Jul 2021 — Present
Chief strategy officer
Kalverrin Mutual Bank
- Sector
- Customer-owned banking: home loans, farm and small-business lending, deposits
- Ownership
- Mutual owned by its 81,000 members; no external shareholders
- Company scale
- A$3.6 billion of assets; A$16.8 million net profit after tax in 2025–26
- Employees
- About 430
- Geography
- Rockhampton head office; 23 branches across Central and western Queensland
- Reporting to
- Reports to the chief executive; attends board strategy sessions and risk committee meetings by invitation
- Team
- Eleven across strategy, corporate development, member insight and the portfolio office
- Financial scope
- A$9 million annual strategic investment portfolio; growth and distribution assumptions in the capital plan
Mandate
Establish whether the bank should remain independent, and on what evidence, and direct investment accordingly.
Outcomes
- Recommended declining a 2023 merger approach and designed the standalone test the board adopted
- Replaced a three-branch urban overlap with a five-year commitment to four western branches
- Opened a regional broker channel that lifted mortgage growth from 1.8% to 6.1%
- Led the business case for the A$15.2 million digital platform replacement
Decisions in context
The chief executive created this role with a single question attached: should Kalverrin stay independent? My answer has been conditional. I recommended declining the 2023 merger approach and wrote the test that will tell the board whether that was right. I also run the strategic investment portfolio, deciding with the executive committee which projects receive the A$9 million available each year. The broker channel and the branch plan both came from this office, and both were contested by colleagues whose arguments I took seriously. I present to the board at each strategy session and to the risk committee when growth assumptions affect the capital plan. I do not own capital, credit or operations. My job is to make the choices between them visible, priced and dated, so the people who carry them can see what they are agreeing to. That separation keeps my recommendations honest.
Reason for the move
Current role; seeking a second non-executive appointment alongside it.
Feb 2016 — Jun 2021
General manager, planning and member insight
Kalverrin Mutual Bank
- Sector
- Customer-owned retail and agribusiness banking
- Ownership
- Member-owned mutual
- Company scale
- A$2.7 billion of assets at June 2021
- Employees
- About 390 at period end
- Geography
- Rockhampton head office; 26 branches in Central and western Queensland
- Reporting to
- Chief financial officer, with direct access to the chief executive for the strategic plan
- Team
- Six analysts and researchers
- Financial scope
- Annual business plan and a A$2.1 million research and planning budget
Mandate
Build a member insight function and connect it to the annual plan.
Outcomes
- Mapped members under strain after the coal downturn and shaped the hardship response
- Created the first branch study combining visits, holdings and distance
- Introduced a member survey of 6,000 responses a year
- Coordinated three annual business plans and the 2020 strategy refresh
Decisions in context
I arrived as the coal downturn was hurting members in Moranbah and Emerald, where house values had fallen sharply and some borrowers owed more than their homes were worth. My first work was to identify those members and what they needed, so that the hardship team could act before arrears grew. That research became a permanent insight function. We built an annual member survey and the first branch study to combine visits with product holdings and travel distance. I learnt that the least visited branches were often the ones members depended on most. I also coordinated the annual business plan, which taught me how the bank's divisions bargain for resources. By 2021 the chief executive wanted strategy separated from planning, with one person accountable for the independence question, and offered me the role. My successor in planning now runs the survey and branch study I started.
Reason for the move
Appointed to the newly created chief strategy officer role.
Apr 2011 — Jan 2016
Head of portfolio strategy
Pastorvane Rural Finance
- Sector
- Specialist agribusiness lending to family farms and rural businesses
- Ownership
- Privately owned non-bank lender funded by institutional facilities
- Company scale
- A$1.9 billion loan book at January 2016
- Employees
- About 210
- Geography
- Toowoomba head office; lending across Queensland and northern New South Wales
- Reporting to
- Chief executive
- Team
- Five analysts
- Financial scope
- Commodity and regional limits across a A$1.9 billion loan book; funding-capacity planning
Mandate
Set portfolio limits that kept growth within what the lender's funders would support.
Outcomes
- Introduced commodity and regional concentration limits
- Reduced feedlot exposure from 19% to 12% of the book
- Built a three-year funding-capacity plan agreed with the two main funders
Decisions in context
This role taught me that growth is permitted, not chosen. Pastorvane's funders set limits on concentration and quality, and every new lending initiative had to fit inside them. I built the portfolio limits by commodity and region and reported them monthly to the chief executive. The hardest decision was reducing feedlot lending, where the lender had a strong reputation, from 19% to 12% of the book. The sales team argued we were abandoning loyal customers; the funders were concerned about concentration. We kept existing clients and slowed new lending. I also prepared the funding-capacity plan that set how fast the book could grow. By 2016 I wanted to work where the balance sheet belonged to the customers themselves, and a customer-owned bank in Central Queensland, a region I already knew well, offered exactly that.
Reason for the move
Joined a customer-owned bank to work on strategy funded by member deposits rather than wholesale facilities.
