I want a bicycle retailer to earn attention from people whose journeys differ from the riders already closest to the brand, with research, partnerships and availability described honestly.
My first research assignments taught me to value a completed interview. They also taught me, more slowly, to ask who had not been interviewed. An articulate participant could explain a preference with confidence, and a full spreadsheet could make the work feel complete. Neither established that the people who answered represented the people a client wanted to reach. That distinction became personal when I later sponsored a cycling proposition whose evidence came from riders already unusually close to the category.
The people who answer most readily are not necessarily the people we need to understand next. I want the route into our evidence, the relationship behind a recommendation and the availability behind an invitation to remain visible.