- Sector
- Commercial and institutional kitchen equipment
- Ownership
- Listed on the Standard Market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange; founding family holds about thirty-one per cent
- Company scale
- ¥48.6 billion revenue and ¥3.1 billion operating profit in the year to March 2026
- Employees
- 1,480 across the group
- Geography
- Japan, with a Thai plant and export sales across Southeast Asia and to Japanese restaurant groups abroad
- Reporting to
- President and chief executive; presents to the board of directors without being a director
- Team
- 212 in product planning, design engineering, industrial design, certification and service-parts engineering
- Financial scope
- Product portfolio margin and a ¥2.4 billion annual development budget
Mandate
Rebuild the portfolio around ageing kitchen crews, longer equipment lives and honest connected features without losing the institutional tender business.
Outcomes
- Lowered the rice line's loading height to 820 millimetres and its loaded pan to 9 kilograms
- Extended repair parts to ten years after production for five core families
- Held the connected oven until its record marked gaps and uninserted probes
- Cut unavailable-part causes of unrepaired calls from 6.8 to 2.1 per cent
Decisions in context
I was the company's first chief product officer, appointed when the president decided that product planning, design and service parts should answer to one person. My mandate was to make the portfolio fit kitchens that were losing staff and keeping equipment longer. I chair the product committee that approves every brief, and I present development spending and field-safety matters to the board. The three cases on this site come from this period, and each cost the company something measurable: output, component savings or a tender. I share accountability for portfolio margin with the sales and manufacturing heads, who report separately to the president. My team includes certification engineers for six export markets and the service-parts group I once belonged to. I have learnt to bring disagreements to the president in a single paper, with the objecting colleague's case set out fairly beside mine.
Reason for the move
Current appointment; considering one compatible outside directorship.
- Sector
- Commercial and institutional kitchen equipment
- Ownership
- Listed company with the founding family as largest shareholder
- Company scale
- About ¥41.2 billion revenue in the year to March 2021
- Employees
- 1,390 across the group at period end
- Geography
- Japan, Thailand and export markets in Southeast Asia
- Reporting to
- Director responsible for engineering
- Team
- Thirty-eight product planners and industrial designers
- Financial scope
- Product briefs and business cases for about ¥1.6 billion of annual development
Mandate
Give product planning a disciplined brief process that reflected how equipment was used and repaired in the field.
Outcomes
- Required service-parts engineers to sign every product brief
- Introduced in-kitchen testing with working crews for all institutional products
- Prepared the first portfolio review of parts periods and controller generations
Decisions in context
Returning from Thailand, I found that our product briefs began with competitor specifications and ended with a sales forecast. Dealers, meanwhile, were reporting customers who scrapped sound equipment for want of a board, and care-home kitchens were asking for controls that new staff could use on their first shift. I rebuilt the brief so that it opened with the people who would load, clean and repair the machine. Service-parts engineers became signatories, which slowed some approvals and stopped two redesigns that would have stranded older controllers. We also began testing prototypes in customers' kitchens rather than our demonstration room. I reported to the engineering director and presented major briefs to the management committee. The portfolio review we prepared in 2020 showed how many controller generations we were supporting, and it became the evidence for the parts decision I later took as CPO.
Reason for the move
Appointed Chief Product Officer when planning, design and service parts were combined.
- Sector
- Assembly and sale of commercial kitchen equipment
- Ownership
- Wholly owned subsidiary of Kamadosei Kitchen Equipment
- Company scale
- About 2.1 billion baht of annual sales at period end
- Employees
- 310 at period end
- Geography
- Assembly plant in Chonburi province; sales to Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam and Singapore
- Reporting to
- Managing director of the subsidiary; functional line to the head of engineering in Osaka
- Team
- Forty-four engineers, technicians and certification staff
- Financial scope
- Variant development and local engineering budget of about 120 million baht a year
Mandate
Adapt the Japanese range for Southeast Asian kitchens and build the local engineering needed to support it.
Outcomes
- Developed fryer and rice-cooker variants for bottled gas, local power and local rice
- Placed trained service engineers in three countries before starting sales there
- Declined distributor orders that required unsupported domestic models
Decisions in context
Thailand taught me that a variant begins in the destination kitchen. Hotels and caterers there cooked with bottled gas, worked in greater heat and humidity, and used rice that behaved differently from Japanese short-grain. My team adapted burners, raised component temperature ratings and wrote new cooking programmes, while certification staff worked with local laboratories on each country's electrical and gas requirements. I reported to the subsidiary's managing director, with a functional line to engineering in Osaka. The difficult decisions were refusals. Two distributors wanted domestic fryers shipped with adapters at a lower price, and I declined because we had no engineers or parts in their territories. That cost about a sixth of one year's planned sales. I also learnt to manage engineers whose first language was not mine, which changed how I write instructions and test whether they have been understood.
Reason for the move
Recalled to Osaka to lead product planning for the whole group.
