was easier to repeat than its overall deficit after setup. Correcting my own account mattered before asking others to change theirs. The current work concerns which continuing obligations belong beside our product business and which would require a different organisation, rather than assuming that every recurring fee improves the company's direction.

Reason for the move

Current appointment; investigating one compatible first external board contribution

Sept 2015 — Dec 2021

General Manager, Replacement Division

Nalvzeri Industrial Screens

Sector
Industrial screening products and replacement supply
Ownership
Regional industrial holding company, working management and employee trust
Company scale
₹276 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2016
Employees
920 company employees at entry
Geography
Kanpur and regional industrial customer accounts
Reporting to
Chief Executive Officer
Team
88 divisional colleagues through six managers
Financial scope
Divisional account: ₹121 crore revenue and ₹10.2 crore operating profit, FY ending March 2016

Mandate

Carry the replacement division's financial and customer responsibilities together

Outcomes

  • Made stock commitments part of commercial-route discussions
  • Required proposed service additions to identify their continuing operating work
  • Separated divisional economics from the scale of the manufacturing company

Decisions in context

Running the division meant explaining a result after the customer conversation had become an operating obligation. Eighty-eight colleagues and six managers worked across the replacement account. Its revenue and operating profit were a subset of the company, not figures to be added to company totals. I had to understand why a seemingly modest service addition could consume attention from people already carrying another responsibility. I also saw the appeal of stock held close to customers and the capital behind that appeal. These were not reasons to avoid growth. They were reasons to describe the undertaking before approving its commercial promise. When the opportunity to lead strategy arose, I wanted to examine those questions across the business rather than simply defend the division I had been running. The transition required letting the next operating leader own the account while using the experience to improve the choices presented to management.

Reason for the move

Moved into company strategy to examine the future business model beyond the existing division

Apr 2008 — Aug 2015

Head of Aftermarket

Nalvzeri Industrial Screens

Sector
Industrial screening meshes and aftermarket supply
Ownership
Regional industrial holding company, working management and employee trust
Company scale
₹184 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2009
Employees
620 company employees at entry
Geography
Kanpur and northern Indian industrial customers
Reporting to
Commercial Director
Team
42 colleagues through four managers
Financial scope
Aftermarket account: ₹58 crore revenue and ₹5.4 crore contribution, FY ending March 2009; company overheads reported separately

Mandate

Develop the commercial work surrounding a customer's replacement requirement

Outcomes

  • Connected replacement enquiries with the records needed to interpret them
  • Examined stock funding alongside the proposed customer offer
  • Brought specialist owners into discussions of service responsibility

Decisions in context

I joined Nalvzeri because aftermarket work kept the customer relationship close to the physical product without reducing it to a new-equipment sale. Forty-two colleagues and four managers handled the account. The contribution figure was a divisional measure with company overheads separately reported; it was not the company's operating profit. I learned to ask which records a customer retained and which assumptions we were making about the next replacement. A familiar product reference could be useful, but an operating condition still needed its qualified owner. The work also made stock funding concrete. Someone financed material before the next buying event, and the chosen commercial route determined who that would be. My promotion followed a broader need to carry those customer, resource and financial questions within one divisional account, with the people required to make the commitments workable.

Reason for the move

Promoted to general manager with a wider divisional financial and people account

Oct 2000 — Mar 2008

Export Account Manager

Velzhani Screenworks

Sector
Regional industrial screening-mesh manufacture
Ownership
Privately held by working founders and a local investment trust
Company scale
₹97 crore company revenue, FY ending March 2001
Employees
340 company employees at promotion
Geography
Kanpur base with selected export accounts
Reporting to
Head of Commercial Operations
Team
Twelve colleagues through two leads
Financial scope
₹2.1 crore annual account-management expense; ₹36 crore commercial portfolio revenue, FY ending March 2001

Mandate

Maintain the commercial account after the product leaves the factory

Outcomes

  • Clarified ownership of continuing support questions in customer accounts
  • Kept account revenue distinct from delegated management expense
  • Completed a part-time MBA in November 2006

Decisions in context

Account management changed the point at which I could consider a piece of work finished. Dispatch mattered, but the relationship continued through questions about records, future requirements and support. Twelve colleagues worked through two leads. The commercial portfolio's revenue was not money I could spend, and the annual expense allocation did not give me authority over every consequence of the account. I learned to make those distinctions in conversation as well as in the numbers. My part-time MBA at Norqeli Strategy Institute, completed in November 2006, helped me examine the economics behind a service promise while I continued working. The move to Nalvzeri offered a larger aftermarket responsibility in which those questions were central. I wanted to understand the business after the first sale, including what a manufacturer should retain and where a different specialist should carry the next obligation.

Reason for the move

Accepted an aftermarket leadership role with a larger continuing customer and people remit

Jul 1994 — Sept 2000

Order Planner

Velzhani Screenworks

Sector
Regional industrial screening-mesh manufacture
Ownership
Privately held by working founders and a local investment trust
Company scale
₹38 crore revenue, FY ending March 1995
Employees
180 employees at entry
Geography
Kanpur, India
Reporting to
Planning Supervisor
Team
Member of a seven-person order-planning group; no staff supervision
Financial scope
No personal spending delegation; assignments agreed by the planning supervisor

Mandate

Translate an accepted commercial request into an intelligible planning account

Outcomes

  • Raised unresolved scope questions before treating an order as ready for planning
  • Learned how commercial dates depended on responsibilities beyond the order form
  • Connected customer requests with the colleagues authorised to interpret them

Decisions in context

Economics studies ended in May 1994 and factory planning began that July. The seven-person group gave me a practical education in the difference between a request and an undertaking. I did not supervise colleagues or approve expenditure. My work was to help the planning supervisor understand what had been accepted and which question still needed a commercial or technical answer. A customer date could look definite before the responsibility behind it had been clarified. I learned not to treat that uncertainty as merely somebody else's paperwork problem. The export role later appealed because it would let me follow the conversation beyond the factory's immediate planning horizon. I wanted to understand what the customer believed would happen after dispatch and how the business could keep that account accurate without asking a product label or an order form to explain every obligation on its own.

Reason for the move

Moved into export account management to carry the relationship beyond order planning

What I am looking for next

The board role I am considering would be my first statutory appointment. I want to work with an industrial company weighing a change in how it earns: perhaps a service beside a product, a different stock commitment or a replacement market whose apparent predictability needs examination. My contribution would come from running a division and then having to challenge a strategic proposal I had sponsored. I would not arrive with a ready-made service model for the company to adopt. I would first need to understand its economics, specialist capabilities and existing directors. Within this fictional career my databank registration dates from September 2026, with assessment and other preparation still ahead. Twenty-four days annually is only a provisional capacity estimate, and my employer's consent would be necessary. A useful appointment should leave room to question an attractive proposal collectively while keeping executive responsibility with management. I would judge the fit by that contribution and by the relationships that could prevent me from making it independently.