Skip to website
Pranav VeldhankarChief Marketing Officer
Portrait of Pranav Veldhankar

Chief Marketing Officer · India

PranavVeldhankar

An office proposition should describe the working day, not stop at the building.

My first commercial-property research notes were less elegant than the presentations they supported.

Open to
  • Board appointments
  • Advisory roles
  • Speaking invitations

An office proposition should describe the working day, not stop at the building.

A prospective occupier rarely arrives with only a requirement for floor space. They also bring patterns of arrival, visitors, shared facilities and internal decisions about how their people will work. My role is to make the commercial proposition intelligible at that level without suggesting that marketing can settle every operating or contractual question. A good introduction helps the right conversation begin, with the building's actual features and the occupier's unresolved requirements both visible.

I am CMO of fictional Neravil Estates in Bengaluru. The group operates twenty-two completed office assets in three Indian cities, with ₹1,760 Cr FY2025–26 revenue and 1,420 employees. My own remit is thirty-six marketing employees, five direct reports, fourteen agency personnel separately and ₹42 Cr marketing authority for FY2026–27. I report to Ila Venkare. Dev Talwankar leads leasing negotiations and approved commercial terms; construction, asset operations and capital decisions belong to other colleagues.

Thirty-two years of research and marketing have made me attentive to the distance between an attractive building description and a useful occupier discussion. I began with commercial-property research in Hyderabad, then joined Neravil in July 2000 and developed through proposition, research and group-strategy roles. Since becoming CMO in July 2019, I have tried to make the marketing account more specific about use, evidence and the handover to the people who can answer the next question.

Factsheets organised around the way the asset is used

A review of eighteen asset factsheets led to eleven revisions and seven retained versions. Twenty-four selected facilities and HR conversations helped us identify where a uniform presentation concealed different access arrangements. Operations colleagues supplied the actual building account. I accepted less uniformity across the brochures because a repeated phrase could give an occupier confidence about an arrangement that still needed discussion.

A virtual tour that distinguishes what exists from what is imagined

Thirty-six proposed tour stops became twenty-two presentations of current physical features, eight clearly identified illustrative fit-outs and six removals. The smaller experience was less seamless, but it preserved a distinction important to the next discussion. Marketing could explain a possible use without allowing a visualisation to stand in for a completed space or an approved construction commitment.

An enquiry account prepared for a leasing conversation

Of forty-two reviewed enquiries, eighteen were ready for a leasing specialist, fourteen needed a clearer space brief and ten did not fit the current proposition. I chose to report those categories separately instead of treating the total as evidence of near-term occupied space. The exercise changed the handover and the questions asked beforehand; it did not establish a lease, a conversion uplift or an attributed revenue result.

Current focus

I am reviewing an eight-month pilot of shared professional and social events begun in May 2026. Of twenty planned sessions, twelve have taken place, five were rescheduled and three cancelled by October. The twelve completed sessions recorded 296 registrations and 187 attendances; those are event entries, not unique people. I want the next decision to reflect actual participation and asset-team feedback rather than let an attractive calendar stand in for a workplace community. The programme remains unfinished, with no claim about retention, productivity or tenant renewal.

Conversations I welcome

I am interested in a considered first non-executive contribution, bounded advisory discussions and professional sessions on occupier propositions. Any continuing role would require employer consent, relationship review, appropriate induction and a workable calendar. My experience is in market interpretation and communication; I would not present it as property valuation, engineering, financial or legal expertise.

36

Marketing employees

Five direct reports; fourteen agency personnel separately

₹42 Cr

FY2026–27 marketing authority

Capital commitments, asset operations and leasing terms excluded

32 years

Property-market research and communication

Commercial research through group marketing leadership, July 1994 onwards

The feature that looks persuasive in a property presentation may need a different explanation when an occupier imagines an ordinary Tuesday. I want the proposition to survive that change of perspective, including the conditions under which the building can actually be used.

Pranav Veldhankar

Chief Marketing Officer

Areas of stewardship

Where accountability has been mine.

  1. IAsset propositions grounded in occupier use
  2. IIProperty visualisations with an explicit evidence boundary
  3. IIIPrepared enquiries and leasing handovers
  4. IVPermission and scope in occupier accounts

Selected work

Decisions, and what they changed.

I

Replacing a uniform asset description with a usable account of access

In September 2022 I approved a fourteen-week, ₹1.4 Cr programme to review eighteen office-asset factsheets.

The full account

II

Interrupting the virtual tour where the physical evidence stopped

Our March 2023 virtual-tour programme had a twelve-week timetable and ₹2.2 Cr marketing authority.

The full account

III

Taking enquiries out of a single success total before the leasing handover

In February 2024 I authorised a ten-week, ₹1.1 Cr review of how marketing prepared office enquiries for leasing colleagues.

The full account

In the words of others

Trusted by those who appoint.

Pranav's enquiry account gave my team a clearer starting point. He kept the missing brief visible instead of describing every contact as ready for the same commercial discussion.
Dev TalwankarFictional leasing director, Neravil Estates
He was willing to release a smaller virtual tour when the proposed sequence blurred current features with possible arrangements. The distinction survived the creative review.
Ila VenkareFictional chief executive, Neravil Estates

The journal

Perspective, set down with care.

An invitation

Contact

I am interested in a considered first non-executive contribution, bounded advisory discussions and professional sessions on occupier propositions. Any continuing role would require employer consent, relationship review, appropriate induction and a workable calendar. My experience is in market interpretation and communication; I would not present it as property valuation, engineering, financial or legal expertise.

Open to
  • Board appointments
  • Advisory roles
  • Speaking invitations

office@pranavveldhankar.example