Aug 2005 — Mar 2011
Credit analyst, later senior portfolio analyst
Pastorvane Rural Finance
- Sector
- Agribusiness lending
- Ownership
- Privately owned non-bank lender
- Company scale
- A$1.3 billion loan book at March 2011
- Employees
- About 160 at period end
- Geography
- Toowoomba; Queensland and northern New South Wales
- Reporting to
- Head of credit
- Team
- No direct reports until 2009; then two analysts
- Financial scope
- Credit analysis of facilities up to A$8 million; quarterly concentration reports
Mandate
Assess farm and rural-business credit applications and track portfolio concentration.
Outcomes
- Analysed about 240 farm and agribusiness facilities
- Introduced seasonal cash-flow testing for cotton and grain borrowers
- Produced the first quarterly concentration report for the funders
Decisions in context
I joined to learn how farm cash flows become credit decisions. I analysed applications from cotton growers, grain farms and feedlots, and the long dry years tested every assumption I made. A farm could be profitable over ten years and unable to meet a payment in the third. I introduced seasonal cash-flow testing so that facilities were sized to the worst months, not the average. From 2009 I supervised two analysts and produced a quarterly report showing where the book was concentrated by commodity and district. That report became the basis for conversations with the lender's funders and, later, for my own portfolio role. I completed a graduate diploma in applied finance part-time during this period, which gave me a more rigorous grounding in funding and capital and the vocabulary to argue with the lender's treasury team.
Reason for the move
Promoted to head of portfolio strategy.
- Sector
- Farm supplies, fuel and livestock marketing
- Ownership
- Cooperative owned by about 2,600 producer members
- Company scale
- About A$148 million annual turnover in 2005
- Employees
- About 190
- Geography
- Emerald head office; nine stores across the Central Highlands
- Reporting to
- Chief financial officer
- Team
- Two-person planning unit
- Financial scope
- Store and fuel-depot performance; modelling of members' annual rebates
Mandate
Measure the performance of each store and depot and model the rebate returned to members.
Outcomes
- Built the first store-by-store profitability report
- Modelled the 2003 merchandise merger proposal for the board
- Redesigned rebate modelling to show its effect on store pricing
Decisions in context
The cooperative was owned by the producers who bought from it, so every margin was also a question of fairness between members. I built the first report showing which stores and fuel depots made money and which relied on others. In 2003 I modelled a proposal to merge the merchandise business with a larger cooperative. The savings were real, but members rejected the merger because they feared losing local stores. Two years later the cooperative sold one of those stores on worse terms than the merger would have offered. I took two lessons from that: member ownership creates loyalty a competitor cannot buy, and it can also delay an honest conversation about scale. I moved into lending because I wanted to understand the financing behind the farms our members ran, and why some survived a dry run of seasons while neighbours did not.
Reason for the move
Moved into agribusiness lending to understand how farm cash flows are financed.
Feb 1997 — Feb 2000
Graduate economist
Cardellow Economics
- Sector
- Regional economic and impact consulting
- Ownership
- Partnership of three principals
- Company scale
- About A$2.6 million in annual fees
- Employees
- Eighteen
- Geography
- Brisbane; projects across regional Queensland
- Reporting to
- Principal economist
- Team
- Project teams of two to four; no direct reports
- Financial scope
- Analysis for council and industry-body commissions
Mandate
Prepare economic impact analysis for regional clients.
Outcomes
- Contributed to eleven regional impact studies
- Built a shire-level model of drought effects on local spending
- Drafted the service-access chapter of a western Queensland study
Decisions in context
I started as a graduate economist writing impact studies for councils and industry bodies. The work involved models of stock numbers, wages and local spending. The most useful thing I learnt came from fieldwork. In a western shire, a bank branch had closed months before our visit, and a newsagent described driving ninety minutes each week to deposit her takings. Our model had no place for that cost, so I drafted a chapter on access to services, which the principal accepted. It was my first lesson that a financial service in a small town does work that transaction data misses. After three years I wanted to work inside a regional business rather than describe it from Brisbane. A cooperative in Emerald offered an analyst role close to the producers I had been studying, and I moved there in March 2000.
Reason for the move
Joined a producer cooperative to work inside a regional business rather than advise from outside.
What I am looking for next
I am looking for a second non-executive role, alongside my not-for-profit directorship, while I remain at Kalverrin. The best fit would be a member-owned or regional organisation outside banking that is facing a question of scale, consolidation or service footprint: an agricultural cooperative, a regional health or community-services provider, or a member-owned insurer that does not compete with us. I would bring experience in testing a standalone case honestly, planning a footprint around what members depend on and assessing partnerships without losing control of the member relationship. I would join a risk or audit committee first and learn the organisation before taking a chair's role. Twenty-five days a year is my realistic allowance, subject to my chief executive's consent and a conflicts review covering our members, borrowers and suppliers. I am not looking for an executive move. My interest is in helping a board make a difficult choice about its size or shape with the evidence in front of it.