I shape growth in power-equipment testing around the time a valid examination requires, the impartiality of its commercial terms and whether the intended recipient can use the report.
I began with measurement work because I liked the discipline of a result that could be traced to its conditions. Moving into planning introduced a different kind of number: a forecast of work the company might win. The danger was that commercial figures looked just as precise while carrying much weaker assumptions. My own capacity recommendation eventually exposed that difference. I had counted prospective jobs carefully and still failed to describe what performing them would require.
Growth is useful only if the evidence we sell remains possible to produce, impartial in its conclusion and usable for the customer’s actual purpose.