- Sector
- Credit union service organisation providing a shared mobile, online and small-business banking platform
- Ownership
- Owned by 58 credit unions; not listed
- Company scale
- US$118m revenue in 2025, from client platform fees
- Employees
- 640 at June 2026
- Geography
- 74 client credit unions in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois, Michigan and Indiana
- Reporting to
- President and chief executive; presents quarterly to the board's product and risk committee
- Team
- 6 direct reports; 148 product managers, designers, researchers, accessibility specialists and content writers
- Financial scope
- US$39m product and design budget (2026); joint owner with the chief technology officer of a US$64m annual platform roadmap
Mandate
Turn a heavily configured app into one product that works for every member of every client, make it accessible, build small-business banking and prepare the platform for consumer-permissioned data access.
Outcomes
- Moved 74 credit unions from separately themed apps to one design system; screen-reader task completion in member testing rose from 58% to 91%.
- Moved 94% of third-party data traffic from stored-password sign-ins to token connections by June 2026; automated sign-ins fell 81%.
- Launched a thirteen-week cash-flow view used monthly by 41% of active business members at 31 credit unions.
- Kept 73 of 74 client credit unions through the design-system restriction; one left at its 2024 renewal.
Decisions in context
I joined Lanternfield to turn a platform that had grown by saying yes to every client into a product with clear limits. When I arrived, each of our 74 credit unions ran a differently configured app, accessibility depended on each client's choices and almost a third of sign-ins came from software rather than members. My remit covers product management, design, research, accessibility and content for consumer and business digital banking; engineering reports to our chief technology officer, with whom I share the roadmap. The main decisions since 2022 have been the shared design system and its limits on customisation, token connections with the Connected apps page, and the business cash-flow view. I present quarterly to the board's product and risk committee and publish a decision log to every client credit union, including the requests we have declined. I am an officer of Lanternfield, not a director, and I hold no role at any client.
Reason for the move
Current appointment; delivering the 2027 roadmap, including small-dollar credit presentation and examination evidence for client credit unions.
Sept 2017 — Mar 2022
Senior vice president, head of consumer digital and deposit products
Corriston Bank
- Sector
- Regional retail and commercial banking
- Ownership
- Subsidiary of Corriston Bancorp, a listed bank holding company
- Company scale
- US$1.6bn–US$1.9bn annual revenue during tenure; US$34bn of assets in 2021
- Employees
- About 6,900
- Geography
- Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio and Tennessee
- Reporting to
- Head of consumer banking; presented fee changes to the board risk committee
- Team
- 5 direct reports; 92 product, design and analytics colleagues
- Financial scope
- Consumer checking and savings with US$14bn of balances; overdraft and returned-item fee income of US$96m in 2019; US$22m annual digital budget
Mandate
Rebuild the consumer mobile app and online account opening, then redesign checking accounts and their fees.
Outcomes
- Raised the share of new checking accounts opened digitally from 19% to 46%.
- Redesigned overdraft and returned-item fees; fee complaints fell 64% and losses on overdrawn accounts fell from US$9.8m to US$6.1m.
- Introduced a projected end-of-day balance showing pending items for 1.3 million checking accounts.
- Built a payment-deferral request flow that handled about 41,000 requests in 2020.
Decisions in context
Corriston hired me to modernise a mobile app and online account opening that customers rated poorly and branches worked around. I led product, design and analytics for consumer digital banking and for checking and savings products, reporting to the head of consumer banking. The first two years went on rebuilding account opening and the app's balance and payment screens. That work exposed the gap between the balance customers saw and the one the bank charged against, and it led to the overdraft redesign of 2020, which I took to the board's risk committee with the revenue effect stated plainly. During the pandemic my team also launched deposit-hold notices and a payment-deferral request flow. I left when Lanternfield offered the chance to make the same kind of decisions for many credit unions at once, which drew me back to the institutions where I had started.
Reason for the move
Recruited by Lanternfield to lead product for a shared platform serving 74 credit unions.
Feb 2012 — Aug 2017
Vice president, rewards and card experience products
Quillmore Card Services
- Sector
- Consumer credit cards, including own-brand and co-brand rewards cards
- Ownership
- Listed card issuer
- Company scale
- US$2.3bn–US$2.8bn annual net revenue during tenure
- Employees
- About 4,100
- Geography
- United States; operations in Omaha, Nebraska, and Tucson, Arizona
- Reporting to
- Executive vice president, consumer card products
- Team
- 4 direct reports; 38 product and analytics colleagues
- Financial scope
- Rewards programme costing about US$310m a year across 3.2 million active accounts; card servicing app and statements
Mandate
Bring the rewards programme's effect on cardholders under measurement, and rebuild the servicing app and statement.
Outcomes
- Ended points expiry for open accounts in good standing; rewards complaints fell 72%.
- Reduced voluntary attrition among active rewards accounts from 9.4% to 7.9%.
- Rebuilt the statement so that the rewards balance and redemption options appeared on one page.
- Added testing with cardholders who use assistive technology to every servicing app release.
Decisions in context
I took over a rewards programme whose costs finance understood well and whose effect on cardholders nobody had measured. My remit covered rewards design, redemption, the card servicing app and statements for 3.2 million active rewards accounts. Our analysts could tell me the value of each redemption option but not who was losing points or why. I introduced quarterly reviews of complaints and redemption by cardholder group, ended points expiry for open accounts in good standing in 2015 and rebuilt the statement so that the rewards balance, any expiry for closed accounts and the redemption options appeared together. I also brought testing with cardholders who use screen readers and magnification into every release of the servicing app. I left when Corriston offered me deposit products, because I wanted to work on the everyday accounts where most customers' surprises begin.
