Skip to website
Suvendu QezronthiChief Financial Officer

Executive summary / Personal profile

Price the unfinished work before celebrating the fee

Portrait of Suvendu Qezronthi

Chief Financial Officer India

I want an animation project’s financial account to describe the work still required, rather than allow an attractive fee or a reassuring cash balance to settle the question.

Open to Board appointments · Executive opportunities

Start a conversation

01 / Leadership approach

The finance team should ask what work remains before describing what a project has earned. Cash, fees and costs become useful when the obligations beside them are visible to the people making the next decision.

02 / Areas of responsibility

  • Cost-to-complete reviews for commissioned work
  • Customer advances and delivery cash commitments
  • Relevant-cost comparisons for production sourcing
  • Financial challenge within creative production
Enterprise revenue
₹134 crore
FY2025–26; animation and finishing services
Finance team
28 colleagues
Four heads reporting within the CFO remit
Recorded career
32 years
Project accounts through animation-company finance leadership

Evidence from practice

Replacing the margin I had accepted with a cost-to-complete account
In 2019 I accepted a management estimate showing ₹1.8 crore expected cost against a ₹2.4 crore animation fee.
Deferring discretionary work after separating the advance-funded delivery account
In 2023 management was considering a ₹7 crore discretionary programme against an ₹18 crore cash balance.
Withdrawing an outsourcing saving claim that retained most internal cost
In 2025 an external finishing proposal quoted ₹1.6 crore for a defined package.
The complete case record ↗

Price the unfinished work before celebrating the fee

In 2019 I accepted an animation project’s ₹1.8 crore expected cost against a ₹2.4 crore fee without making the remaining-work estimate sufficiently explicit. We had already incurred ₹1.1 crore. Production’s revised account required a further ₹1.2 crore, bringing expected cost to ₹2.3 crore and leaving ₹10 lakh before central costs, rather than the ₹60 lakh previously shown. Iqbal challenged the assumption behind my paper. I had allowed the apparent margin to survive because the work still ahead of us was described less precisely than the spending already recorded.

I now lead finance at Vezqalni Animation Works in Bhubaneswar. The 310-person company recorded ₹134 crore FY2025–26 revenue across commissioned animation and finishing services. Twenty-eight finance colleagues work through four heads within ₹4.8 crore annual function expense and a separate ₹1.6 crore systems programme. I report to Nandita, our CEO, and present to directors without holding a statutory seat. I own no personal equity. Production, accounting and contractual decisions retain their qualified owners; my responsibility is to make the financial consequence available before the enterprise commits.

Later reviews concerned customer advances inside a cash balance and an outsourcing proposal whose internal comparison included costs that would remain. In the first, ₹12 crore of an ₹18 crore balance related to commissioned work with ₹9 crore forecast delivery outflow. In the second, a ₹1.6 crore external quote could not be described as a saving against ₹1.4 crore internal cost when ₹1 crore would continue after outsourcing. These are management decision accounts, not revenue-recognition or legal opinions. My next contribution should help a company distinguish the attractive number from the obligation it must still carry. An outside appointment would require further governance preparation, specific assessment and a workable twenty-three-day annual proposal.

The remaining-work estimate changed the project account

₹1.1 crore incurred plus ₹1.2 crore forecast remaining cost left ₹10 lakh against a ₹2.4 crore fee before central costs.

Advance receipts carried an unfinished delivery commitment

₹12 crore customer advances within an ₹18 crore cash balance sat beside ₹9 crore forecast delivery outflow.

The outsourcing comparison retained costs that would survive

Only ₹40 lakh of the ₹1.4 crore internal account was avoidable; the ₹1.6 crore external quote did not remove the other ₹1 crore.

A finance function connected to production judgement

Twenty-eight colleagues through four heads examine project commitments with production owners and the CEO.

Current focus

Project finance that keeps remaining production obligations visible

Conversations I welcome

Finance leadership and a prepared first outside-board contribution

The leadership record

Trusted with consequential decisions.

In the boardroom

  • Vezqalni Animation WorksExecutive finance presenter; not a statutory director · April 2021–present

Formation

  • Bachelor of CommerceTeqvazli Commerce College · 1994
Suvendu explained why the bank balance did not settle our discretionary spending proposal. He made the remaining production commitment visible without claiming the residual was automatically available to spend.
Nandita ZevqorliChief Executive, Vezqalni Animation Works; fictional colleague
The full record ↗

Contact

Finance leadership and a prepared first outside-board contribution

  • Board appointments
  • Executive opportunities