- Sector
- Commercial and institutional kitchen equipment
- Ownership
- Listed company with the founding family as largest shareholder
- Company scale
- About ¥33.5 billion company revenue at period end; rice and kettle products about ¥5.2 billion
- Employees
- 1,150 at period end
- Geography
- Japan; plant in Shiga Prefecture
- Reporting to
- General manager, institutional products
- Team
- Two product planners, working with a design group of fifteen
- Financial scope
- Product line results and development proposals for institutional rice and kettle equipment
Mandate
Keep the institutional rice and kettle range competitive in municipal and contract-caterer tenders.
Outcomes
- Introduced a lighter, two-piece kettle lid for the 2009 range
- Recorded crew ages and loading tasks in thirty-two customer centres
- Added cleaning access to the rice line that reduced daily washing time by about twenty minutes
Decisions in context
Rice-cooking lines and rotary kettles are bought by municipalities and contract caterers through tenders that reward capacity and floor area. I learnt the tender documents in detail, but I learnt more by spending whole mornings in school-lunch centres. The crews were older than our specifications assumed, and the heaviest tasks fell to whoever arrived first. I recorded crew ages and tasks in thirty-two centres, which later became evidence for the loading-height decision. Within my own authority I could make smaller changes: a two-piece kettle lid that one person could lift, and cleaning access that shortened the daily wash. I could not yet change the line's capacity specification. I reported to the general manager for institutional products and worked with a design group of fifteen. The appointment showed me how a tender specification can fix working conditions for fifteen years.
Reason for the move
Selected to lead product and engineering at the Thai subsidiary.
- Sector
- Commercial and institutional kitchen equipment
- Ownership
- Listed company with the founding family as largest shareholder
- Company scale
- About ¥29.8 billion revenue at period end
- Employees
- 1,060 at period end
- Geography
- Japan; limited exports
- Reporting to
- Manager, field quality
- Team
- Five-person field-quality group; no direct reports
- Financial scope
- Analysis of service reports and parts supply; no budget authority
Mandate
Turn dealer service reports into evidence that designers and the quality-assurance director could act on.
Outcomes
- Built the first table linking each spare part to its products and supply end date
- Prepared evidence for field-action reviews chaired by the quality-assurance director
- Rewrote two customer safety notices for kitchen managers
Decisions in context
Kamadosei hired me partly because I had been a persistent critic from the dealer side. My work was to read service reports and returned parts and explain what they showed. I built the first table linking each spare part to every product that used it and to the date its supply would end, and it revealed how often a minor redesign had stranded older machines. I also prepared evidence for field-action reviews. The quality-assurance director made those decisions; my contribution was to separate nuisance faults from hazards and to say how quickly the affected units could be found. I rewrote two customer notices so that a kitchen manager could understand the action required without calling the dealer. I had no budget and no staff, which made persuasion the only tool available to me and taught me to bring designers evidence rather than complaints.
Reason for the move
Moved into product management for the institutional range.
Apr 1994 — Sept 2000
Field service engineer
Nadakaze Kitchen Service
- Sector
- Installation and servicing of commercial kitchen equipment from several manufacturers
- Ownership
- Privately owned dealer-installer
- Company scale
- About ¥2.4 billion of annual sales at period end
- Employees
- Eighty-five at period end
- Geography
- Hyogo and Osaka prefectures
- Reporting to
- Service manager
- Team
- One of fourteen field engineers; trained two junior engineers from 1998
- Financial scope
- Service calls and parts orders for assigned customer accounts
Mandate
Install, maintain and repair kitchen equipment for hotels, hospitals and restaurants in the Kobe area.
Outcomes
- Reconnected and tested gas equipment in kitchens rebuilt after the 1995 earthquake
- Maintained equipment for about 120 contract customers
- Trained two junior engineers in fryer and dishwasher repair
Decisions in context
I joined Nadakaze straight from my degree and spent six years in other people's kitchens, mostly at night. We serviced equipment from several manufacturers, which let me compare how each designed for repair. Nine months after I started, the Great Hanshin earthquake damaged much of the area we served, and for a year our work was reconnecting and testing gas equipment so that kitchens could reopen safely. Later I maintained equipment for about 120 contract customers and trained two junior engineers. The lessons were practical: which parts cooks removed for cleaning, which seals failed under a hose, and which manufacturers changed boards so often that a sound machine became scrap. I reported to the service manager and ordered parts within the account limits he set. I left when Kamadosei asked me to bring the dealer's view into the manufacturer.
Reason for the move
Recruited by Kamadosei to work on field quality and spare parts.
What I am looking for next
I intend to stay in my executive role and add one outside directorship. The seat I would find most useful is at a Japanese manufacturer whose products are used for many years by people who did not choose them: care and nursing equipment, housing equipment such as baths and water heaters, food machinery or medical devices outside my own sector. Those boards face the questions I work on daily, including ageing users and installers, the length of parts support, field safety and what a connected product honestly records. I would expect to join an audit and supervisory committee or a voluntary product-quality committee under an experienced chair, not to lead one in my first term. My employer must approve the appointment, and any company that competes with Kamadosei or trades with it in a material way would be excluded. I have about twenty-four days a year available, including preparation and site visits, and I would rather visit a plant and a customer than read about either.