Maitreyi ShomraliChief Marketing Officer · Essays & perspective

Maitreyi Shomrali · Chief Marketing Officer · India

Closer to the work the buyer is trying to buy

CHAPTER 1 · Jan 2020 — Present

Chief Marketing Officer

Serlavi Language Systems

Sector
Software-localisation engineering and multilingual product-content services
Ownership
Employee ownership trust 70%; founding group 30%
Company scale
₹142 crore revenue and ₹17 crore operating profit, FY 2026
Employees
480 employees at March 2026
Geography
Kolkata, Bhubaneswar and Kochi; clients in India and international markets
Reporting to
CEO Ritwik Neshpali
Team
32 marketing colleagues through four heads
Financial scope
₹8.8 crore annual function/programme budget; sales owns contracts

Mandate

Make the company's market story useful to buyers and consistent with the capability and responsibilities behind the service.

Outcomes

  • Used a 48-bid review to distinguish four primary service concerns
  • Rebuilt eleven of thirty-six demonstration journeys before publication
  • Postponed a ₹72 lakh campaign while preparing its response route
  • Replaced word-count-led discovery material with a fuller preparation brief

Decisions in context

As CMO I am accountable for the choices our market story encourages, not only the attention it attracts. My thirty-two colleagues work through four heads, and the ₹8.8 crore budget covers the function and programmes within my remit. Sales owns contracts and delivery owns execution. Those boundaries make collaboration necessary: I cannot promise a conversation that nobody is available to conduct or describe a service without understanding what the buyer must prepare. The recent cases show where we changed our own material and plans rather than attribute every difficulty to the market. I also want the resulting account to remain proportionate. A better demonstration or brief is useful work, but its completion does not by itself prove a revenue effect. We need to examine later outcomes separately and retain the basis of the decision made at the time.

Reason for the move

Current role; considering a selective external board contribution alongside executive work.

CHAPTER 2 · Sept 2014 — Dec 2019

Head of Market Development

Serlavi Language Systems

Sector
Software-localisation and multilingual release services
Ownership
Founding group until 2018; thereafter employee trust 70% and founding group 30%
Company scale
₹78 crore revenue, FY 2015
Employees
290 employees at March 2015
Geography
Kolkata and Bhubaneswar with international client development
Reporting to
Chief executive
Team
24 colleagues through three managers
Financial scope
₹5.6 crore annual marketing and market-development expense

Mandate

Develop international demand with a credible discovery and response process behind each market proposition.

Outcomes

  • Brought sales-response capability into campaign planning
  • Distinguished language adaptation from market readiness
  • Supported a consistent service explanation during the employee-ownership transition

Decisions in context

International campaigns made me more aware of the distance between a translated invitation and a useful buyer conversation. Our team could commission language material, but sales and delivery had to be able to respond to the questions it raised. I learned to investigate that process directly instead of assuming a country label told us how every buyer would behave. The ownership transition in 2018 also required clear internal and external communication about what had changed and what the business continued to provide. I led three managers and a ₹5.6 crore expense envelope, rather than the whole international sales result. During part of this appointment I held a separate non-executive board term at Vemrali Learning Services, disclosed through the appropriate process. The CMO promotion expanded my functional remit while leaving contracts and service execution with their authorised owners.

Reason for the move

Promoted to CMO with responsibility for the full marketing function.

CHAPTER 3 · Mar 2008 — Aug 2014

Product Marketing Manager

Serlavi Language Systems

Sector
Software-localisation engineering and language-review services
Ownership
Privately held by its founding group
Company scale
₹34 crore revenue, FY 2008
Employees
160 employees at March 2008
Geography
Kolkata delivery and commercial teams
Reporting to
Commercial director
Team
14 product-marketing colleagues
Financial scope
₹2.8 crore annual marketing expense

Mandate

Explain localisation work in terms that prospective software buyers could relate to their release process.

