From document-room work to operating responsibility
Apr 2021 — Present
Chief Operating Officer
Talruqen Mortgage Operations
Sector
Mortgage-record custody and processing services
Ownership
Two founders and an employee trust
Company scale
₹47 crore FY2025–26 service revenue
Employees
285
Geography
Bhopal headquarters; four records centres in central India
Reporting to
Chief Executive Officer
Team
228 operations colleagues through five leads
Financial scope
₹27 crore approved annual operating budget; no lending authority
Mandate
Deliver contracted custody and retrieval services with explicit acceptance and release evidence.
Outcomes
Separated 386 intake differences from a 24,600-file transfer
Changed retrieval reporting to distinguish dispatch from usable handover
Staged a 68,000-file transition around trained capacity
Decisions in context
As COO I am responsible for the work performed by four centres and the transition team. The role requires me to connect staffing, service promises and commercial terms, rather than improve each in isolation. My recent cases involved accepting incomplete source material, correcting a misleading completion label and declining an accelerated intake. I work with the commercial and finance leaders on the cost of those choices, while client decisions outside our contract remain with the client. I report to the CEO and present significant operating matters to the board by invitation. I do not hold a director seat. The most useful change in my own practice has been to require a named decision owner for an exception, instead of allowing every difficult question to become an informal personal escalation to me.
Reason for the move
Current appointment; exploring a future operating remit after an agreed succession and transition.
Apr 2015 — Mar 2021
Regional operations head
Talruqen Mortgage Operations
Sector
Financial-services records administration
Ownership
Privately held; founder-controlled
Company scale
₹21–36 crore annual service revenue over tenure
Employees
164–242
Geography
Three records centres in central India
Reporting to
Chief Operating Officer
Team
Three centre managers and 137 staff at period end
Financial scope
₹13.6 crore regional operating budget at departure
Mandate
Make service capacity and unresolved requests visible across centres.
Outcomes
Introduced stage-specific review of delayed retrievals
Established cover arrangements for trained release staff
Reduced unassigned exceptions from 147 to 39 in a quarterly review
Decisions in context
Regional responsibility exposed differences that were obscured by the company total. One centre might have enough storage space but too few experienced checkers; another could retrieve quickly but struggle with unclear release instructions. I began reviewing a sample of failed requests with the managers rather than asking only for explanations of aggregate performance. The process made operational errors visible alongside problems in source material or client instructions. My remit included staffing and expenditure within the regional budget, but not renegotiating every contract independently. I brought recurring commercial issues to the appropriate lead with examples and an estimate of work involved. The appointment prepared me for company-wide responsibility by showing how a service promise made elsewhere becomes a practical decision in a centre, often after the original discussion has been forgotten.
Reason for the move
Promoted to COO after a planned expansion of the centre network.
Jul 2009 — Mar 2015
Client transition manager
Talruqen Mortgage Operations
Sector
Mortgage records transitions and administration
Ownership
Two founding shareholders
Company scale
₹11–21 crore annual service revenue over tenure
Employees
96–164
Geography
Two, later three centres serving central Indian lenders
Reporting to
Head of Operations
Team
Eight transition coordinators; centre staff assigned by agreement
Financial scope
Individual approved transition budgets up to ₹24 lakh
Mandate
Bring client inventories into service with agreed acceptance conditions.
Outcomes
Introduced sampled inventory checks before transition estimates
Documented ownership of unresolved incoming differences
Completed nine contracted transitions with signed acceptance schedules
Decisions in context
I joined to manage the work between a signed service contract and an operating inventory. My team prepared transition plans, compared samples with sending registers and coordinated client decisions about differences. I did not have authority to decide that an absent document was legally unimportant. The practical challenge was to prevent work nobody had priced from disappearing into a vague promise to resolve matters later. I learnt to explain the additional checking effort and to seek a decision while the commercial parties could still adjust the plan. Some transitions needed a longer preparation period than the client first wanted. The nine completed assignments taught me to distinguish a delay caused by our own preparation from a deliberate change agreed to address evidence found during review, and to record both honestly.
Reason for the move
Promoted to regional operations after developing broader centre-management capability.
Apr 2004 — Jun 2009
Archive supervisor
Meruqti Document Services
Sector
Contracted business-record storage and retrieval
Ownership
Privately owned regional service company
Company scale
₹2.4–4.8 crore annual service revenue over tenure
Employees
31–57
Geography
Bhopal
Reporting to
Operations Manager
Team
Twelve document-room colleagues
Financial scope
₹9 lakh annual supplies and routine handling allowance at departure
Mandate
Maintain dependable receipt, location and authorised handover routines.
Outcomes
Introduced a review of located but unreleased requests
Trained colleagues to separate location from contents confirmation
Created documented shift handovers for unresolved retrievals
Decisions in context
My first supervisory role required me to make a routine dependable for other people. I allocated work, reviewed unresolved requests and arranged cover when an experienced colleague was absent. The temptation was to measure the team by the number of folders moved, because that figure was easy to obtain. I added a short review of requests that had been located but could not yet be released. It showed whether the obstacle was an instruction, an enclosure or our own handling. The review did not remove the client's authority over its records. It helped us ask a clearer question when permission or clarification was needed. I also learnt to explain an exception without blaming the person who had noticed it, which made staff more willing to raise uncertainty before a handover.
Reason for the move
Moved to a specialist financial-records business to lead client transitions.
Jun 1999 — Mar 2004
Document-room assistant, later senior assistant
Meruqti Document Services
Sector
Business-record administration
Ownership
Privately owned
Company scale
₹80 lakh–2.4 crore annual service revenue over tenure
Employees
18–31
Geography
Bhopal
Reporting to
Archive Supervisor
Team
Individual contributor within a six-person handling team
Financial scope
No budget authority; assigned receipt and retrieval tasks
Mandate
Prepare accurate receipt lists and locate records for supervised release.
Outcomes
Maintained location records for assigned storage sections
Documented discrepancies between labels and enclosed material
Helped induct three new document-room colleagues
Decisions in context
I entered after completing my commerce degree and learnt the service through its physical work. My assignments included receipt lists, location updates and preparation of requested folders for a supervisor's review. I could identify a difference but could not decide whether to release material or amend a client's inventory on my own. A recurring lesson was that finding a familiar reference did not establish that every expected enclosure was present. I began noting the exact difference so the supervisor could ask the client a useful question. Later I helped new colleagues follow the same routine and explain their handovers. That work developed my attention to evidence without giving me legal or lending expertise. The promotion followed an ability to make the routine understandable to others, not simply to process more requests myself.
Reason for the move
Promoted after five years of increasingly responsible handling and review work.
What I am looking for next
I would consider a COO role in a service business where records, permissions and handovers materially affect the customer's ability to act. The opportunity should include authority to change operating commitments and a commercial team willing to price the work those commitments require. Before moving, I would want to understand the service boundaries, the competence of the centre leaders and the main causes of unfinished work. A larger storage estate alone would not make a role a better fit. I would also discuss a first board appointment in a non-competing business with a clear operational oversight need. That would require employer agreement, a realistic time commitment and a structured induction. I am not seeking a seat as a source of client introductions or as a substitute for an executive operating role. My current responsibilities would need an orderly handover, including capable successors for the decisions that presently come to me. A transition should strengthen the existing team rather than leave an unresolved dependence behind.