I build enterprise systems that preserve the decisions behind a calendar, a client workspace and an archive, rather than allow an empty field or convenient default to decide for the business.
Open toBoard appointments · Executive opportunities
Application support through campaign-services CIO responsibility
At the board table
Veqzorn Campaign Services
Executive information-systems presenter; no statutory seat
Board technology and operating-commitment reviews
A system should carry the decision the business has made and reveal the decision still missing. A default becomes dangerous when its convenience makes that distinction hard to see.
The empty calendar did not mean available
In 2018 I supported a resource calendar that treated forty colleagues with thirty scheduled hours each as 1,200 hours available for campaign work. Daniel’s review identified 240 hours of approved leave and training within that total. The resulting 960 hours were only potential capacity before assignment and skill fit, yet the proposed allocation was 1,120. We held the excess 160 planned hours and spent ₹32 lakh over nine weeks correcting the system account. I had allowed an apparently empty calendar to stand for availability the business had not actually established.
I now lead information systems at Veqzorn Campaign Services in Guwahati. The 232-person enterprise recorded ₹112 crore FY2025–26 revenue across commissioned campaign production and account services. Twenty-six technology colleagues work through three heads within ₹5.1 crore annual operating expense and a separate ₹2.4 crore change programme. Lalita is our CEO, and Daniel owns operating delivery. My team carries their decisions through systems; it does not acquire staffing, client-permission or contractual authority because it can implement a convenient default.
Later reviews examined a client-workspace inheritance rule and an archive process that treated a completed project as automatically ready for removal. Twelve of forty reviewed folders had permissions broader than the accountable owner intended; ten were corrected and two remained held for clarification. Fifteen of sixty archive projects had unresolved contractual questions and were excluded from the proposed action. Neither case asserts an actual disclosure or a legal retention conclusion. I hold no statutory directorship or personal equity. A possible outside contribution would require further governance preparation, a specific interests assessment and a realistic twenty-three-day annual proposal. I want the enterprise to see the missing decision before a system quietly converts it into an instruction.
The calendar’s gross total was reduced before allocation
1,200 scheduled hours less 240 approved leave and training hours gave 960 potential hours before assignment and skill fit.
An unsupported planned allocation was held
The proposed 1,120 hours exceeded that potential account by 160 hours; the case does not claim actual overtime or cancellations.
Workspace permissions returned to the accountable owner
Twelve of forty reviewed folders required action; ten were corrected and two remained held for clarification.
Archive uncertainty stayed visible before the action
Fifteen of sixty projects had unresolved contractual questions; forty-five were eligible for the proposed process under owner review.
Current focus
Business systems that preserve the authority behind their defaults
Conversations I welcome
Information leadership and a prepared first outside-board contribution
The leadership record
Trusted with consequential decisions.
Formation
Bachelor of Science in ComputingDrevqathi Computing College · 1992
Ashok separated project completion from permission for the next archive action. He kept the unresolved contractual questions visible instead of making the technology team decide them to clear a workflow.
Lalita ZeqronliChief Executive, Veqzorn Campaign Services; fictional colleagueThe full record ↗
Contact
Information leadership and a prepared first outside-board contribution