Outcomes

  • Worked with specialists to place language examples in interface context
  • Separated translation volume from integration and testing needs
  • Built discovery material around buyer preparation questions

Decisions in context

My introduction to localisation came through engineers and language reviewers who could explain why a sentence could not be assessed properly without knowing where it appeared. A word count was useful for some purposes but said little about the surrounding release work. I learned to ask for a demonstration of the journey, the source changes and the person who would accept the result. I did not become the specialist authority on those questions; my task was to make their relevance understandable in market-facing material. Fourteen colleagues and a ₹2.8 crore expense responsibility gave us enough scope to build a coherent product story, provided we kept listening to delivery. The move into market development followed as the company needed that explanation to work across different buyer groups and international campaign settings.

Reason for the move

Promoted to lead market development as the company broadened its international activity.

CHAPTER 4 · Oct 2001 — Feb 2008

Marketing Executive; Marketing Manager from 2005

Nelmethi Software Services

Sector
Business-software implementation and support services
Ownership
Founder-owned private company
Company scale
₹27 crore revenue, FY 2007
Employees
130 employees at March 2007
Geography
Kolkata and regional business clients
Reporting to
Head of commercial services
Team
Individual contributor initially; seven colleagues from 2005
Financial scope
₹90 lakh annual programme budget from 2005; no company revenue authority

Mandate

Support service demand and help prospects prepare for a useful implementation discussion.

Outcomes

  • Connected campaign material with the questions delivery teams needed answered
  • Developed more practical service-introduction content
  • Progressed to a seven-person marketing team with a defined programme budget

Decisions in context

Moving from an agency to a software-services company brought me closer to what happened after an enquiry. A buyer could be enthusiastic and still lack the context needed for a sensible proposal. I began spending more time with account and delivery colleagues to understand where the conversation stalled and which questions our material could help answer earlier. My promotion in 2005 added seven colleagues and a ₹90 lakh annual programme budget, but did not make me the owner of contracts or implementation outcomes. That distinction helped me see marketing's practical contribution without claiming the work of other functions. I left for Serlavi because the specialist service offered a chance to develop a more substantial product story and learn from a team whose work depended on both language and software context.

Reason for the move

Joined a specialist localisation business to develop a deeper product-marketing remit.

CHAPTER 5 · Jul 1996 — Sept 2001

Account Coordinator

Dovrali Business Communications

Sector
Business publications and service-campaign communications
Ownership
Private partnership of three principals
Company scale
₹6 crore revenue, FY 2001
Employees
42 employees at March 2001
Geography
Kolkata with regional service-company accounts
Reporting to
Account director
Team
Individual contributor within a five-person account team
Financial scope
No delegated budget or purchasing authority

Mandate

Coordinate briefs, approvals and production for business communications assignments.

Outcomes

  • Learned to resolve different interpretations before finalising copy
  • Kept approval changes connected to the client's brief
  • Understood how polished language can conceal an incomplete service explanation

Decisions in context

My first job was to keep a brief moving without losing its meaning as it passed between client, writer, designer and production team. That was harder than it sounded. Several people could approve the same sentence while imagining different services behind it. I learned to ask a plain question before making the language more elegant, especially when a client used a familiar phrase that nobody had defined. I worked in a five-person account team under an account director and had no budget authority. The role taught me respect for craft, but it also made me curious about the buyer's experience after the publication was delivered. Joining Nelmethi let me follow that next stage and understand whether the communication had helped someone make a better service decision rather than merely recognise the company name.

Reason for the move

Moved in-house to follow a software-service proposition beyond campaign production.

What I am looking for next

I would consider a new external board term where my experience in specialist services and international market development could add a useful perspective. My previous appointment taught me that a director must examine the whole business, including the obligations created by an attractive proposition, rather than act as an advocate for one function. I would want to understand the company's customer economics, delivery model and ownership expectations before deciding whether I could contribute. Twenty days annually is a provisional allowance to be tested against induction, travel and exceptional work, with employer consent and a fresh conflict review. I would be particularly interested in a board asking whether growth into another market is supported by the capability to serve it. I would not promise to bring customers or redesign a campaign from the boardroom. The contribution should be thoughtful challenge, a willingness to learn the unfamiliar parts of the business and an ability to connect the market story with what the organisation can responsibly deliver.