Reason for the move
Moved to Corriston Bank to lead deposit products and consumer digital banking.
Jun 2007 — Jan 2012
Director, card servicing and disputes product
Quillmore Card Services
- Sector
- Consumer credit cards
- Ownership
- Listed card issuer
- Company scale
- US$1.9bn–US$2.3bn annual net revenue during tenure
- Employees
- 3,600–4,000
- Geography
- United States; operations in Omaha, Nebraska, and Tucson, Arizona
- Reporting to
- Senior vice president, card operations
- Team
- 14 product managers, designers and analysts
- Financial scope
- Servicing and disputes handling about 1.4 million requests a year at a cost of about US$41m
Mandate
Move card disputes and routine servicing from telephone and post to online channels, and reduce disputes the product caused.
Outcomes
- Built online dispute filing, card replacement and travel notices; a third of disputes were filed online by 2011.
- Cut disputes caused by unrecognised merchant names by 38% through work with merchant services on statement descriptors.
- Introduced testing with cardholders who use screen readers after a 2009 test exposed an unusable dispute form.
- Reduced the average time to resolve a non-fraud dispute from 41 days to 26.
Decisions in context
This role moved me from running dispute operations to designing the products that produced disputes. Quillmore handled about 1.4 million card disputes and servicing requests a year, almost all by telephone and post. I led a small product team that built online dispute filing, card replacement and travel notices, and I worked with merchant services to improve the merchant names shown on statements, the largest single cause of disputes that were not fraud. I studied human-computer interaction part time during these years, in the evenings, and our 2009 test with a blind cardholder who could not complete the new dispute form shaped how I have worked ever since. By 2011 a third of disputes were filed online. The role taught me to treat a complaint queue as a product backlog, and to count a feature as finished only when the people most likely to struggle with it had used it.
Reason for the move
Promoted to lead rewards and card experience products.
Mar 2003 — May 2007
Disputes analyst, then disputes operations manager
Quillmore Card Services
- Sector
- Consumer credit cards
- Ownership
- Listed card issuer
- Company scale
- US$1.5bn–US$1.9bn annual net revenue during tenure
- Employees
- 3,100–3,600
- Geography
- United States; disputes centre in Omaha, Nebraska
- Reporting to
- Head of disputes operations
- Team
- Manager from 2005: 26 dispute specialists
- Financial scope
- Team resolving about 9,000 disputes a month
Mandate
Work card disputes, then manage a disputes team and improve the accuracy of its decisions.
Outcomes
- Built a register of product-caused disputes that covered about 31% of non-fraud volume by 2006.
- Raised the team's decision accuracy in quality review from 88% to 96%.
- Proposed fixing dispute causes rather than adding staff, which led to the creation of a servicing product team.
Decisions in context
I moved from Duluth to Omaha to learn card payments at a scale a credit union could not show me. I started as a disputes analyst, working cases under the card network rules and the federal requirements on billing errors and unauthorised use, and became manager of a team of twenty-six specialists in 2005. I began keeping a register of disputes the product itself had caused: confusing merchant names, free trials converting without notice and refunds that were slow to post. By 2006 the register covered about 31% of our non-fraud volume. I took it to the head of card operations with a proposal to fix causes rather than add staff, and that conversation led to my move into product. Managing specialists also taught me how measures change behaviour. When we watched only cases closed per day, accuracy fell, so we added quality review and the numbers recovered.
Reason for the move
Moved into product to lead the design of online disputes and servicing.
- Sector
- Community credit union: deposits, consumer and auto loans, mortgages
- Ownership
- Member-owned, state-chartered credit union
- Company scale
- About US$44m annual revenue; US$640m of assets
- Employees
- About 210
- Geography
- North-eastern Minnesota and north-western Wisconsin
- Reporting to
- Branch supervisor, then lending operations manager
- Team
- Individual contributor
- Financial scope
- Consumer and auto loan files and payment schedules for a portfolio of about US$290m
Mandate
Serve members at the counter, then process consumer loan files and improve lending operations correspondence.
Outcomes
- Rewrote late-payment letters in plain language with the collections supervisor; calls asking what a notice meant fell by about a third.
- Reconciled payment schedules on about 1,200 auto loans after a system conversion.
- Presented a proposal on loan-file checklists to the operations committee, which adopted it in 2002.
Decisions in context
Skaarland was my apprenticeship in what members actually experience. I started at the counter in July 1999, two months after graduating, opening accounts, taking deposits and answering questions about fees I had not designed and could not always justify. In 2001 I moved into lending operations as an analyst, processing consumer and auto loan files, reconciling payment schedules and drafting the letters members received when a payment was late. I rewrote those letters in plain language with the collections supervisor, and calls from members asking what a notice meant fell by about a third. The credit union was small enough that its chief executive knew most staff by name, and he let a junior analyst present a proposal to the operations committee. I left in 2003 to work in card disputes, but I kept the habit of reading every letter a product sends before it goes.
Reason for the move
Moved to Quillmore Card Services to learn card payments and disputes at scale.
What I am looking for next
I plan to remain at Lanternfield through our 2027 roadmap, which includes the small-dollar credit redesign and the evidence package our client credit unions need for their examinations, and I am not seeking another executive role. A search partner should treat that as my present position. If I considered an executive move in the longer term, it would be to a chief product role at a mutual, cooperative or consumer-facing financial institution where the product function owns fee design, accessibility and data permissions together, and where the chief executive expects product to bring the board the costs of its decisions as well as the launch dates. I would want a reporting line to the chief executive, authority over design and research as well as product management, and a strong engineering partner rather than an engineering reporting line. I would not consider a role defined mainly by growth through partnerships whose fees fall on members. My nearer ambition is the single non-executive seat described on my board readiness page.